Wednesday, January 11, 2017

Cardinal Burke tell Pope Francis that Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) is not magisterial and he cannot accept it while he accepts Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and would expect the pope to do the same

cardinal raymond burke

Why doesn't Cardinal Burke just go ahead and tell Pope Francis that Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) is not magisterial and he cannot accept it.
Tell Pope Francis that as a cardinal he accepts Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) which is in harmony with Tradition. He would expect Pope Francis to do the same.1
Cardinal Burke could say that Vatican Council II in principle assumes hypothetical cases are not hypothetical.It assumes the baptism of desire (LG 14) and being saved in invincible ignorance(LG 16) excludes the baptism of water and are objective cases in the present times:So they become exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It is assumed, in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, that there are known people alive, who will be saved without the baptism of water but with the baptism of desire.So there is salvation outside the Church. Every one does not need to be incorporated into the Church as a member is the il logical conclusion.
This interpretation of Vatican Council II is irrational and cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit. So it cannot be magisterial.
Where are the cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance in 2017?
Where are the cases of people who will be saved without the baptism of water in 2017, who can judge them and know them?
How can LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to explicitly known people in 2017 and not be hypothetical cases, only theoretical possibilities and speculation?
This 'magisterial' interpretation of Vatican Council II cannot be magisterial .So Cardinal Burke must tell the pope that he rejects it as he does Amoris Laetitia.He should ask the two popes to do the same.
I would request Cardinal Burke to please ask Pope Francis how is Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) magisterial?
I (Lionel) see Vatican Council II as being Feeneyite. So there is no rupture with Tradition for me.In Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) LG 16, LG 8, UR 3,NA 2 etc are references to theoretical and speculative cases.They are unknown in the present times(2017) .They are not relevant or exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS.
With their being no exceptions to EENS in Vatican Council II, the ecclesiology of the Council is the same as the ecclesiocentrism of the past.2
Vatican Council II affirms an ecumenism of return and the need for all non Christians to enter the Church as members.Since there is no known salvation outside the Church and outside the Church there is no salvation all political legislation must have Jesus as known in the Catholic Church, as it's centre.There cannot be a separation of Church and State since the priority is saving souls from going to Hell who are not Catholics.In Heaven there are only Catholics.So all non Christian need to be members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell must be the message in inter-religious dialogue.
There is no Anonymous Christian since there is no known salvation outside the Church. We can no more say that a non Christian could be saved in his religion and this is an exception to Feeneyite EENS.Since there is no such case known or knowable. It is speculation and not a concrete case.
It was based upon this Cushingite speculation that a new theology emerged which speculated that EENS was eliminated since there were known exceptions. There are none.So the new theology is redundant.
Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) with visible for us LG 16, LG 14 etc is irrational, non traditional and heretical.
The Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller, has spoken out once again on the issue of the “dubia” put forward by four cardinals with regard to the “Amoris Laetitia”. Cardinal Müller stated that “a correction of the Pope is not possible at this time because the faith is not in any danger”.3
The faith is not in danger ? There is no faith! The magisterium is violating the Principle of Non Contradiction and the conclusion is heresy.There is a new faith.
Now, the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith seems to be casting aside the possibility of a “correction”.
Pope Francis and Cardinal Muller could also be asked for a correction on Vatican Council II. The error is obvious and objective and it has infected the whole Church along with the Congregation for the  Doctrine of the Faith.
“Amoris Laetitia” is very clear in terms of its doctrine and we can interpret all of Jesus’ doctrine on marriage, the entire Church doctrine over 2000 years of history”.
This is false since Amoris Laetitia uses irrational philosophical subjectivism to suggest that there are known exceptions, to mortal sin.So remarried and divorced couples can receive the Eucharist. It would not be sacrilegous.This is a rupture with  2000 years of history.
Similarly Vatican Council ( Cushingite) as interpreted by Pope Francis and Cardinal Muller assumes there are known cases of the baptism of desire ( LG 14) and being saved in invincible ignorance(LG 16) without the baptism of water.This is false. There are no such cases known in the past or present. So physically there cannot be any manifest exception, mentioned in Vatican Council II, to the Feeneyite  interpretation of the dogma EENS. Once again we have irrational philosophical subjectivism.
So we see an ideological magisterium in 2017, trying to change 2000 years of history, by using an irrational premise which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.They have done it with salvation theology and have got away with it and are now trying to do the same with moral theology.
Cardinal Burke must see the link between an ideological change in faith and morals  in Amoris Laetitia and Vatican Council II.
-Lionel Andrades
January 10, 2017
Vatican Council II as interpreted by the two popes cannot be magisterial for Cardinal Burke since it is no different from the philosophical error in Amoris Laetitia
 Xl arch. gerhard muller now cardinal elect with pope benedict xvi
January 9, 2017
Cardinal Muller for ideological reasons has changed doctrine with an irrational theology to create magisterial heresy
Müller: “There will be no correction of the Pope”


No comments: