Where was Cardinal Ratzinger, the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith? Where was Pope Pius XII in 1949?

Comments from The Remnant Newspaper

Hold on, this is waiting to be approved by Remnant Newspaper.

While I would admit that there are elements of Vatican II which were deliberately

 termed with ambiguity so-as to allow the progressives room to implement their 

changes, many modernist and heretical notions have been introduced by Vatican

 II, such as ecumenism and religious liberty. 

Lionel:

The ambiguity comes with the use of an irrational
 premise and interpretation in the Letter of the Holy Office
1949.It was  carried over into Vatican Council II. It is an
objective error.
This cannot be the teaching of the Holy Spirit in Vatican 
Council II.

Yes, with this ambiguity progressives have room
 to implement changes.Doctrinally and pastorally 
they are teaching heresy.

__________________

In "A Brief Critical Study of the Novus Ordo Missae", Cardinals Ottaviani, Bacci
 and others stated that the Novus Ordo, "both as a whole and in its details, a
striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated
 in Session XXIII of the Council of Trent."

Lionel:

Yes!It is a different theology. It is not a Catholic 

theology. It is an innovation. It leads to heresy. It 

is good that the SSPX has rejected this interpretation

 of Vatican Council II with this new theology.But

 they must choose the alternative and not just keep

 rejecting Vatican Council II( Feeneyite).

There is a choice for all Catholics.We can interpret

 Vatican Council II without this new theology and 

then the Council will be traditional.The progressives

 will not find any citations in the Council.

Cardinal Ottaviani did not know what caused the

 new theology and ecclesiology. He himself was 

using the irrational premise and conclusion. He 

had accepted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.

So did Archbishop Lefebvre.

The new theology comes from the Letter of the

 Holy Office 1949 which assumed that the baptism

 of desire referred to objectively known cases in 

the present times,cases of people saved without the 

baptism of water. So a connection was made with the

dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).What 

was specualtive was considered real and defacto. 

This derailed the old theology.How could a connection

 be mae between an invisible case and the teaching on

 all needing to be incorporated into the Church as 

members for salvation. All need to physically and 

visibly enter the Church for salvation and if there 

was an exception it would have to be visible and known.

So an innovation had now come into the Church and 

Cardinal Ottaviani did not notice it. Instead he 

criticised Fr. Leonard Feeney who was not saying

 anything new.

_________________________

Archbishop Lefebvre said, "The Novus Ordo Missae, even when said with
 piety and respect for the liturgical rules ...is impregnated with the spirit of 

Protestantism. It bears within it a poison harmful to the faith."

Lionel:

He is referring to the new theology.

At the Council of Trent they still affirmed the

 'rigorist interpretation' of the dogma EENS.

This was not so after 1949.The dogma was eliminated

 in 1960-65 with the irrational pemise. LG 16 was 

supposed to refer to known and visible cases saved in

 invincible ignorance and without the baptism of 

water..So the Novus Ordo Mass was being offered 

with confusion in salvation theology.The new 

salvation theology said there is known salvation outside

 the Catholic Church. So Fr.Karl Rahner S.J put

 forward the Anonymous Christian theory and Pope 

Benedict XVI accepted it in the Catechism of the 

Catholic Church 846.It says all who are saved are 

saved through Jesus and the Church. It does not say 

all need to enter the Church for salvation. Cardinal 

Ratzinger was accomodating the baptism of desire 

etc as being explicit and as being exceptions to the

 the dogma EENS.So with these 'invisible visible' 

cases he too was saying like Rahner that there is 

salvation outside the Church. This is the cause of

the hermeneutic of rupture and he does not notice it.

___________________________

In the face of such scandal and sacrilege, where was the outrage? 

Lionel:

There was no outrage since no one knew ( or said 

so in public) that the cause for the confusion was

 there in the interpretation of Vatican Council II 

and that there is a traditional choice.No one was 

choosing the traditional option. Now that the monks

 at Norcia know about it, do you think they would be

 allowed to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony

 with Feeneyite EENS and the old ecclesiology?!

I doubt it.The whole world will come swooping 

down on them. 

______________________________

Only silence except for the voices and actions of a few brave men. Today
we find ourselves the children of this unprecedented deception.

Lionel:

Unprecedented deception! I agree with you!

Where was Cardinal Ratzinger, the Prefect of the 
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith? Where
 was Pope Pius XII in 1949?

Did they not notice the bad philosophy and 
theology?

_______________________________

Only through the complete abrogation of the Novus Ordo and full restoration
of the Traditional Latin Mass, will we begin the process to removing modernism
from the Church.

Lionel:

The fault is not there with liturgy but ecclesiology.

Once we identify the irrational premise and avoid it
 we are back to the old ecclesiology, without doing 
anything new.With the ecclesiology, based on Feeneyite
 EENS, there can only be an ecumenism of return and
 we can interpret the hypothetical references in Vatican
 Council II (UR 3, NA 2, LG 8, LG 16 etc) as just being
 hypothetical and imaginary and so they cannot be 
explicit exceptions in 2016 to the old ecclesiology.
So we would have the old ecclesiology, the only
 rational theology, at the Novus Ordo Mass and the
Tradtional Latin Mass.

________________________________

-Lionel Andrades

http://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=2854:sspx-district-
superior-for-italy-objects-to-scandal-in-sweden