BISHOP MORLINO USES CUSHINGISM A FALSE THEOLOGY
Today we see the photographs and news about Pope Francis and Pope Benedict XVI in the mainstream media. It is because they interpret the Catechism with Cushingism. If Bishop Morlino does not do the same and instead uses Feeneyism as an interpretation he would be persona non grata.
ALL LAY STUDY GROUPS HAVE TO USE THE FALSE THEOLOGY IN MADISON
So now based on a false theology -on what is invisible being visible and what is implicit being explicit- the bishop in Madison interprets the Catechism of the Catholic Church and every one has to do the same in the diocese.
WITH CUSHINGISM CATECHISM VIOLATES PRINCIPLE OF NON CONTRADICTION
The priests at Madision offer Mass ad orientem and give the Eucharist on the tongue and assume CCC 1257 contradicts itself and the Principle of Non Contradiction and they accept this !.The interpretation of CCC 1257 commonly assumes what is visible and known are examples of salvation outside the Church.It is inferred in Madison that they know when 'God is not limited to the Sacraments' and someone will be saved outside the Church.This is Cushingism!
CCC 1257 DOES NOT CONTRADICT ITSELF WITH FEENEYISM
There are no such known people.So CCC 1257 does not contradict itself or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.This would be Feeneyism!
So how can Bishop Robert C.Morlino offer Mass ad orientem and with the theology of Feeneyism?
If he says God the Father wants all people to be united in the Catholic Church, the Church is the only Ark of Noah that saves in the Flood(CCC 845) this would be the old ecclesiology according to the 16th century magisterium.It would be the Catechism interpreted with Feeneyism.
If he says all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church (CCC 846) and this does not contradict the dogma EENS, he would be affirming the old ecclesiology of the Traditional Latin Mass.Feeneyism!
If he says everyone needs the baptism of water in the Catholic Church for salvation (CCC 1257) and the Church knows of no exceptions in 2017 he would be affirming the old ecclesiology on outside the Church there is no salvation.He would be interpreting the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism (CCC 1257).
If he says the Patriach of the Russian Orthodox Church and the Primates of the Anglican Church in England are on the way to Hell (CCC 846/Ad Gentes 7( AG 7 is listed in CCC 846),CCC 845, CCC 1257) then the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church before and after Vatican Council II would be the same.The ecclesiology would be ecclesiocentric. There would be no rupture with Tradition. This would be Feeneyism.
Since outside the Church there is no known salvation, and all need to enter the Church in 2017( and not just those who know) there should be no separation of Church and State for him. Christ should be King over all political legislation.This would be Feeneyism too.It is the same Catechism but with a different premise and conclusion.
He would be affirming traditional Catholic doctrine, offering the Traditional Latin Mass and not rejecting the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite) or Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).
AVOIDS SSPX CUSHINGITE ERROR
Neither would he be a traditionalist like the members of the SSPX who interpret the Catechism and Vatican Council II with Cushingism and then reject the obvious non-traditional conclusion.
POPE BENEDICT MADE AN OBJECTIVE MISTAKE IN MARCH 2016
Bishop Morlino could show Pope Benedict XVI his error and ask him to interpret the Catechism and Vatican Council II with Feeneyism, even if the Jewish Left and the Masons do not like it.Ask him to switch to rational and traditional Feeneyism( invisible cases are not visible in 2017, so there are no visible exceptions to traditional EENS as it was known to the 16th century missionaries).
POPE BENEDICT MUST BE SHOWN HIS MISTAKE
Pope Benedict needs to be shown that he made a mistake in March 2016, when in the daily Avvenire , he said extra ecclesiam nulla salus was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.Since there was a development with Vatican Council II ( Vatican Council II Cushingite of course).
NO DEVELOPMENT OF EENS WITH THEOLOGY OF FEENEYISM
With Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite) there is no development of the dogma EENS as it was known in the 16th century.
With the Catechism and Vatican Council II being Feeneyite there is no Anonymous Christian who is saved outside the Catholic Church.
CATECHISM STUDY GROUPS MUST BE ALLOWED TO USE RATIONAL AND TRADITIONAL FEENEYISM
So in the diocese of Madison, USA it is Bishop Robert C.Morlino who needs to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism and then the lay people can do the same in their study groups.-Lionel Andrades