The Polish Episcopal Conference can correct the error by announcing that the baptism of desire refers to invisible cases in 2016. Also LG 16, LG8, NA 2, UR 3 etc in Vatican Council II, all refer to invisible cases

XXV Rocznica Powstania Radia Maryja: Przemówienie prezydenta RP Andrzeja Dudy

23:07

All the Polish Catholics in this video interpret Lumen Gentium 16( invisible ignorance) as referring to known people in the present times saved in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water.Lumen Gentium 16 refers to visible cases for them.
For me Lumen Gentium 16 refers to invisible cases.
Since Lumen Gentium 16 refers to visible cases, the Polish cardinals and bishops,assume Lumen Gentium 16 is a break with the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. It is a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to St. Maximillian Kolbe, St. Faustina Kowalski or St. Stanislaus Kotska.
Now if the Polish people, the religious and laity, interpret Lumen Gentium 16 as referring to invisible cases. Then the interpretation of Vatican Council II,Lumen Gentium 16 is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the Polish saints.
This problem has arisen because of the mistake made in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney. This Letter assumed that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance referred to visible instead of invisible cases.The same religious who made the mistake in 1949 Boston were also active at Vatican Council (1960-65).
The Polish Episcopal Conference can correct the error by announcing that the baptism of desire refers to invisible cases in 2016. Also LG 16, LG8, NA 2, UR 3 etc in Vatican Council II, all refer to invisible cases.

-Lionel Andrades