Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate Fr.Stefano Manelli's interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS was Cushingite : Lanzetta and Mattei also were irrational

The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate must realize that Fr.Serafino Lanzetta and Prof. Roberto dei Mattei a few years  back at conferences which they addressed   interpreted Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism.They did not know of a choice.Mattei wrote books on Vatican Council II not knowing about Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).

Neither did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, tell them about Vatican Council II, as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.Even today Cardinal Muller and Cardinal Braz de Avez is hiding this truth from the Sisters.
So the Sisters must  affirm Vatican Council II (F) and reject Vatican Council II ( C)  and then ask he cardinals to do the same.

Please note that the two founders of the Franciscans of the Immaculate were also interpreting Vatican Council II with Cushingism. This was a break with Tradition.They did not know that they had a choice.

So they rejected Vatican Council II and believed that the only way to hold on to Tradition was the Tridentine Rite Mass.

Fr.Stefano Manelli F.I the founder of the Franciscans of the Immaculate had approved a book in English written by the late Fr. William Most. It was translated into Italian and distributed at Franciscan chapels.Fr.William Most, a good apologist, however like Fr. Manelli, had accepted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.It assumes invisible cases of the baptism of desire and blood, without the baptism of water, were exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So for them there were exceptions to the old ecclesiology of the Church,since they were all using Cushingism as a theology and were not aware of it.

Now there is an option for the Franciscans of the Immaculate and they do not have to follow the understanding of this issue as was known to Mattei, Lanzetta and the two founders of the community.

At the same time they must not accept Vatican Council II according to Cardinal Muller and the two popes.If they do so, it would mean they do not know what exactly causes the rupture with the past ecclesiology.

We now have found the missing link.

Sisters explain this to Fr. Stefano Manelli. Ask him to affirm Vatican Council II , Feeneyite and EENS ( Feeneyite).In this way there can only be an ecumenism of return , non Catholics would be outside the Church, all liturgical rites  would have a common ecclesiology which would be the past ecclesiology and there would be unity in doctrine once again , with the Church Fathers, the saints and founders of the religious communities  who lived before 1930. There would be unity with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. Now with Cushingism there is a rupture with the Syllabus on ecumenism etc.

So ask Fr. Manelli to affirm Vatican Council II and be specific as to which one he chooses.Since now we know what exactly causes the hermeneutic of rupture or continuity with the past.It is the use or avoiding of the invisible premise ( invisible people are visible) and the resulting conclusion ( visible invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance(LG 16), seeds of the Word (AG 11),imperfect communion with the Church(UR 3), elements of sanctification and truth in other religions (LG 8) etc, are exceptions to Feeneyite EENS).

Please tell Fr.Manelli that even Ludwig Ott, in  Fundamentals of Catholic  Dogma has made this mistake.He was not aware  of the Cushingite error.-Lionel Andrades

Fr.William Most and Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton assumed that there were exceptions to the dogma. So they were wrong at the onset.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/01/frwilliam-most-and-mons-joseph-clifford.html