Bishop Kevin McDonald, Roman Catholic bishops spokesman on inter-religious dialogue in England and meritus Bishop of Southwark, on Youtube, has interpreted Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with irrational Cushingism instead of traditional Feeneyism. He has used in irrational premise to create a new and non traditional conclusion.It has what Pope Benedict XVi referred to as the hermeneutic of rupture.
Comment on Youtube:
Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism and the conclusion is different.
Similarly the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance can be interpreted with an irrational premise or without this premise and the conclusion is different.
The English bishops like the present liberal magisterium at the Vatican use Cushingism.
Fr.Leonard Feeney was interpreting EENS and BOD and I.I without the mixing up invisible cases as being visible.
So the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church has not changed unless one is using an irrational premise.
There are not visible cases of the baptism of desire (BOD) etc .So the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston made an objective error. It assumed people who could only be known to God were also personally known on earth to be exceptions to EENS.
The Bishop is interpreting Vatican Council II and the dogma EENS with irrational Cushingism which is a violation of the Principle of Non Contradiction. For St.Benedict, St.Francis of Assisi and the popes of old the English bishop would be teaching heresy.-Lionel Andrades