Wednesday, April 19, 2017

Pope Benedict XVI could have interpreted Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in March 2016 with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism: he chose heresy and the hermeneutic of rupture

Benedict XVI could have interpreted Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), in March 2016 with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism.If he chose Feeneyism ( no visible exceptions to EENS, invisible baptism of desire is not visible in 2016) then Vatican Council II could not have 'evolved', there would not be ' a development'.However with Cushingism as the new theology, LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to physically visible cases, allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. They are explicit exceptions to all needing to enter the Church with 'faith and baptism' for salvation.Vatican Council II (Cushingite-with invisible baptism of desire being visible) is a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite). There is also a new EENS, it is EENS ( Cushingite) in which there are exceptions to all needing to fomally enter the Church.

For Pope Benedict there is salvation outside the Church.So the Oath Against Modernism is irrelevant for him, since Vatican Council II is  break with EENS.Also EENS is no more a dogma for him since he has discovered 'known' salvation outside the Church. Vatican Council II always has a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition and he confirmed it in public, finally.In the interview published in Avvenire in March 2016 he said with  blatant heresy that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries of the 16th century.One magisterium changes and rejects a dogma accepted by a previous magisterium. The Holy Spirit guides the magisterium and so for the present magisterium the Holy Spirit has a new revelation in the Catholic Church and so has changed and rejected the old interpretation of EENS for Pope Benedict.
So he chose Cushingism instead of Feeneyism, I repeat.He is a modernist, heretic, non traditionalist and liberal pope.He is pro-Mason and supports the new world order, the emerging one world religion.He has allowed our understanding of the Nicene Creed to change ( I believe in three known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins) and this is first class heresy according to one of the 'magisterial' documents he issued as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
He was interpreting Vatican Council II by assumimg hypothetical cases were defacto exceptions to EENS and this was the doctrine he wanted the SSPX to accept for canonical status.Then he pontificated that the SSPX issue is not one of discipline but of doctrine.

I mentioned in a prevous blog post yesterday night that in  March 2016, Pope Benedict XVI, in the daily Avvenire stated, that extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) was no more like it was for the 16th century missionaries. He said that the dogma had evolved with Vatican Council II.1 He meant Vatican Council II ( Cushingism) assumed there are visible and known exceptions to the dogma EENS and he accepts this. So for him there is salvation outside the Church. LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, unlike for me, would refer to physically visible and known cases for Pope Benedict. This is modernism.He has changed the Catholic identity.Pope Benedict XVI during his liturgy contradicts the Oath Against Modernism.The same modernism is supported by the Society of St. Pius X and sedevacantist bishops and priests who have had their formation under Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.It is modernism during their liturgy.
The Oath Against Modernism is now meaningless. Even Bishop Athanasius Schneider who has called for a Syllabus of Errors on Vatican Council II, interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.He is a modernist at the Traditional Latin Mass.1
-Lionel Andrades
April 18, 2017
Pope Benedict XVI during his liturgy contradicts the Oath Against Modernism
Emeritus Benedict XVI. spoke to the Church crisis in the interview:
"The missionaries of the 16th century were convinced that the unbaptized were lost forever. After the Council this conviction was abandoned. This resulted in a deep crisis. Without being bound to salvation the faith is baseless."'
Lionel: This 'conviction' was abandoned since Pope Benedict interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.
With Feeneyism 'all', need 'faith and baptism' for 'salvation'(Ad Gentes 7) and LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, GS 22,UR 3 etc refer to hypothetical cases. So they cannot be exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.They were never even relevant to EENs until liberal theologians in Baltimore and Boston made them relevant.
According to Vatican Council II ( Ad Gentes 7, Lumen Gentium 14) most people are oriented to the fires of Hell since they die without 'faith and baptism' in the Catholic Church.
So with Vatican Council II there is no change in the ecclesiology of the Church. The pre-Vatican Council II ecclesiology on ecumenism and inter-religious dialogue has not changed since EENS has not changed.Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.
Father Servais asked Benedict XVI. about the justification dispute of Martin Luther and the struggle of St. Francis de Sales, who had followed in the wake of the Apostle Paul for the pastoral care of as many "infidels" as possible against the "terrible fate being eternally lost." Benedict XVI. proceeds in his reply in detail on the "development of this dogma" Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus, because since the beginning of modern times, the historical perspectives with respect to the Middle Ages had changed "radically".
Lionel: There has to be ' a development of the dogma' for him since his premise and conclusion is non traditional and irrational. A different premise ( invisible people are visible) produces a different conclusion( invisible people are visible exceptions to EENS).

By giving the up the Church's necessity for salvation, the Council sparked a "double crisis"

Lionel: He has given up the Church's necessity for salvation with his interpretation of Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of rupture.We have not. Discerning Catholics have not done so.
"Double crisis" of Church and Faith

Thus, with the fact that the Second Vatican Council has "definitely" abandoned the belief that there is no salvation for unbaptized, the Church and the faith had fallen into a "double crisis".
Lionel: 'Definitely abandoned the belief for unbaptized' ? This is the innovation of the new theology, the Rahner-Ratzinger new theology which he defended within the Church as the Prefect of the CDF. He also excommunicated Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre for not accepting Vatican Council II interpreted with his new Cushingite theology which was modernism; magisterial modernism.-L.A.


No comments: