I have mentioned in a previous post 1 that Vatican Council II, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1995) can be interpreted with the theology of Cushingism or Feeneyism.Fr. Z refuses to address this point.
Similarly over the years I have mentioned that the Catechism of the Council of Trent, the Baltimore Catechism and the Catechism of St.Pius X can also be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism and the conclusion would be different.Fr. Z refuses to address this point.
Liberal theologians have interpreted all these documents with Cushingism and they have been supported by the magisterium. This was official since 1949.It was when the new theology, Cushingite theology was officially accepted.It was also the theology of Vatican Council II.
However the liberals at Vatican Council may be were not aware that there was a weak point with Cushingism, there was a built- in error. Once it was avoided the interpretation again becomes traditional Feeneyite theology.
Now we know that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Feeneyism and so the Council would be in harmony with all the Catechisms interpreted only with Feeneyism.This would mean that the ecclesiology of the Church on mission, ecumenism, inter-religious dialogue, non separation of Church and State and the theology of the liturgy would be the same before and after Vatican Council II.The ecclesiology would be the same on faith( salvation) and morals without the subjectivism -error.Subjectivism( being able to judge the un-judgeable as an exception to the general rule on faith and morals) is the basis of Cushingism as a philosophy and theology.An irrational premise is used to elicit a non traditional conclusion and this non traditional conclusion is now considered a magisterial interpretation of the Catechism( 1995).This error is supported by Fr. John Zuhlsdorf.Fr. Z refuses to address this point over the last few years -L.A
From Fr. John Zuhlsdorf's blog WDTPS