Friday, May 19, 2017

Bishop Robert Morlino, Fr.John Zuhlsdorf, Catholics in general still interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational theology : not the work of the Holy Spirit


Formation of a new “Latin Mass Society of Central NJ”

 Catholics are still interpreting Vatican Council II with the irrational theology. This cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit

Traditionalists/Conservative Catholics are still interpreting Vatican Council II with the irrational theology. This cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.Bishop Morlino, Fr.John Zuhlsdorf use an irrational premise to stay politically correct on Vatican Council and act as if this is is normal and all right.They do not respond when this is brought to their attention.
Since this is what the two popes and the Jewish Left demand, Catholics are choosing evil,irrationality and heresy to protect their personal interests.Even though Cushingism produces a heretical conclusion they will not interpret Vatican Council II with rational Feeneyism.
If Catholics interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism they will be threathened. Priests will lose their incardination and professors  will lose their mandatum to teach theology.So the bishops, acting for the Masons, who represent Satan,even control the theology of the Tridentine Rite Mass.
Fr.John Zuhlsdorf on his blog has announced a new Latin Mass Society in Madison, USA whose theology is not that of the Holy Spirit 1 .

 Dedicated to spreading and supporting the Extraordinary Form in the Diocese of Madison
Bishop Robert Morlino at Madison has not denied many reports. He uses Cushingite theology to interpret Vatican Council II, Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995), the Nicene Creed, extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Dominus Iesus etc.He is politically correct with the Left and Satan. 
(continued below)

April 26, 2017

 April 25, 2017

Bishop Robert C.Morlino needs to interpret the Catechism with Feeneyism then the laity can do the same in study groups

February 19, 2015

For Bishop Robert C. Morlino, Louie Verrecchio and Robert Sungenis the Church's teaching on marriage, the family and salvation has changed

February 18, 2015
Bishop Robert C. Morlino says doctrines cannot be changed yet on salvation he has accepted a change in doctrine and practise


  (continued from above)
With Cushingite theology at Madison they interpret magisterial documents.This is approved by the ADL, USCCB and popes Francis and Benedict.So according to their New Theology there are exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II ( LG 16 etc) to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This is false theology. There are no practical exceptions to the dogma EENS says Chis Ferrara.How can zero cases of something be exceptions to EENS asks John Martignoni ? To say that people who do not exist in our reality are exceptions to EENS cannot be the teaching of the Holy Spirit.
If a pope contradicts the Principle of Non Contradiction it still is a contradiction.How can invisible cases of the baptism of desire who are now in Heaven be visible exceptions to the dogma EENS on earth ?
The same error is being made in Poland, a Catholic country where there is a split between Church and State,since the theology is Cushingite.The new theology is pro-Satan.
If they reverse the theology, choose Feeneyism instead of Cushingism, automatically, without choosing a new theology, they are back to the old ecclesiology of the Church on outside the Church there is no salvation.The diamond was there always.Only the dirt, encrustments, prisms and dull glass covered it.It produced something new.When it is cleared we are back to view of the old diamond.
Traditionalist/Conservative Catholics have still not denied that they use a false theology and new doctrines created by this false theology, to change Church teaching on salvation,faith, mission, ecclesiology, ecumenism etc.
If we acknowledge that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and the Council Fathers at Vatican Council II made a mistake, in accepting the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, it is easier to see the same philosphical error of Boston- 1949  all over Vatican Council II.It  is repeated in the text.
If we can admit that invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, are not visible exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),as they had wrongly assumed in 1949, then Vatican Council II changes before our very eyes.It is the same Vatican Council II text but the premises and the conclusions are different.
Traditionalists/Conservative Catholics would realize that all these years they made a doctrinal mistake in Vatican Council II, since their new  philosophy and new theology,has its foundation in irrationality.For political reasons Church doctrine was changed in 1949 and then in 1965 and this was accepted by the popes, cardinals and most Catholics.
But this can all be changed now.
We simply have to look at Vatican Council II in a different way.If we assume that there are good things and wrong things, texts which support EENS and others which contradict EENS, we are still using Cushingite theology.It is still the same Cushingite way of interpreting Vatican Council II.If we assume that Vatican Council II affirms the 'rigorist interpretation' of EENS and there are no exceptions to EENS mentioned  in Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) since invisible and hypothetical cases are just that,invisible, then we are correctly reading the text of Vatican Council II without the irrational premise.We infer correctly that invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance(LG 16) do not exist visibly in our reality.-Lionel Andrades  


April 24, 2017


May 2, 2017

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf contradicts the Athanasius Creed with visible for us baptism of desire .For Pope Benedict too there is a development with Vatican Council II



February 11, 2017
Image result for Photo of Fr.John Zuhlsdorf

Sacriligous communion : Fr. John Zuhlsdorf could do his part and affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

May 1, 2017

Pope Benedict's magisterial heresy is 'a guide for the perplexed' for Tracey Rowland


 AUGUST 27, 2016

Dean of Theology at St. Anselm contradicts liberal Fr. John Zuhlsdorf

AUGUST 26, 2016
Canon Law could apply to Fr.John Zuhlsdorf in Norcia : promotes a falsehood

 AUGUST 26, 2016

I am avoiding the New Theology which assumes hypothetical cases are personally known in the present or past times, in particular, the hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance


If the SSPX is unilaterally accepted by the Vatican it still means that the SSPX is condoning a heretical and non traditional interpretation of Vatican Council II, as is being done by Fr. Z

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf's heresy

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf repeats Marchetti's error on the baptism of blood

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II with Marchetti's theory so the Council for him is ambigous and a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus

Fr.Z approves of adultery in inter faith marriages

February 3, 2015 
Rorate Caeili and Fr.Zuhlsdorf's interpretations are politically correct

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf's understanding of the Church is Christocentric. It is the same as the liberals.He has no concept of a Church with an exclusivist ecclesiology. He has been religiously formed with the New Theology of Rahner and Ratzinger


So when Cardinal Burke and Fr. Z say there is no doctrinal change in Vatican Council II ( interpreted with exceptions) or in AL ( with known exceptions) are they really protecting themself ?

What if Cardinal Burke and Fr. Zuhlsdorf said that there are no known exceptions to Catholic moral and salvation theology ?.Would they lose their religious faculties in Rome?

April 21, 2016

September 21, 2016


September 26, 2016

Pope John Paul II, Hans Urs von Balthasar with the new theology used an irrational premise.It was contrary to the Principle of Non Contradiction. Fr. Zuhlsdorf also interprets Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus with this irrationality


Don't evangelise like Fr.John Zuhlsdorf : he interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf is in material heresy


Related imageRelated imageRelated image

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf does not believe in the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : advice on interfaith marriages

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf made an objective mistake : irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II with Marchetti's theory so the Council for him is ambigous and a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus - 2

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf interprets Vatican Council II with Marchetti's theory so the Council for him is ambigous and a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus - 3


Parish priests will not allow the Catechism to be interpreted with the theology of Feeneyism. They could be suspended or transferred.

APRIL 24, 2017

Until Fr.Zuhlsdorf or a bishop affirms the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism lay Catholics have to affirm the Faith independently and with the opposition of the local Cushingite bishop


APRIL 30, 2017

Conference speakers and others can still now, ' one year after Amoris Laetitia' , 'seek clarity' on the heretical statement of Pope Benedict last March 2016.

Pope Benedict XVI during his liturgy contradicts the Oath Against Modernism

Pope Benedict XVI could have interpreted Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in March 2016 with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism: he chose heresy and the hermeneutic of rupture
 February 11, 2017

Now we are left with Bishops Faure, Aquinas and Williamson.Can they say what is un-sayable?


No comments: