Wednesday, January 25, 2017

When I write about all this Catholics ask how could it be so simple ? There must be something wrong in what you say.Why did we not know about this before? Even the SSPX and the sedevacantists did not know ?

My Spiritual Director at the Beda Pontifical College, Fr.Jim would say that we cannot really know the three conditions of mortal sin and so we cannot really know a mortal sin.
Partially correct. We cannot know the three conditions of a mortal sin, subjectively we cannot judge them as being exceptions, so they are not exceptions to the traditional teaching on mortal sin. However we know what is a mortal sin and there is no new moral theology based on alleged  exceptions, to contradict it.
Image result for Photos of catechism of the catholic church bookSo the Catechism's three conditions for mortal sin are not really knowable conditions and so are not exceptions to the traditional teaching on mortal sin.
Similarly the baptism of desire cannot be known in personal cases and so is not an exception to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
So the Catechism supports the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus when it says all need faith and baptism (Ad Gentes 7),outside the Church there is no salvation(CCC846).So there are no exceptions to the dogma EENS mentioned in the Catechism.
Similarly the Catechism affirms the traditional teaching on mortal sin and Hell while the three conditions are hypothetical and not exceptions to the traditional teachings on morals.
So this means that the Catechism of the Catholic Church:
Image of St. Francis Xavier
1.Supports the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the 16th century missionaries for example.
2.It supports traditional morals.
3.It supports traditional ecumenism since all non Catholic Christians are on the way to Hell without faith and baptism in the Catholic Church.This is the traditional ecclesiocentrism based on Feeneyite EENS which the Catechism does not contradict.
4.Non Christians are oriented to Hell with no known exceptions.Supports the traditional teaching on other religions whose members are all oriented to Hell in 2017 since there is no known salvation outside the Church. So the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is not contradicted by the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
5.Catholics in inter-faith marriages are living in adultery.Considers Catholics who marry non Catholics in civil marriages as living in adultery.Non Catholics are outside the Church and are on the way to Hell.
6.It supports the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation since all need to be members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell and this is the priority in politics.So there is no separation of Church and State.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church supports the ecclesiocentrism of the past when we do not confuse invisible and hypothetical cases as being objectively known.
This is the confusion of the present magisterium.Instead of clarifying the Faith for Catholics they have been concealing it for ideological reasons.
When I write this Catholics ask how could it be so simple there must be something wrong in what you say.Or why did we not know of this before? How come you a lay man is explaining this and not the numerous persons,including priests, with theological degrees?
Why did the SSPX bishops and priests and sedevacantists not know this?
I say to myself they were not aware of the false theology and the simple alternative and they were wrongly blaming the Novus Ordo Mass.
However all this can change
All Catholics can now affirm Tradition and use the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II as a supporting reference.
They can demand canonical status and affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) in which invisible cases are only invisible) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church( Feeneyite).
They can demand that the two popes, the present magisterium affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite). Since Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) is irrational, non traditional and heretical. It is based on a false premise.What is invisible is assumed to be visible.A new fantasy theology was then created upon this philosophical error.
They can ask the CDF to acknowledge that there has been a major philosophical error in theology and doctrine.They could point out the philosophical error of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which is repeated in Vatican Council II, especially in Nostra Aetate which suggests that there is known salvation outside the Church and so non Catholics are saved in their religions.
All this is possible for Catholics who acknowledge the obvious i.e invisible cases cannot be physically visible.Invisible subjective factors cannot mistakenly be assumed to be known and manifest with reference to mortal sin and salvation.They cannot be inferred to be an exception to general principles or traditional teaching.This was also a basic mistake in Pope Francis' Amoris Laetitia.
-Lionel Andrades
Image result for Photo logo Prayers for Christian Unity
January 24, 2017

No comments: