The Archbishop of Palermo Corrado Lorefice is in heresy and he cannot deny it.He's not denying it.
EVERY ONE BELEIVES THIS
EVERY ONE BELEIVES THIS
If this issue was brought before him in personal conversation all he could say weakly is that every one believes this and this teaching is magisterial.He would have to agree that every one like him is making an objective mistake, there is a factual error.Upon this error( invisible baptism of desire is visible) a new theology has been created. When this new theology is used to interpret Vatican Council II the conclusion is irrational, non traditional and heretical.
When this new theology is replaced with Feeneyism, which does not have the irrational premise of Cushingism, Vatican Council II is traditional and in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.
I BELIEVE IN THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE
I BELIEVE IN THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE
Secondly, Archbishop Lorefice could use the common weak argument, which is not relevant to the issue. He could say that he believes in the baptism of desire.
So what ? Even I, Lionel, believe in the baptism of desire and all magisterial documents and my conclusion and interpretations are different from his. Since he interprets the baptism of desire with Cushingism and I do so with Feeneyism.So for him visible for us baptism of desire is an exception to the dogma EENS for me invisible baptism of desire is not an exception or relevant to EENS.
LAITY,RELIGIOUS SISTERS RECEIVE THE EUCHARIST WITH HERESY
LAITY,RELIGIOUS SISTERS RECEIVE THE EUCHARIST WITH HERESY
So if I was in Palermo I would go up to receive the Eucharist affirming the Nicene Creed ( I believe in one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins). The laity and religious sisters there would receive the Eucharist believing 'I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins, water,desire,blood, invincible ignorance, seeds of the word(AG 11), imperfect communion with the Church)YR 3), elements of sanctification and truth(LG 8) etc,with or without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church' .The meaning and interpretation of the Nicene Creed has been changed.This is heresy.If it was professed knowingly it would be a sin of faith, a mortal sin. It would be a first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II.
Yet no one discusses this issue at Palermo.There is no statement from the archbishop or the priests there and none from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
-Lionel Andrades
APRIL 12, 2017
The laity of Palermo must point out to the two popes and the Archbsihop that there is no visible case of the baptism of desire
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/the-laity-of-palermo-must-point-out-to.html
I laici di Palermo bisogna precisare ai due papi e l'archvescoco di Palemo che non c'è nessun caso visibile del battesimo di desiderio
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/i-laici-di-palermo-bisogna-precisare-ai.html
APRIL 12, 2017
Archbishop Corrado Lorefice supports anathema and heresy contradicts Jesus' teaching and the Council of Trent
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/arcivescovo-corrado-lorefice-supports.html
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/arcivescovo-corrado-lorefice-supports.html
Pontificato ha respinto diritto canonico o due papi e Arcivescovo Corrado Lorefice potrebbe accusato di eresia
Present pontificate has put aside Canon Law.Otherwise two popes and Abp.Corrado Lorefice could be accused of heresy
April 9, 2017
Present Magisterium is misusing the word 'Magisterium': Fr.Alessandro Minutella was suspended for not accepting heresy and false theology and doctrines
No comments:
Post a Comment