All the Cushingites believe in "subsistence" ecclesiology.What are Cushingites?
+Richard Cushing was the Archbishop of Boston during the controversy of the Saint Benedict Center. Here is some information about him: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Cushing
Cushing by the 1960's was an ecumenist who openly prayed with Protestants. Some on this forum who deny Catholic teaching on Baptism of Desire and Baptism of Blood use the term "Cushingite" to describe those of us who defend the Catholic teaching.
Those of us who defend the Catholic teaching are not supporters of Cusihing or his ecumenical ideas, and we also know that Cushing is a sideshow, as it was was Cushing, but the Holy Office in a letter approved by Pope Pius XII that corrected the doctrinal error of the Feeneyites.
They have been corrected about the fact that using this term to describe us is a dishonest tactic, but continue to so. Let the readers who can see this clearly decide.
Cushinghites are people that
share the modernist error of liberal Richard Cushing.
Cushinguites say that there can be known souls saved in invincible ignorance or
baptism of desire, contradicting the ex cathedra thrice defined Extra Ecclesiam
Nulla Salus dogma that says that only Catholics go to Heaven.
By saying that everyone need not enter the Catholic Church for salvation
because there are some that can be saved in false religions, (a Jew can be
saved as a Jew, a Muslim as a Muslim, a Hindu as a Hindu, without
converting explicitly to Catholicism) the Cushinguites throw out the
window Cantate Domino, Florence, Trent, and even Vatican
Council II (Ad Gentes 7)!.
Cushinguites say that there can be known souls saved in invincible ignorance or
baptism of desire, contradicting the ex cathedra thrice defined Extra Ecclesiam
Nulla Salus dogma that says that only Catholics go to Heaven.
By saying that everyone need not enter the Catholic Church for salvation
because there are some that can be saved in false religions, (a Jew can be
saved as a Jew, a Muslim as a Muslim, a Hindu as a Hindu, without
converting explicitly to Catholicism) the Cushinguites throw out the
window Cantate Domino, Florence, Trent, and even Vatican
Council II (Ad Gentes 7)!.
_______________
« Reply #4 on: August 23,
2014, 11:23:39 PM »
2014, 11:23:39 PM »
0
That is irrelevant.
Cushingism is the name of the error
that is professed by everyone
that believes there are known exceptions
to Extra Ecclesiam Nulla
Salus (this is, that there are known souls that
are saved via implicit
desire without even an explicit belief in the Christian truths). They
assume this is a reality, a known exception, as we could ever see
the dead, forgetting that God Himself has revealed only ONE
BAPTISM. There is only one baptism and that of water that we
desire without even an explicit belief in the Christian truths). They
assume this is a reality, a known exception, as we could ever see
the dead, forgetting that God Himself has revealed only ONE
BAPTISM. There is only one baptism and that of water that we
humans know of.
The conciliar Popes have all been cushinguites.
If a person
believes that non - Catholics can be saved, then that person
has succumbed to the Cushingite error which contradicts
EENS, was carried over to Vatican II Council,
believes that non - Catholics can be saved, then that person
has succumbed to the Cushingite error which contradicts
EENS, was carried over to Vatican II Council,
and has not been corrected yet.
Cushingism
leads to the error of believing that BOD and
invincible ignorance are actually de fide, instead of
hypothetical, and it degenerates without fail in
invincible ignorance are actually de fide, instead of
hypothetical, and it degenerates without fail in
universalism and indifferentism, which ends up
in the Prayer at Assisi.
in the Prayer at Assisi.
That is what is meant by the general adjective of
"cushingite".
"cushingite".
________________________________
- Hero Member
-
- Posts: 5757
- Reputation: +3509/-188
- Gender:
-
0
Quote from: Ambrose
Quote from: CantarellaCushinghites are people that share the modernist error
of liberal Richard Cushing. Cushinguites say that there
can be known souls saved in invincible ignorance or
baptism of desire, contradicting the ex cathedra
thrice defined Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus dogma
that says that only Catholics go to Heaven.
By saying that everyone need not enter the
Catholic Church for salvation because there
are some that can be saved in false religions,
(a Jew can be saved as a Jew, a Muslim as a Muslim,
a Hindu as a Hindu, without converting explicitly to
Catholicism) the Cushinguites throw out the window
Cantate Domino, Florence, Trent, and even
Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7)!.
_________________________________
Ambrose:
Cantarella
- Hero Member
- Posts: 5757
- Reputation: +3509/-188
- Gender:
By saying that everyone need not enter the Catholic Church for salvation because there are some that can be saved in false religions, (a Jew can be saved as a Jew, a Muslim as a Muslim, a Hindu as a Hindu, without converting explicitly to Catholicism) the Cushinguites throw out the window Cantate Domino, Florence, Trent, and even Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7)!.
That's not what the Holy Office taught.
The letter of 1949 claims that there are known exceptions
to the EENS dogma which has been defined by three
Church Councils. The known exceptions are supposed
to be the souls who die "invincible ignorant" of the True
Faith and are saved through subjective and ambiguous
"implicit desire via last minute BOD".
This letter is also a straighforward and blant rejection
of the Nicene Creed "I believe in one baptism for the
forgiveness of sin" which refers to water Baptism only,
the sacrament that has been revealed by God Himself.
It is being implied in this letter that there are three or
more known baptisms:water, desire, blood etc.
Unfortunately, Vatican II curia - Novus Ordo,
sedevacantists such as CMRI, and even SSPX
priests such as Fr.Francois Laisney are guilty of
the same faulty reasoning.
As said before, it seems that that the "traditionalists"
can only point out to the errors in Vatican II but
cannot really provide an alternative since they act
unaware of the Cushing Heresy (invincible ignorance
-> denial of EENS) which is the cause of those
errors.
The EENS dogma (as all Catholic dogmas) is to
be understood as solemnly declared, professed,
and taught since the creation of the
Church, without any change of meaning.
Quote
Pope Pius IX, Vatican Council, Session 3,Chapter 4, #14,ex cathedra: "Hence, too, that
meaning of the sacred dogmas is ever to be
maintained which has once been declared by
Holy Mother Church, and there must never be
any abandonment of this sense under the pretext
or in the name of a more profound
understanding."
Quote
Pope Pius IX, Vatican Council, Session
3, Canon 4, ex cathedra:
"If anyone says that it is possible that at
some time, given theadvancement of
knowledge, a sense may be assigned to the
dogmas propounded by the church which
is different from that which the church has
understood and understands: let him be anathema."
Cushinguism is an actual ERROR based on the modernist
new doctrine of salvation made in the USA. The
Archbishop of Boston and the liberal Jesuits there
gave us the novel concept of an exceptional way of
salvation: through "invincible ignorance" while in "false
religion". This objective error was spread in the Catholic
Church and carried over Vatican II. It is the main basis
for liberalism and dissent in the Church.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment