Thursday, February 16, 2017

Bishop Schneider has compromised and now wants the SSPX to compromise with him

The bishop who has called for a Syllabus of Errors on Vatican Council II and does not know that we simply have to reverse the visible-invisible distinction; avoid a false premise and discard the new theology- and it   changes the interpretation of the Council to a traditional one has given another pro-Pope Francis and Vatican Curia interview.
Working along with Ecclesia Dei the bishop has accepted the Cushingite version of Vatican Council II, the only one he knows of, and now wants the SSPX to also approve this doctrinal mess, as he has, to be recognized by the present magisterium in public heresy.
It is posted on Rorate Caeili whose correspondents also interpret Vatican Council II with the same visible-invisible confusion, use a false premise since it is politically correct with the Left and like Archbishop Lefebvre use the new theology in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.
On the other hand if Bishop Athanasius Schneider interpreted Vatican Council II with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism, he would be considered fundamentalist, rigid, restorationist and triumphalistic by Pope Francis. He could lose his canonical status.
So he has compromised and now wants the SSPX to also compromise with him.
He is all for not receiving the Eucharist in the hand and this is commendable, and to offer Mass ad orientem, which is appreciated, however he wants the Latin Mass offered , with the new ecclesiology based on an irrational premise and non traditional conclusion.This is not the Traditional Latin Mass and so it is approved by the present magisterium which is in heresy.They are a break with Tradition and have now the support of the SSPX and Bishop Schneider.
Yes it is important for the SSPX to enter the Church.However it is also important for the SSPX and the CDF/Ecclesia Dei to affirm Church doctrine.-Lionel Andrades

Image result for photo huh?

JANUARY 7, 2017

Bishop Schneider wants the SSPX to overlook this theological and doctrinal error in the Church and accept a personal prelature without 'Rome coming back to the faith'.

NOVEMBER 24, 2016

There are reports which say that with reference to the dubbia of the four cardinals Pope Francis has cited Vatican Council II.On this issue the four cardinals and bishop Athanasius Schneider have not responded.

OCTOBER 27, 2016

Until Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider affirm Feeneyism as a salvation theology they will not be able to interpret Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of continuity.Vatican Council II will continue to be a rupture with Tradition.

MAY 17, 2016

May be someone who is in contact with Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider could ask them these two questions and send me their response

APRIL 25, 2016

Bishop Athanasius Schneider misses the bus again

FEBRUARY 5, 2016

Bishop Schneider let us know what you believe on exclusive salvation. You are a shepherd.

FEBRUARY 4, 2016

Bishop Schneider like Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and SSPX bishops and priests confuses what is invisible as being visible.Card. Gerhard Muller and Pope Francis do the same.So Vatican Council II becomes a break with the past

FEBRUARY 3, 2016

Bishop Schneider expediently does not comment on the error in the Baltimore Catechism and its link to Vatican Council II

Related imageRelated image
No statement from cardinals and bishops criticizing the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith's approval of the political document on the Jews

The Baltimore Catechism error is not just a theoretical oversight it had practical consequences, penalties were placed on Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center. There was an excommunication.

Vatican Council II is 'hate' without an irrationality used in the interpretation : Fr. James Martin S.J will not affirm this Council

 MARCH 27, 2015

Vatican Council in general is being interpreted with an irrationality.Catholics do not know that there is a choice.Eliminate the premise and the Council dramatically changes

DECEMBER 22, 2014

If a pope uses the irrational premise and comes to an irrational conclusion it still is an objective error, even if he is the pope

JUNE 1, 2015

BRUARY 9, 2016

If any pope or religious, uses an irrational premise and inference to interpret magisterial documents, including Vatican Council II, the conclusion has to be irrational, non traditional- and heretical

Immagine correlata

SEPTEMBER 26, 2015

Magisterium should apologise to the SSPX for the excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre

Muller, Di Noia and Fellay made an objective error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and traditionalists are in a fix. They cannot correct me and neither do they want to say that they were wrong all these years and have been interpreting Vatican Council II with an irrational reasoning

The Holy See 

In Dominus Iesus Cardinal Ratzinger chose the irrational inference and rejected the traditional dogma on salvation

Archbishop Lefebvre made a mistake with the Letter of the Holy Office and carried it over into Vatican Council II


Related imageRelated image

JUNE 8, 2016

We see this conditioning in the irrational reasoning of Cardinal Gerhard Muller, Archbishop Augistine Di Noia and Bishop Bernard Fellay :it was accepted by Lefebvre,Hildebrand,Davis and Mattei


No comments: