No canonical status for the SSPX this year.Reconciliation talks have failed.Doctrine divides for a corrupt magisterium

No canonical status for the SSPX this year.The reconciliation talks have failed. They can no more come into the Church without accepting a Vatican Council II which is a rupture with Tradition.Doctrine divides for a corrupt magisterium and the SSPX can no more be faithful Catholics to get a personal prelature, since it would be 'triumphalistic'.Being faithful Catholics would be triumphalistic  for Pope Francis and the Conference of Bishops throughout the world.The conferences are a magisterium in rebellion. They are examples of collegiality based on false doctrine.

The Bishops Conferences want the SSPX to compromise on doctrine and not interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism i.e  without the false premise and conclusion.So re-union with Rome is now not imminent as it was reported a few months back.

Pope Francis wants the SSPX and the Franciscans of the Immaculate to come into the Church rejecting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Pope Benedict clarified it in March 2016. So the SSPX cannot accept EENS like the missionaries in the 16th century since Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) i.e invisible cases are visible exceptions to EENS, this is the official line, they call this nonsense ' a development of the dogma'.

Feeneyite EENS is prohibited.The SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012 which doctrinally affirmed Feeneyite EENS was rejected by the  liberal and corrupt magisterium at the Vatican.The corruption is being implemented throughout the Catholic Church.Even the Polish Bishops Conference in Catholic Poland is following the poltically correct heresy.
VORIS ALSO ACCEPTS FALSE DOCTRINE

Even Michael Voris at Church Militant TV has accepted the false doctrine and so is not excommunicated or declared 'not a Catholic', by the Archbishop of Detroit,USA.Michael has said that every one does not need to be a card carrying member of the Church for salvation.That got him off the hook.He means being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are known exceptions to the dogma EENS, even though these cases do not exist in our reality for them to be exceptions.Simon Rafe also accepts this politically correct position of the Left.This is being politically correct with Satan and the Masons, who allow CMTV to operate normally and call them self Catholics.
CMTV DOES NOT SAY POPE FRANCIS IS INDIFFERENT OR HERETICAL

Michael Voris can criticize the alleged indifferentism at Medugorje but not the indifferentism and heresy of Pope Francis, when he returned from Fatima recently, and called the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS, 'triumphalism'.CMTV is not triumphalistic.They have gone out of their way to show this to everyone who matters.They do not affirm Feeneyite EENS theologically.They do not affirm the three Councils which defined the dogma EENS without mentioning any invisible case being a visible exception to John 3:5 and Mark 16:16.

The SSPX now is not to be given a personal prelature unless they reject the dogma EENS like the two popes and all the Conferences of Catholic Bishops.

They have to accept the Cushingite theology of Vatican Council II and not interpret the Council with Feeneyite philosophy i.e invisible people cannot be exceptions to EENS, a baptism of desire case cannot exist in our reality, it is not personally known and physically seen  in 2017 for example, for it to be relevant or an exception to EENS.So there are no exceptions to EENS as it was interpreted by the 16th century missionaries.The SSPX has to affirm the opposite even though it is irrational and fantasy theology.

They have to announce that St.Ignatius of Loyola and St. Francis of Assisi were triumphalistic.Since they did not interpret EENS with the irrational premise.

Now the SSPX has to compromise on doctrine like the FSSP priests and CMTV to have their situation regularised.

Even the traditionalists Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary(MICM) , the communities of Fr. Leonard Feeney,have compromised.They do intepret EENS triumphalisticaly (and God bless them for this) but they interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism, 'without triumphalism'.They assume LG 16, LG 98 UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 11 etc refer to visible cases in 2017.Vatican Council II( Cushingite) becomes a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).They criticize Vatican Council II. They criticize Vatican Council II in general without specifying if they refer to Vatican Council II Feeneyite or Cushingite.

Sounds complicated?

 The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, the St.Benedict Centers in the USA, affirm EENS in line with the missionaries of the 16th century, the magisterium of that time and that of the centuries past.But this is not how Pope Benedict and Pope Francis interprets EENS.The popes are Cushingite on EENS and so reject the past ecclesiology which had its foundation on EENS. The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary are Feeneyite on EENS and so would not reject the past ecclesiology on an ecumenism of return and there being no salvation for Christians and non Christians, unless they enter and remain in the Church as members.This was being a traditionalist.This was the ecclesiology of the Tridentine Rite Mass.Unfortunately, they also interpret Vatican Council II like Pope Benedict and Pope Francis and consider it a rupture with the 16th century interpretation of EENS.They are all Cushingites on Vatican Council II.They are Cushingites on Vatican Council II and Feeneyites on EENS. The two popes are Cushingites on Vatican Council II and EENS.

Even the SSPX interprets Vatican Council II like the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary: with Cushingite theology.But unlike the MICM at the St. Benedict Centers they reject Vatican Council II completely.The MICM vaguely and confusedly accept Vatican Council II and so are recognised in the diocese of Manchester and Worcester,USA .They are not opposed by the Catholic Bishops Conference in Boston which will oppose the SSPX.

The Jewish Left is not allowing the MICM and the SSPX to hold a conference to discuss this issue.They would be considered Anti-Semitic and it would expose the treachery of the ecclesiastical Masonry within the Church.The MICM community of Fr. Leonard Feeney in Worcester,USA has full canonical status unlike the SSPX.They are traditionalists who in public accept Vatican Council II theologically, even though it is a rupture with Tradition.Privately they may express  reservations.In public they are not triumphalistic on Vatican Council II. Unlike me they do not say that Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) is in perfect harmony with the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS.-Lionel Andrades