[5] Jesus answered: Amen, amen I say to thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
[5] Unless a man be born again: By these words our Saviour hath declared the necessity of baptism; and by the word water it is evident that the application of it is necessary with the words. Matt. 28. 19.-Douay-Rheims Bible
CANON I.-If any one saith, that the baptism of John had the same force as the baptism of Christ; let him be anathema.
CANON II.-If any one saith, that true and natural water is not of necessity for baptism, and, on that account, wrests, to some sort of metaphor, those words of our Lord Jesus Christ; Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost; let him be anathema.
CANON III.-If any one saith, that in the Roman church, which is the mother and mistress of all churches, there is not the true doctrine concerning the sacrament of baptism; let him be anathema.
CANON IV.-If any one saith, that the baptism which is even given by heretics in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, with the intention of doing what the Church doth, is not true baptism; let him be anathema.
CANON V.-If any one saith, that baptism is free, that is, not necessary unto salvation; let him be anathema.
CANON VI.-If any one saith, that one who has been baptized cannot, even if he would, lose grace, let him sin ever so much, unless he will not believe; let him be anathema.
CANON VII.-If any one saith, that the baptized are, by baptism itself, made debtors but to faith alone, and not to the observance of the whole law of Christ; let him be anathema.
CANON VIII.-If any one saith, that the baptized are freed from all the precepts, whether written or transmitted, of holy Church, in such wise that they are not bound to observe them, unless they have chosen of their own accord to submit themselves thereunto; let him be anathema.
[Page 57] CANON IX.-If any one saith, that the resemblance of the baptism which they have received is so to be recalled unto men, as that they are to understand, that all vows made after baptism are void, in virtue of the promise already made in that baptism; as if, by those vows, they both derogated from that faith which they have professed, and from that baptism itself; let him be anathema.
CANON X.-If any one saith, that by the sole remembrance and the faith of the baptism which has been received, all sins committed after baptism are either remitted, or made venial; let him be anathema.
CANON XI.-If any one saith, that baptism, which was true and rightly conferred, is to be repeated, for him who has denied the faith of Christ amongst Infidels, when he is converted unto penitence; let him be anathema.
CANON XII.-If any one saith, that no one is to be baptized save at that age at which Christ was baptized, or in the very article of death; let him be anathema.
CANON XIII.-If any one saith, that little children, for that they have not actual faith, are not, after having received baptism, to be reckoned amongst the faithful; and that, for this cause, they are to be rebaptized when they have attained to years of discretion; or, that it is better that the baptism of such be omitted, than that, while not believing by their own act, they should be bapized in the faith alone of the Church; let him be anathema.
CANON XIV.-If any one saith, that those who have been thus baptized when children, are, when they have grown up, to be asked whether they will ratify what their sponsors promised in their names when they were baptized; and that, in case they answer that they will not, they are to be left to their own will; and are not to be compelled meanwhile to a Christian life by any other penalty, save that they be excluded from the participation of the Eucharist, and of the other sacraments, until they repent; let him be anathema.
Canon 2. If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ:
Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, let him be anathema.-Council of Trent
The Bible, Council of Trent and pre 1949 Catholic Tradition says the baptism of water is necessary for salvation.The dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus defined by three Church Councils confirms that the baptism of water in the Catholic Church is necessary for salvation.
The Council of Trent says 'let him be anathema' who does not believe in this .
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 issued by Cardinal Francesco Selvaggiani and approved by the Holy Office in Rome and the Archbishop of Boston,says the baptism of water is not always necessary.There are exceptions to Jesus' teaching in John 3:5.This Letter has been placed in the Denzinger by Fr. Karl Rahner and has been approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger.
Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member- Letter of the Holy Office 1949
Lionel : ' it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member'. This is heresy.
Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member, but it is necessary that at least he be united to her by desire and longing.-Letter of the Holy Office 1949
Lionel: This is heresy based on an irrationality.There are no practical exceptions to all needing the baptism of water in the Church for salvation. There are no known cases for example in 2017 of someone saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.
A theoretical or hypothetical case cannot be an exception to all needing the baptism of water in the Catholic Church in 2017.
If someone was allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the past centuries he or she could not be an exception to all needing the baptism of water in 2017.
Yet the Letter of the Holy Office says that it is not always required to be incorporated into the Church actually as a member.
This is magisterial heresy. This is the false church within the Catholic Church.
With these wise words he reproves both those who exclude from eternal salvation all united to the Church only by implicit desire-Letter of the Holy Office 1949
Lionel: The Letter reproves Fr. Leonard Feeney for saying that all need the baptism of water in the Catholic Church for salvation and that the baptism of desire etc are not exceptions.
The Magisterium is affirming a heretical position and is reproving the priest for affirming the traditional and orthodox teaching on baptism.
___________________________
In His infinite mercy God has willed that the effects, necessary for one to be saved, of those helps to salvation which are directed toward man's final end, not by intrinsic necessity, but only by divine institution, can also be obtained in certain circumstances when those helps are used only in desire and longing.-Letter of the Holy Office 1949
Lionel: So a hypothetical and theoretical case here is considered relavent and an exception to Jesus' teaching on all needing the baptism of water.
According to the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 there is known salvation outside the Church. This is heresy and a new doctrine. It is the basis of the new theology and was incorporated into Vatican Council II.
It is supported by the two popes and all the cardinals and bishops and it is the stuff of anathema.
-Lionel Andrades
APRIL 12, 2017
Let Holy Office 1949 and the Archbishop of Boston be anathema?They were teaching heresy. There are no known cases of the baptism of desire and they postulated exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/let-holy-office-1949-and-archbishop-of.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment