The baptism of desire is no more an issue

The baptism of desire is no more an issue. The issue is whether you are interpreting it with Feeneyism or Cushingism, with hypothetical cases being just hypothetical or also defacto and objectively known in the present times.This is the issue which has not been touched in this long article.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/if-references-to-bodbob-and-ii-are.html

March 17, 2017

If the references to BOD,BOB and I.I are interpreted with Cushingism then it is irrational, non traditional and heretical.It is a rupture with the original sources  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/if-references-to-bodbob-and-ii-are.html

 

 

March 17, 2017

There is a difference between those who interpret BOD, BOB and I.I as being invisible or visible cases in the present times.It is the difference between Feeneyism and Cushingism, rationality and irrationality,being in accord with the Principle of Non Contradiction or violating it.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/there-is-difference-between-those-who.html

 

March 17, 2017

The practical result now is that Vatican Council II can be interpreted as a rupture or a continuity with the past, depending upon the use of the irrational premise; invisible cases are visible or not visible in 2017.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/the-practical-result-now-is-that.html