Archbishop Guido Pozzo ,Ecclesia Dei, Vatican once again has issued his fake news on Vatican Council II. He states in an interview that ' in interpreting the documents of Vatican II, one clear principle would be continuity: that if an understanding of the Council’s message involves a break with the constant teaching of the Church, “this intepretation must be rejected as false or inadequate.'1
Fake News Guido Pozzo knows that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Feeneyism or Cushingism.He is obligated by the Jewish Left, to choose Cushingism.This is the official philosophy and theology of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
With Cushingism most Church documents are a rupture with Tradition.The traditionalists and sedevacantists influenced by Archbishop Lefebvre are cluelesss.
For me Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.
For me the Nicene Creed is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.
For me the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite. I avoid the New Theology, which is based on Cushngism.They use it.
For me the Catechism of the Catholic Church is Feeneyite they interpret it with Cushingism.
For Bishop Bernard Fellay and Archbishop Guido Pozzo Vatican Council II( Cushingite) is a rupture with Tradition.This is a break with the constant teaching of the Church.One clear principle here is dis-continuity.
The Council’s message (with Cushingism) involves a break with the constant teaching of the Church.
They are not aware of Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) or do not want to choose it.
Vatican Council II( Cushingite) is a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite).This is a break with the constant teaching of the Church.One clear principle here is dis-continuity.
The Council’s message ( Cushingism) involves a break with the constant teaching of the Church.
Yet Guido Pozzo, Vatican diplomat is trying to show the world that the CDF interprets Vatican Council II with the principle of continuity and not as a break with the constant teaching of the Church.
In an interview with Edward Pentin for the National Catholic Register, Cardinal Muller and Archbishop Di Noia affirmed extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Cushingite) and Vatican Council II ( Cushingite).This is a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) and Vatican Council II ( Feneeyite).
For the CDF and Ecclesia Dei there is no continuity with the past.In principle with the use of Cushingism as a philosophy and theology they have rejected the past and Bishop Fellay and the SSPX bishops and priests act as if they don't know what is happening.
In an interview with Edward Pentin for the National Catholic Register, Cardinal Muller and Archbishop Di Noia affirmed extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Cushingite) and Vatican Council II ( Cushingite).This is a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) and Vatican Council II ( Feneeyite).
For the CDF and Ecclesia Dei there is no continuity with the past.In principle with the use of Cushingism as a philosophy and theology they have rejected the past and Bishop Fellay and the SSPX bishops and priests act as if they don't know what is happening.
Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) is a rupture with Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).This is a break with the constant teaching of the Church. One clear principle here is dis-continuity.
https://gloria.tv/#2~news
It is a rupture with the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite).It is heretical.This is a break with the constant teaching of the Church.One clear principle here is dis-continuity.
Fakes news CDF will not respond to these blog posts,since the Vatican is under threat from the Left and they are trying to keep everything together by compromising with evil and issuing false information about Catholic doctrines, theology and magisterial documents.- Lionel Andrades
1.
March 21, 2017
Vatican Official Confirms Agreement with SSPX http://eponymousflower.blogspot.it/2017/03/vatican-official-confirms-agreement.html
TERMS EXPLAINED
Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.
Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS.There are exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Catholic Church for salvation.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle, according to Cushingism, hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.
Baptism of Desire (Feeneyite): It refers to the hypothetical case of an unknown catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is an invisible case in our reality it is not relevant to the dogma EENS.
Baptism of Desire (Cushingite): It refers to the known case (not hypothetical) of a catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is 'a visible case', for Cushingites, it is relevant to the dogma EENS. If it was invisible and unknown it would not be relevant or an exception to the dogma EENS( Feeneyite)
Invincible Ignorance ( Feeneyite): This refers to the hypothetical case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.
Invincible Ignorance (Cushingite): This refers to the explicit case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.Since it is an exception to the dogma EENS since it is assumed to be objectively known in particular cases.This reasoning is irrational and was the Cushingite philosophy and new theology in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.The erroe was also placed in Vatican Council II (LG 14 etc).
Council of Florence: One of the three Councils which defined the dogma EENS.It did not mention any exceptions.It did not mention the baptism of desire. It was Feeneyite.
Liberal theologians: They reinterpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as objective cases, known in the present times.They use Cushingism. St.Thomas Aquinas' man in the foreset in invincible ignorance would be a personally known case for them. Similarly the Council of Trent mentioning the case of the catechuman who desired the baptism of water and is saved, would also be an objective and personally known case for them.
Vatican Council II (Feeneyite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases, which are unknown personally in the present times.So Vatican Council II is not a break with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite-one baptism),the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State( since all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell).
Vatican Council II (Feeneyite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases, which are unknown personally in the present times.So Vatican Council II is not a break with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite-one baptism),the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State( since all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell).
Vatican Council II (Cushingite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer not to hypothetical but known cases in the present times. So Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the dogma EENS.
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston(overall): It assumed hypothetical cases were defacto known in the present times. So it presented the baptism of desire etc as an explicit exception, to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.Since they did not assume that the baptism of desire referred to a visible instead of invisible case.The Letter made the baptism of desire etc relevant to EENs.From the second part of this Letter has emerged the New Theology.It was Cushingite.
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 ( Feeneyite). It means accepting the Letter as Feeneyite based on the first part, only.It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.The traditional interpretatiion of the dogma EENS does not mention any exceptions.
Letter of the Holy Office ( Cushingite). It means accepting the Letter as Cushingite based on the second part of the Letter.It rejects the traditional interpretation of EENS. Since it considers the baptism of desire ( Cushingite-explicit) and being saved in invincible ignorance ( Cushingite-explicit cases) as being exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).It worngly assumes hypothetical cases are objectively visible and so they are exceptions to the first part of the Letter. The second part of the Letter contradicts the first part.
Baltimore Catechism: It assumed that the desire for the baptism of an unknown catechumen, who dies before receiving it and was saved, was a baptism like the baptism of water. So it was placed in the Baptism Section of the catechism. In other words it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire is visible and repeatable like the baptism of water or that we can administer it like the baptism of water.The Baltimore Catechism is accepted with this confusion.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.
Catechism of Pope X: It followed the Baltimore Catechism and placed the baptism of desire in the Baptism Section.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism. For instance, it affirms the Feeneyite understanding of the dogma on all needing to be incorporated into the Catholic Church as members.However when it refers to invincible ignorance, this can be interpreted with Feeneyism ( not an exception to EENS) or Cushingism ( an exception to all needing to be members of the Church for salvation).
Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite): It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and means there is one known baptism.It is the baptism of water.It is Feeneyite.
Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite): It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and means there is one known baptism.It is the baptism of water.It is Feeneyite.
Nicene Creed ( Cushingite) ; It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' and is interpreted as saying 'I believe in three or more known baptisms. They are water, blood, desire, seeds of the Word etc'.This is a Cushingite interpretation. This is the common understanding during the Oath and Vows for religious with the Nicene Creed and the Renwal of Baptismal vows by the laity during Holy Mass.
New Theology: It refers to the new theology in the Catholic Church based on hypothetical cases being objective in the present times.So it eliminates the dogma EENS.With the dogma EENS made obsolete the ecclesiology of the Church changes. There is a new ecclesiology which is a break with the past ecclesiocentrism of Tradition.The basis of the New Theology is Cushingism.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Feeneyite): It refers to the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries.There are no known exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church, with faith and baptism, to avoid Hell. This was the interpretation known to the missionaries in the 16th century.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Cushingite): .It refers to the dogma but with exceptions.All do not need to defacto convert into the Church in the present times, since there are exceptions.
Catechism of the Catholic Church (Feeneyite): CCC 1257(The Necessity of Baptism) does not contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction. There are no known cases in the present times of ' God is not limited to the Sacraments'(CCC 1257).So when CCC 1257 says the Church knows of no means to eternal beatutude other than the baptism of water, there are no exceptions in the present times.So if any one does not need the Sacraments and is saved without it because theoretically God is not limites to the Sacraments, this would be a hypothetical and unknown case.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Cushingite): .It refers to the dogma but with exceptions.All do not need to defacto convert into the Church in the present times, since there are exceptions.
Catechism of the Catholic Church (Feeneyite): CCC 1257(The Necessity of Baptism) does not contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction. There are no known cases in the present times of ' God is not limited to the Sacraments'(CCC 1257).So when CCC 1257 says the Church knows of no means to eternal beatutude other than the baptism of water, there are no exceptions in the present times.So if any one does not need the Sacraments and is saved without it because theoretically God is not limites to the Sacraments, this would be a hypothetical and unknown case.
Also when CCC 846 says all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church it here accomodates Cushingite baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorace.We know that these are invisible cases. So CCC 846 does not contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).
Also when CCC 846 states all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church,CCC 846 does not contradict the Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvation. This is the Feeneyite way to interpret the
Catechism of the Catholic Church.
Catechism of the Catholic Church.
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite): CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction when it indicates all need the baptism of water but some do not.Also CCC 846 (Outside the Church there is no salvation) is based on the new theology, it is Cushingite and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite).It would be saying all need to defacto enter the Church for salvation but some do not need to. Also CCC 846(Outside the Chirch No Salvation) is based on the new theology.It is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite). It would suggest that all do not need to formally enter the Church.Or, all need to enter the Church except for those 'who know' and who are not in invincible ignorance.Or all need to enter the Church as members for salvation except for those who are saved with the baptism of desire and blood without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.These are some of the liberal interpretations when hypothetical and invisible cases are assumed to be non-hypothetical and visible in the interpretation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
Council of Trent : A Feeneyite does not separate the baptism of water from the baptism of desire.The baptism of desire will be followed by the baptism of water.
Council of Trent : A Cushingite separates the baptism of water from the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire excludes the baptism of water. -L.A
________________________
March 2, 2017
Who am I (Lionel) and what do I believe in ?
Posts
