Canon Law would also apply in future to the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) in the diocese of Bishop Alain Planet, bishop of Carcassonne,in France.1
Similar to Catholics in the diocese of Palermo 2 laity could appeal against Bishop Planet and the SSPX.According to Canon Law bishops are to affirm Catholic teachings in especially the Nicene Creed.
Bishop Planet and Bishop Fellay could be asked to affirm Catholic teachings interpreted with the rational theology of Feeneyism( invisible cases are not visible).Also they could be informed that the laity will not any more affirm magisterial documents with the irrational theology of Cushingism(invisible baptism of desire is a visible exception to the dogma EENS).
Bishop Alain Planet and the SSPX use an irrational and false theology to interpret magisterial documents.They will not use the theology of Feeneyism to interpret Vatican Council II, since then the Council will be in step with the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation ( Feeneyite).The Council will then support the old ecclesiology of the Church which states all non Christians and non Catholics are on the way to Hell unless they become members of the Catholic Church.This is contrary to the Masonic and one world religion supported by the political Left.
Archbishop Corrado Lorefice of Palermo who suspended Fr.Alessandro M.Minutella, a Parish Priest has no denial to a report sent to him and other officials of the diocese.The archbishop was asked to please affirm Catholic doctrine in accord with magisterial documents of the Catholic Church, including Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite).It is now confirmed.He is unable to do it! The situation is the same in Carcassonne, France.
He was asked if the Archdiocese could confirm if they have been teaching doctrinal heresy all these years supported by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the two popes.There is no denial from Palermo.
It was pointed out to him that as a Catholic layman I Lionel Andrades affirm the magisterial documents of the Catholic Church and it differs from him and that of the Cushingite Archdiocese of Palermo.
1.The laity could inform Bishop Alain Planet and the SSPX that as Catholics they affirm that 'All Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists and other non Catholics,Protestants, Pentecostals,Orthodox Christians and other Christians, atheists and other non believers in God, need to formally enter the Catholic Church with 'faith and baptism(Ad Gentes 7,Lumen Gentium 14 Vatican Council II)to avoid the fires of Hell and to go to Heaven .They all need to be incorporated into the Church with no known exceptions, according to Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus'.
DIOCESE MUST AFFIRM CATHOLIC DOCTRINE
2.The laity could tell him that as good Catholics and in line with Catholic Tradition ,' they affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) in which Lumen Gentium 16, Lumen Gentium 8, Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Nostra Aetate 2, Gaudium et Spes 22, Lumen Gentium 14 etc refer to physically invisible cases; hypotetical cases and not people personally known in the present times.
So could the SSPX and Bishop Planet also please affirm this traditional doctrinal teaching of the Church.The issue here is doctrine and not pastoral approach or theological praxis.'
LAITY MUST REFUSE TO INTERPRET THE NICENE CREED WITH CUSHINGISM
3.The laity could inform the SSPX and the Bishop of Carcassonne that when they pray the Nicene Creed at Holy Mass they mean that they believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins, one known baptism, the baptism of water.There are not three known baptisms. The baptism of desire and blood cannot be administered like the baptism of water, they cannot be physically seen or repeated like the baptism of water.The baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are always physically invisible for us in 2017.' So the laity could appeal to Bishop Fellay and Bishop Planet to please affirm the Nicene Creed with rationality and advise every one in the diocese to do the same.
THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE IS ALWAYS INVISIBLE, THEORETICAL AND HYPOTHETICAL FOR US THIS IS COMMON SENSE
4.The laity must tell the dissenting bishops that 'they accept the baptism of desire as being a hypothetical case, irrespective if it is theoretically followed by the baptism of water or excludes it.The baptism of desire is always invisible and never visible for us human beings.So it cannot be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 2017. An alleged possibility in the past cannot be an exception to all needing to enter the Church with faith and baptism in 2017. This is common sense. This is also the traditional magisterium of the Church over the centuries'.
CANON LAW MUST ALSO APPLY TO THE CARDINALS AT THE CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH
Canon Law should also apply in France to the bishops and cardinals there and those at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican if they cannot clarify that they affirm the baptism of desire as being invisible and not visible.It never was and nor is an exception to the interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This was how outside the Church there is no salvation was taught by the Holy Spirit and the magisterium in past centuries.
LAITY MUST REFUSE TO ACCEPT HERESY
5.The laity must clarify that 'they do not affirm Vatican Council II with Cushingism, in which the baptism of desire is always visible and so it becomes an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is heresy.Yet this is the heretical doctrine being taught in the dioceses of France, like in Italy.
Canon Law must be applied against the SSPX and the liberal Carcassonne Bishop if the ecclesiastics cannot formally reject the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism and clarify this issue for their lay congregations and diocesan religious.
SSPX THEOLOGICALLY IN HARMONY WITH LIBERAL FRENCH BISHOP
6.The laity must inform the SSPX and the liberal Novus Ordo Bishop in France, that if they cannot affirm these teachings of the Catholic Church then could they confirm it? Could they also confirm that they have been teaching doctrinal heresy all these years supported by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the two popes and so they do not expect the laity to continue with these errors.
POPE BENEDICT MADE AN OBJECTIVE MISTAKE IN MARCH 2016
7.The laity must be aware that Pope Benedict XVI made an objective error in March 2016 in the interview with Avvenire. They must ask Pope Benedict XVI to interpret the Catechism and Vatican Council II with Feeneyism, even if the Jewish Left and the Masons do not like it.They must ask the two popes to switch to rational and traditional Feeneyism( invisible cases are not visible in 2017, so there are no visible exceptions to traditional EENS as it was known to the 16th century missionaries).
__________________________________
Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.
Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.
_______________________________________________________
POPE BENEDICT MUST BE SHOWN HIS MISTAKE
Pope Benedict needs to be shown that he made a mistake in March 2016, when in the daily Avvenire , he said extra ecclesiam nulla salus was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.Since there was a development with Vatican Council II ( Vatican Council II Cushingite of course).
NO DEVELOPMENT OF EENS WITH THEOLOGY OF FEENEYISM
NO DEVELOPMENT OF EENS WITH THEOLOGY OF FEENEYISM
With Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite) there is no development of the dogma EENS as it was known in the 16th century.
With the Catechism and Vatican Council II being Feeneyite there is no Anonymous Christian who is saved outside the Catholic Church.
LAITY MUST REFUSE TO INTERPRET THE CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH WITH CUSHINGISM
8.So the laity must ask the diocese to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism.They must assure the bishops that they will refuse to interpret the Catechism with irrational and nonsense Cushingism.
SCHOOL CHILDREN IN RELIGION AND CATECHISM CLASS MUST BE INFORMED ABOUT A CHOICE
9.Catholic school children in religion/catechism classes must be told that the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Cushingism( as is being done now) or Feeneyism and the conclusion would be different.
They must tell the Bishop in Carcassonne that they will not allow their school children to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Cushingism.
A LIE IN PUBLIC AFTER BEING INFORMED
10.Bishop Alain Planet and Bishop Bernard Fellay must be asked as Catholics not to lie.If they cannot affirm Catholic doctrines interpreted with rationality then their present status is a deception. It is a lie.It is a deception and a falsehood to support the theology of Cushingism after being informed.
Bishop Fellay recently said that he was aware that the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation has been changed surreptitiously.3 However he still does not seem aware of the difference between the theology of Feeneyism and Cushingism.4
-Lionel Andrades
1
The un-demonization of the SSPX: Exemplary decision by Bishop Planet
http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2017/04/the-un-demonization-of-sspx-exemplary.html
NeoSSPX Watch: Bishop Planet, "The Masons Are Men of Good Will"
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.it/2017/05/neosspx-watch-bishop-planet-masons-are.html
2.
April 29, 2017
3.
April 27, 2017
4.
April 28, 2017
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/bishop-fellay-does-not-realize-that-he.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment