BLOGS | MAY. 1, 2017
Benedict XVI Warns of ‘Dangerous Situation’ With Radical Atheism and Radical Islam
In a new message addressed to a conference sponsored by Poland’s president, Benedict warns this contrast ‘creates a dangerous situation for our age.’
Pope Emeritus Benedict discussed the joint perils posed by radical Islam and radical atheistic secularism in a message he sent to a conference held April 19 in Warsaw, Poland, on the topic of his thinking about the concept of the state, held to coincide with his 90th birthday.
Lionel: All he had to offer in the face of Muslim movements and atheist forces is secular values approved by the Jewish Left.Pope Benedict did not have a Catholic identity to face these movements.
At Regensburg, Pope Benedict did not affirm Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Feeneyism. He would then have been saying all Muslims need to formally convert into the Church with 'faith and baptism'(Ad Gentes 7).
The Rahner-Ratzinger new theology created a rupture with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church.Upon the old ecclesiocentrism was based the non separation of Church and State.
Benedict’s comments were delivered to the conference by Archbishop Salvatore Pennacchio, papal nuncio to Poland.
Here is the text of the pope emeritus’ comments, which were made in Polish and translated for the Register:
I was greatly moved, grateful and happy to learn that an academic conference on the topic of “The Concept of the State From the Perspective of the Teachings of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger/Pope Benedict XVI” (Pojęcie Państwa w perspektywie nauczania Kardynała Józefa Ratzingera/Benedykta XVI), attended by the representatives of Poland’s government and Church and organized under the patronage of the president of the Republic of Poland, was held to coincide with my 90th birthday.
Lionel: How can there be concepts of the State from the perspective of Cardinal Ratzinger/Pope Benedict when he rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) upon which was based the old ecclesiology.Upon the past ecclesiology was based the need for all non Catholics to convert into the Church as members,an ecumenism of return,the non-separation of Church and State and the the need to proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.
The topic of the conference brings government and Church officials into common dialogue on a topic that is of key significance to the future of our [European] continent.
Lionel: The Catholic Church in Poland also uses the new theology of Pope Benedict, Cushingism theology.So they affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Cushingite), Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) and the Catechisms ( Cushingite).If they interpreted these magisterial documents with Feeneyism then there would be no salvation outside the Church and so there would be no change with the ecclesiology of the past.
The Rahner-Ratzinger new theology now has created a rupture with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church.Upon the old ecclesiocentrism was based the non separation of Church and State.The old exclusivist ecclesiology was the foundation for all political legislation being based on the Social Kingship of Christ over all political legislation.It was based on the old doctrines interpreted with the old Feeneyite theology that there was the need for the separation of secularism and state, since it leads to Satanism.
The contrast between the concepts of the radically atheistic state and the creation of the radically theocratic state by Muslim movements creates a dangerous situation for our age, one whose effects we experience each day.
Lionel: At Regensburg, Pope Benedict did not affirm Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Feeneyism. He would then have been saying all Muslims need to formally convert into the Church with 'faith and baptism'(Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II) and there are no known exceptions.Instead he affirmed Nostra Aetate with Cushingism even though there is nothing in Nostra Aetate to contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite).
During his pontificate, inter-religious dialogue was conducted based on there being known salvation outside the Church. This is irrational and an innovation.It is deception yet it was magisterial for him.
So all he has to offer Muslim movements and atheist forces is secular values approved by the Jewish Left.Pope Benedict did not have a Catholic identity to face these movements.
These radical ideologies require us to urgently develop a convincing concept of the state that will stand up to the confrontation between these challenges and help to overcome it.
Lionel: By 'convincing concepts of the state' he means secular concepts in which magisterial documents will be interpreted as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) and the old ecclesiology.So there is no basis for a Catholic theocratic state.
This is what he seems to have worked for throughout his life.So there is no theological support for the non separation of Church and State and the necessity of the Social Reign of Christ the King.
With there being known salvation outside the Church for him why would non Catholics need to enter the Church? This would be his reasoning.There could be the Anonymous Christian. This is expressed in the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846 and the theological papers of the International Theological Commission(ITC) which he had overseen.
There could also be a theology of religions for him. This he mentions in the syncretistic paper of the ITC,
Christianity and the World Religions.It was based on a vague Christology without the need of non Catholics having to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation.
Since there is known salvation outside the Church for him and the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation,has been made superflous, there is no theolgical foundation for a Catholic political party.In the past it was based on the old ecclesiocentrism of the Church. There is no theological necessity for the non separation of Church and State. Working for 'the common good' would be enough and this would mean accepting pro-Satanic values in a secular political system.For Pope Benedict it is not necessary for Christians and non Catholics to convert into the Church as members.Outside the Church there is no salvation is now only an 'aphorism'(CCC 846) for him.The faith has been changed by him with an irrational premise that creates a new theology with which he interprets magisterial documents. So there are new doctrines created with his interpretation of Vatican Council II.His Cushingite interpretation of Vatican Council II is different from mine( Feeneyite).
So we both have Vatican Council II before us and he produces a rupture with Tradition while for me there is a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors.
The invitation of the Polish group to Pope Benedict on this particular subject it seems was based on ignorance.
During the agony of the previous half-century, Poland gave the world two great figures — Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński and Pope St. John Paul II — who not only reflected upon these issues, but also carried within themselves suffering and vivid experiences; thus they continue to give us guidelines for the future.
I give my blessing to all of you and would like to express my sincere gratitude for the work that you do in these circumstances.
Vatican, April 15, 2017