EXCLUSIVE SALVATION IS COMMON IN BOTH RELIGIONS
In inter- religious dialogue Catholics can agree with Muslims on there being exclusive salvation in both religions for their believers.However the Muslim understanding of exclusive salvation in their Mohammadan religion is matched only with Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite).
NEW ECUMENISM WITH EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS
Similarly only with VC II ( Feeneyite) and EENS ( Feeneyite) we have much in common with Evangelical Christians. It's a different ecumenism.
DIALOGUE IS CONTROLLED AND CUSHINGITE
Since the present magisterium ( teaching authority of the Church) seems only aware of Cushingism, Catholic-Muslim inter religious dialogue is based on EENS( Cushingite-there are known exceptions to the dogma EENS) and Vatican Council II ( Cushingite-invisible cases are visible exceptions to EENS, Feeneyite).Dialogue is controlled.
POPE JOHN PAUL II CORRECTED CARD.RATZINGER
Cardinal Ratzinger approved the Cushingite theological paper of the International Theological Commission, Christianity and the World Religions, 1996.It set basic principles for ecumenism and dialogue based upon allegedly known salvation outside the Church, practical exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).So the past ecclesiocentrism based on EENS ( Feeneyite) was put aside.Pope John Paul II however made Cardinal Ratzinger issue a CDF Notification on the book by Fr. Jacques Dupuis s.j.The pope opposed a Christian theology of religions.This was also an indirect correction of Cardinal Ratzinger and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J's new theolgy in 'Christianity and the World Religions'.
SCOTT HAHN, ROBERT SPENCER CUSHINGITES
Now when Scott Hahn and Robert Spencer discuss the two faiths in the University of Steubenville video above,it is as Cushingites, just like Ratzinger and Ladaria.
Spencer, a Catholic, however has to reject Vatican Council II (F) and EENS (F) to please the Jewish Left who finance him.He opposes radical Islam not as a Catholic but as a secular humanist.
THEOLOGICALLY A FALSE PREMISE CREATES A NON TRADITIONAL CONCLUSION
Similarly Scott Hahn and the professors at the University of Steubenville do not interpret Vatican Council II and EENS without the false premise and conclusion.Otherwise doctrinally and theologically they would be saying all Muslims are oriented to Hell with no exception in the present times.Since they die without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7, LG 14) needed for salvation.Outside the Church there is no salvation ( Council of Florence 1441, Athanasius Creed, Nicene Creed( Feeneyite) etc.).
INVISIBLE CASES CANNOT BE EXCEPTIONS TO EENS(FEENEYITE)
Unlike the Cushingite dialogue at the Gregorian University, Rome, Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite)has LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22,AG 11 ( seeds of the Word) etc refer to physically invisible cases on earth, past and present.Since they are invisible for us they cannot be exceptions to the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).
WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II(F) PROFESSORS ARE BACK TO THE OLD ECCLESIOCENTRISM ON ISLAM
So with Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) the professors would be back to the old ecclesiocentrism which tells us that all Muslims are on the way to Hell, without being incorprated into the Church as members; without 'faith and baptism'.
There would be no 'development of the dogma' as Pope Benedict XVI announced last March 2016.
DEVELOPMENT OF DOCTRINE ONLY IF INVISIBLE CASES ARE VISIBLE EXCEPTIONS TO EENS
There can only be a development of doctrine if invisible cases were visible and they were examples of salvation outside the Church.Then LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc would be visible and known exceptions, to all needing to be incorporated into the Church in 2017 for salvation.They would be politically correct, with Pope Benedict XVI.
LOCAL BISHOPS WOULD OBJECT
However in the video above the speakers left out the issue of salvation.Their local bishop at Steubenville and all the other USCCB bishops, interpret all magisterial documents with Cushingism.The Catholic professors are given the mandatum to teach theology only if they accept the Cushingite Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston.
MAGISTERIAL HERESY OBLIGATORY IN DIALOGUE
This Letter assumed invisible cases of the baptism of desire were visible exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).There were visible examples of salvation outside the Church, was the irrational premise.
This irrationality ,this magisterial heresy Scott Hahn and Catholic apologists(Catholic Answers, Catholics United for the Faith etc) are forced to use, to be considered Catholic by the Left.
SCOTT HAHN HAS TO USE THE FALSE PREMISE
Similarly it is only with the false premise that Scott Hahn must interpret Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and EENS, to create a new ecumenism,which is new in doctrine and theology.If he did not do this, he would affirm the old ecclesiology,in harmony with Vatican Council II, which says all Protestants and Orthodox Christians are outside the Church and on the way to the fires of Hell.They would be heretics and schismatics ( Cantate Domini, Council of Florence 1441) since there is exclusive salvation in the only Church which Jesus founded( John 3:5, Mark 16:16 etc).
EXCLUSIVE SALVATION FOR MUSLIMS SO NO SEPARATION OF RELIGION AND STATE
For Muslims there is exclusive salvation in their religion and so there is no separation of religion and State.There is no rupture between political Islam and the religious aspect.Political Islam reflects the Quran and Tradition( hadith) as interpreted by the different schools of Islam, recognised ( Sunni,Shia etc) and non recognised ( Qadiani/Mirzaite, Bahais etc).
WITH NEW THEOLOGY,CUSHINGISM THERE IS NO MORE EXCLUSIVE SALVATION : RESULT IS A SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
For Catholics, with the new theology of Cushingism, there is no more exclusive salvation in their religion.So there is a separation of Church and State.There is a rupture between political Catholicism today and the old ecclesiocentrism. Political Catholicism is Cushingite and reflects Church documents interpreted with Cushingism.There is no more a political Catholicism based on traditional doctrine and theology in harmony with Vatican Council II.Since Vatican Council II is magisterially interpreted only with Cushingism and so becomes a rupture with the past.
FOR MUSLIMS WITH EXCLUSIVE SALVATION THEY HAVE MISSION
For Muslims since there is exclusive salvation in their religion they have mission(dawah), outreach to the whole world.
FOR CATHOLICS THERE IS NO MORE EXCLUSIVE SALVATION AND SO NO OFFICIAL MISSION.
For Catholics there is no more exclusive salvation for the present magisterium, tossed around by the Jewish Left.So there is no official mission as in the past.Also what is considered mission is based on a vague Christology and not on an exclusivist ecclesiocentrism, as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.
So these would be the handicaps with which the professors at Steubenville, would have to enter inter-religious dialogue with Muslims and members of other religions.
If the Protestants and Muslims would call attention to Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and EENS ( Feeneyite) being rational and traditional and that Cushingism is based on deception and a lie and is unethical,then the two popes can correct the wrong theology and doctrine and 'Rome will return to the Faith once again'.
MILLIONS OF LAY CATHOLICS DUPED WITH FANTASY THEOLOGY, CUSHINGISM
Presently, lay Catholics, millions of them, are being duped with a fantasy theology, Cushingism.It infers that there are known people in Heaven saved without 'faith and baptism' in the Catholic Church.Or, there are known people on earth who will be saved without being a member of the Catholic Church.This deception is being officially maintained by the Jewish Left.
SUSPENSION FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT USE CUSHINGITE THEOLOGY
If any priest opposes it the Left will privately call for his suspension.Similarly they would demand the suspension of any professor at Steubenville, who affirms Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and EENS(Feeneyite).They would not permit the priest or professor to hold an office or be in the Church just as they objected to Bishop Richard Williamson, with the support of ecclesiastical Masonry.The bishop had not done anything wrong morally or canonically and initially Pope Benedict defended him.
FOR ME VATICAN COUNCIL II, THE CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND EENS IS FEENEYITE
For me as a layman, it is possible to affirm the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite),the Athanasius Creed( outside the Church there is no salvation),the Catechism of the Catholic Church 1995( Feeneyite), the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the three Church Councils,the first part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which is Feeneyite,the Council of Trent and the statements of popes and saints interpreted with the theology of outside the Church there is no known salvation and the philosophy of hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire etc are not physically known or visible in 2017.This is something obvious.It is common knowledge.We cannot see the dead who are now saved and in Heaven. So there are no practical exceptions to the dogma EENS.This is how I approach dialogue and mission, which is not separated for me-Lionel Andrades