Thursday, May 25, 2017

Fr.Stefano Manelli and the Franciscans of the Immaculate have to correct their Vatican Council II theology

Image result for Photos of Fr.Stefano Manelli F.I
Fr.Stefano Manelli F.I like Cardinal Braz de Avez interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism and so the Council is a rupture with the past ecclesiology, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the Syllabus of Errors.It's a rupture with St.Robert Bellarmine, St. Francis Xavier and St. Ignatius of Loyola on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
This is the Cushingite interpretation of Vatican Council II which the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate have to affirm, teach and live to be recognised by the Vatican.
 Franciscans of the Immaculate offer/attend Holy Mass with a new ecclesiology.Theologically they reject the Tradition.They reject the past ecclesiology which was ecclesiocentric, and was associated with the Mass of the past, in Latin or Greek.
If Fr.Manelli and his religious community would interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism, there would not be a rupture with EENS or the Syllabus of Errors, but there would be tension with the two popes, the Vatican Curia and the secular,political Left forces.They would oppose it. They would oppose Vatican Council II interpreted with Feeneyism.
So the real issue is not Vatican Council II .The real issue for the present magisterium of the two popes, is to reject the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.This would be going back to the past ecclesiology and the Masons do not want this.This is not acceptable to the Jewish Left and the liberal rabbbis who represent Israel.Even liberals in other religions would oppose it.So presently Fr.Stefano Manelli and the Franciscans of the Immaculate please the Left and ecclesiastical Masonry, when they interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism and as a rupture with Tradition.
They interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational premise to create a non traditional and heretical conclusion and this pleases the two liberal and Left-accomodating popes.If they had interpreted the Council without the irrational premise then the Council would not be a rupture with the past ecclesiology of St.Francis Xavier, St.Anthony Marie Claret,St.Teresa of Avila.Then Vatican Council II would encourage Mission knowing that the majority of people one earth are on the way to hell, since they die without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7, LG 14).This would encourage Catholics to go out into the whole world and preach the Gospel like St. Francis Xavier and the missionaries of the past ecclesiology. This interpretation of Vatican Council II may not result in a canonical status or a personal prelature and instead there could be demands for suspension and exclusion from the Church.

The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate are being allowed to come into the Church but they would have to give up traditional mission and the exclusivist ecclesiology by assuming invisible and hypothetical cases, mentioned in Vatican Council II (LG 16, LG 8,UR 3 etc) are visible and personally known people in 2017, who have been saved outside the Church.So since these invisible exceptions exist in the reality of the popes, the dogma EENS has been made superflous.This is the Vatican Council II which Fr.Manelli and the Franciscan Friars of the Immmaculate, already know and profess, when they offer the Traditional Latin Mass.This Vatican Council II is not a problem when it is the new theology with the old Mass for Pope Francis.It is a rupture with EENS and so is not triumphalistic.
Now to be coherent, traditional and non heretical, Fr.Manelli and the many Franciscans of the Immaculate priests , who offer only the Tridentine Rite Mass,have simply to announce that Vatican Council II is no more an issue for them.They affirm the Council without the irrationality in philosophy and theology supported by Rahner and Ratzinger.
They will not interpret Vatican Council II, they could announce, in line with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.They will affirm Vatican Council II as did the magisterium and missionaries in the 16th century- without the irrational premise.

So they do not reject Vatican Council II but reject the irrational premise used in the interpretation.
They could then call upon Cardinl Braz de Avez, the Synod of cardinals and the two popes to also accept a Vatican Council II which has a continuity with the told de fide teaching on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.The Church is the new people of God (Nostra Aetate 4) and outside of which no one is saved (AG 7, LG 14), no one is saved without faith and baptism.
The Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate priests,need to clarify that in March 2016 Pope Benedict XVI made a mistake when he interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism, which was a rupture with the dogma EENS, as it was interpreted by the missionaries in the 16th century.In 2016 the pope could have interpreted Vatican Council II without the politically correct false premise, and then there would have been 'no development of the dogma' with Vatican Council II(Feeneyite). It is time now for the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the SSPX to put Vatican Council II aside, as an issue.Get your theology and philosophy in order. -Lionel Andrades

No comments: