University of Nottingham professor maintains invisible cases are visible : irrational inference not professional or ethical

A University of Nottingham, U.K professor of theology still maintains that there are visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and so it never was absolutist.The professor is implying that we can physically see people in Heaven.They are a part of our visual reality and they are saved without being members of the Catholic Church. Or, he knows of  people on earth who will be saved outside the Church; without faith and the baptism of water.

Where are these exceptions ? I cannot see and meet any.

How could someone in the past see or meet someone in Heaven saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water and then come to tell us about it ? Does the Church recognise that there was some such a person on earth? No.

But invisible cases are visible for Prof.Tom O'Loughlin.

Without this inference ( invisible cases are visible) he could be out of his leftist university and without a job.

So the professor maintains invisible cases are visible, this is his philosophy.It is rational for him.He maintains the lie.

So based up on this new philosophy, his new theology says that there is known salvation outside the Church. The dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is not absolutist. There is a new version of the dogma, with the new theology, with Cushingism.
IRRATIONAL PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY

1.He uses an irrational philosophy and theology to create a non traditional conclusion and this is not ethical for him.It is not a problem.
IRRATIIONAL PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY EXPRESSED IN VATICAN COUNCIL II

2.At Vatican Council II the Council Fathers also used this irrational philosophy and theology. He does not want to point it out. He simply repeats it.He supports the error. At Vatican Council II and the Holy Office 1949 they also like the British professor mistook hypothetical cases as not being hypothetical.So their inference and the conclusion was non traditional. It was a rupture with Tradition.The professor keeps this hidden.
HE WELCOMES THE ERROR IN VATICAN COUNCIL II

3.This is a mistake by human beings in Vatican Council II and cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit. He makes the same objective mistake and does not correct the human error in Vatican Council. In fact he welcomes it. This is unethical.He does not mention that there is a rational alternative interpretation of Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. 
WITHOUT THE IRRATIONAL PREMISE THERE IS ONLY THE OLD ECUMENISM

4.The new ecumenism is based on the irrational premise.Without it there is the old ecclesiocentrism.So there can only be the old ecumenism of return.The professor does not mention this. This would be deception.Since he has been informed.
OBJECTIVE MISTAKE IN THE FR.LEONARD FEENEY CASE

5.There was an objective mistake made in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and also in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case. Like the professor, the Letter from the Holy Office(CDF) in 1949 assumed that there were known exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is a factual mistake. It is a fact of life that we cannot see people in Heaven saved with the baptism of desire and without the baptism of water.
BAPTISM OF DESIRE AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE ARE NOT RELEVANT TO EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
It is a fact of life that we cannot judge and say that someone on earth will be saved without the baptism of water and instead with the baptism of desire.

Similarly if there is any one saved in invincible ignorance it would only be known to God.So it can be only a speculative and hypothetical case, for us humans. It is not a concrete person.So it is not relevant to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus, as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.For Prof. Tom O'Loughlin it is relevant.This non existing person exists in reality.
VATICAN COUNCIL II IN HARMONY WITH THE STRICT INTERPRETATION OF EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS6. He does not say that extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( without the premise) and Vatican Council II ( without the premise) are in harmony. Both these magisterial documents support the 'strict interpretation', the 'rigorist interpretation' of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Both these Church documents  tell us that all Jews and Muslims, besides other non Catholics, need to convert into the Catholic Church as members, to avoid the fires of Hell and there are no known exceptions in 2017.
THIS IS NOT THE TEACHING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT

So the professor on the video has calumniated Fr. Leonard Feeney and has not clarified that the reasoning in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Vatican Council II (LG 14, AG 7 etc which mention the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance ) are wrong. This is human error. It is not the teaching of the Holy Spirit or the magisterium of the past. So an injustice was done to the American Jesuit,mentioned on the video.

DECEPTION AND LIE 
The University of Nottingham professor maintains a deception and lie. This is dishonest, unethical and not Catholic.It is also not professional for a university professor in England.- Lionel Andrades

MARCH 10, 2017

For the English bishops and the Masons there is only EENS Cushingite.This is how they interpret EENS historically.They have created a new extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/for-english-bishops-and-masons-there-is.html

March 8, 2017

No denial from Archbishop Kevin Mcdonald, Tom O' Loughlin : there is an objective error in the text of Vatican Council II  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/no-denial-from-archbishop-kevin.html

MARCH 10, 2017

For the English bishops and the Masons there is only EENS Cushingite.This is how they interpret EENS historically.They have created a new extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/for-english-bishops-and-masons-there-is.html

March 9, 2017

The dogma is absolutist and we do not know any one who is saved or going to be saved in another religion. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/the-dogma-is-absolutist-and-we-do-not.html

MARCH 4, 2017
English universities present a lie on Catholic theology and doctrine - unethical for academics http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/english-universities-present-lie-on.html


MARCH 3, 2017
Adult Catholic tells lies on Internet

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/adult-catholic-tells-lies-on-internet.html

MARCH 9, 2017

The dogma is absolutist and we do not know any one who is saved or going to be saved in another religion.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/the-dogma-is-absolutist-and-we-do-not.html

MARCH 8, 2017

English universities tell a lie and no priest objects

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/english-universities-tell-lie-and-no.html

MARCH 4, 2017

English universities present a lie on Catholic theology and doctrine - unethical for academics

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/english-universities-present-lie-on.html

 MARCH 3, 2017

Gaudium et Specs 22 does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : English bishop tells a lie

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/gaudium-et-specs-22-does-not-contradict.html

MARCH 2, 2017

English bishop indicates pope was wrong

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/english-bishop-indicates-pope-was-wrong.html

 MARCH 2, 2017

English liberal bishop uses straw man arguement

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/english-liberal-bishop-uses-straw-man.html

MARCH 1, 2017

English Bishop interprets Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with irrational Cushingism

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/english-bishop-interprets-vatican.html