La Stampa has posted an editorial Amoris Laetitia: Where Truth and Mercy Embrace 1 justifying 'philosophical subjectivism' and playing God.The writer tries to answer the questions of the four cardinals in the dubbia.
Philosophical subjectivism is common in the Catholic Church after the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston was issued and not corrected.It suggests that we can subjectively identify non Catholics saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.It considered the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as not being theoretical and hypothetical.Instead ,it postulated them as being practical exceptions to the Feeneyite and traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.For the cardinals in Rome and Boston in 1949 the Letter referred to defacto and known cases of a catechumen who desired the baptism of water and died before receiving it and is now in Heaven.
So with this irrational subjectivism in salvation theology for the ideological magisterium, we now have subjectivism in moral theology being taught at pontifical universities.This moral subjectivism,is the norm.
An extraordinary case is mentioned by moral theologians Fr.Curran and Fr.Harding and they judge that this theoretical and unknown person has been saved, or will be saved and is an exception to the traditional teaching on mortal sin.Then they insist, they judge,that we cannot judge moral cases in general according to the traditional teachings of the Church.
This is the error of Amoris Laetitia and which La Stampa is still trying to white wash.The editorial like Amoris Laetitia assumes we can judge exceptions to the general moral teachings of the Church and so there are exceptions to the norm given by Bible and interpreted by the popes and Tradition.This is the new moral theology of Pope Benedict and Pope Francis.
It directly contradicts Ecclesia di Eucharestia and Veritatis Splendor of Pope John Paul II and Catholic Tradition in general.
This new faith ( salvation) and moral theology is the work of the Devil,through the usual Leftist sources and especially the Synagogue of Satan.They control the mainstream media.Catholics are given this false narrative on morals, supported by the present ideological magisterium of the Catholic Church.
La Stampa cites Vatican Council II.The writer is unable to see that there are many errors in the Council based on philosophical subjectivism.The wrong inference is that LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc are practical exceptions, known to us human beings, to the dogma EENS.
Since there is a change in the exclusivist ecclesiocentrism of the past, Cardinal Walter Kasper in an interview before the Synod, said there could be changes in other areas of Church teaching and that the Eucharist could be given to the divorced and remarried.
He meant if no one objects to the philosophical subjectivism in Vatican Council II and the 1949 Letter then why object to it in moral theology.
The editorial in La Stampa too agrees.For them a Confessor would be able to detect exceptions to the general moral teaching and these exceptions would be the new general rule in Catholic moral theology.The Maltese and German bishops have confirmed.This is the new norm and it has been supported by L'Osservatore Romano and the one world religion people.
Praxis and doctrine has been changed and they do not consider it heresy.They do not say that Pope Francis is supporting heresy.
There is a new doctrine in faith(salvation) and morals, based on subjectively being able to know practical exceptions to the general rule . This is enforced pastorally and now it has been legitimized, made official, by Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia.
It is a rejection of the Church's teachings on mortal sin, the Eucharist and the sanctity of marriage.-Lionel Andrades