Sunday, January 15, 2017

Media chooses Vatican Council II (Cushingite) instead of Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) : approved magisterial heresy

For Philip Pullela(Reuters), Nicole Winfield (AP) and other journalists Vatican Council II is always Cushingite instead of Feeneyite.The Council is interpreted with an irrational premise.So the conclusion is non-traditional Cushingism.There emerges a break with Catholic traditional teaching on there being no salvation outside the Church.If they interpreted Vatican Council II without the irrational premise; without the baptism of desire being visible,then Vatican Council II is Feeneyite.It is in harmony with the ecclesiocentrism of the past.
This means in inter-religious dialogue I would say like Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson and Fr. Stefano Visintin osb that there are no personally known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was known over the centuries.
And if there are no exceptions then we are officially back to the old ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
Image result for nostra Aetate logos
So all Muslims and Jews need to convert into the Catholic Church as members.Since there is no known salvation outside the Church to contradict EENS.A possibility is not a concrete exception to the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS.It is only speculation.
So in inter religious dialogue I would be saying all Jews, Muslims, Orthodox Christians and Protestants need to be incorporated into the Catholic Church as visible members to avoid the fires of Hell and this would be just a personal view.It would be the official teaching of the Catholic Church according to Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) and traditional magisterial documents in 2017.It would be magisterial according to the Church documents but not necessarly magisterial according to the people in the Vatican.
Image result for Logo La StampaRelated image
Image result for Logo L'osservatore RomanoRelated imageImage result for logo Tablet  newspaper u.kImage result for logo of National catholic register
So if Philip Pullela,Nicole Winfield, Cindy Wooden and Edward Pentin would interpret Vatican Council II like me, they would reach the same conclusion.It would not be my personal opinion but the official teaching of the Church according to the text of Vatican Council II. Ad Gentes 7 supports the dogma EENS and LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to invisible and not visible cases in 2017.So they are not relevant or exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).There is no violation of the Principle of Non Contradiction.
However they have to use the irrational premise (invisible cases are visible, people in Heaven are visible on earth) to violate the Principle of Non Contradiction and create a conclusion which is irrational, non traditional and heretical for Catholics.
They also cannot report Vatican Council II as being Feeneyite since it is not magisterial or approved by the Jewish Left.Their employers would object.
So it was no surprise for them I suppose when in March 2016 Pope Benedict said that there was 'a development with Vatican Council II' and so the dogma EENS was no more like it was for the 16th century missionaries.He was referring of course, to Vatican Council II, Cushingite.It's only with an irrational premise,that there is a rupture with EENS.
Pope Benedict would know that if he cited Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) there would be no change in the dogma EENS, it would be the same as it was in the 16th century.
Image result for nostra Aetate logos
Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) would indicate that Mohammad and all Muslims are oriented to Hell, as the Church held over the centuries.This would not be approved by the political Left  or Cardinal Muller and Archbishop Di Noia.They  have to remain ideological and so reject Vatican Council II (F).
This is politically correct for La Stampa and La Repubblica but it is magisterial heresy which is officially being maintained throughout the Church by the two popes.
So With Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) there is no incardinatiion for a priest.He has to affirm the irrational Vatican Council II ( Cushingite).There is no professorship in a pontifical university for a priest or lay Catholic who affirms Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).The Society of St.Pius X cannot be granted a prelature unless they approved Vatican Council II (Cushingite) with its non traditional conclusions.The Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate cannot offer the Latin Mass or the Novus Ordo Mass if they affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).
Vatican Council II (F) would not be approved by the two popes so that they could maintain 'good relations with the Jews'(of the Left).
With Vatican Council II(F) I cannot study Philosophy or Theology at a pontifical university in Rome.This I know.
The rank and file Catholic however is not told that there is an objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston and that error is repeated in Vatican Council II.The Letter assumes there is known salvation outside the Church with visible for us baptism of desire etc.
Image result for nostra Aetate logos
So Nostra Aetate states:
 841 The Church's relationship with the Muslims. "The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind's judge on the last day." 1

'The plan of salvation also includes...'
Vatican Council II (Nostra Aetate) assumes a possbility known only to God (and which would really follow with the baptism of water in the Catholic Church since this is the dogmatic teaching of EENS) is an exception to the traditional interpretation of EENS.There is known salvation outside the visible boundaries of the Church for the Vatican Council II cardinals. Since there was known salvation outside the Church according to the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office which was approved by the magisterium of that time.
The Letter with the objective error has been placed in the Denzinger by Fr.Karl Rahner s.j.The objective error is there all over Vatican Council II. It is like a theme.
Feeneyites avoid it in the interpretation of the Council. They simply assume it is a reference to a hypothetical case.
The Reuters and AP correspondents hold on to the error and assume like the rest of the Church that it is a reference not to a hypothetical cases but someone personally known.Then they report that Vatican Council II is ' a revolution' in the Church .The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is too afraid to issue a correction.-Lionel Andrades

Nostra Aetate: Celebrating Fifty Years of the Catholic Church's

OCTOBER 28, 2015

The Vatican has made a mistake and there is a cover up by liberal journalists

OCTOBER 27, 2015

Associated Press blacks out information on magisterial heresy : AP reports on Vatican Council II were based on a factual error

Image result for photo of Archbishop Thomas E.gullickson

JANUARY 14, 2017

Two popes irrational and in heresy : Archbishop Gullickson, Fr.Visintin osb correct

A template for real Catholic reform in 2017

JANUARY 13, 2017

Thomas D.Williams calls for a reform in the Church with a new theology and new doctrines which are heretical and irrational but politically correct with the Left, of which he now is a part of

St. Peter's seen from the Tiber river

JANUARY 13, 2017

I'm a Catholic on theology and doctrine : the two popes, trads and sedes are irrational, non traditional and heretical

JANUARY 11, 2017

cardinal raymond burke

Cardinal Burke tell Pope Francis that Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) is not magisterial and he cannot accept it while he accepts Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and would expect the pope to do the same

Xl arch. gerhard muller now cardinal elect with pope benedict xvi

JANUARY 9, 2017

Cardinal Muller for ideological reasons has changed doctrine with an irrational theology to create magisterial heresy


No comments: