Thursday, May 11, 2017

Robert Spencer and Michael Voris can quote me.I am ready to affirm Vatican Council II( Feeneyite).It is the official teaching of the Catholic Church

Image result for Photo of Robert Spencer with Michael Voris CHURCH MILITANT TV
Robert Spencer tells Church Militant TV that we must speak the truth of the faith, then, why does he not tell the U.S bishops that Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)  as it was known to the 16th century missionaries and as the Council in Ad Gentes 7 says, all need faith and baptism for salvation?
TELL THE BISHOPS THAT VATICAN COUNCIL II SAYS NON CATHOLICS ARE ORIENTED TO HELL
Tell bishops McManus, Soto and others  that the Council indicates all Muslims are oriented to the fires of Hell in 2017 and there are no known  or knowable exceptions.

So there is no rupture in the pre and post Vatican Council II understanding of Islamism and its being a false path to salvation.
Robert Spencer could announce that as a Catholic he interprets Vatican Council II with invisible for us in 2017 people LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 11 etc, not being visible exceptions  to all needing to be members of the Catholic Church to avoid the fires of Hell ( Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441).So why do Robert Spencer and Michael Voris not affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church according to magisterial documents interpreted with a rational philosophy(invisible cases are simply invisible) and ask the U.S bishops to do the same?Here  the issue is Catholic doctrine and rational theology and not political correctness with the Left.
Image result for Photos false church
FALSE CHURCH INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II ASSUMING INVISIBLE PEOPLE ARE VISIBLE
It is 'the false church', 'the church of Nice', the Zionist church within the Catholic Church that interprets Vatican Council II assuming invisible people are visible and personally known.Then they conclude that these  'visible people', those with the baptism of desire or being saved in invincible ignorance, are concrete exceptions to the interpretation of the dogma EENS according to Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.
Since there is nothing in Nostra Aetate to contradict 'the rigorist interpretation' of the dogma EENS, there is no change in the Church's understanding of Islam, as understood by St.John Bosco and St.Thomas Aquinas.Outside the Church there is no salvation is post Vatican Council II Church teaching, which may not be popular or accepted by many.
Catholics who marry Muslims are living in adultery and in mortal sin even though the bishops McManus, Soto.... may not believe in the dogma EENS or interpret Vatican Council II in line with EENS.
Image result for Photo of Robert Spencer with Michael Voris CHURCH MILITANT TV
So what's stopping Robert Spencer and Michael Voris from going ahead and affirming Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) instead of the usual Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) of the U.S bishops? I don't think that either of the two are personally afraid .Are they protecting other interests?
Michael Voris does not want to offend the Jewish Left on this issue.He no more says Jews need to convert for salvation.So he will not affirm Vatican Council II, Feeneyite.Christine Niles in a Mic'd Up  program she hosted for CMTV cited a text from Cantate Dominio verbatim, but left out the word 'Jews'.
The Archbishop of Detroit asked Michael Voris to change the name of his media and  not use the word 'Catholic' after Michael produced an excellent video (which is no more available for the public) on the Church being the continuation of the Jewish religion, they now have the Jewish Messiah.So Voris is being threathened and controlled legally by the Jewish Left. He is not going to affirm Vatican Council II(Feeneyite).
Robert Spencer is critical of the Jewish Left which has allied with anti-Christ Islamism and things Satanic( homosexuality,abortion, vending machines which sell contraceptves outside pharmacies...).However his sponsor is a Jewish organisation.Can he say that the Catholic Church teaches in its magisterial documents (and not the magisterium of persons at the Vatican) that all Jews and Muslims need to formally convert into the Catholic Church to go to Heaven and avoid the fires of Hell? Will he be hit with the anti-Semitism laws of the Jewish Left? Will this be a threat to his work at Jihad Watch.com? It could also be a threat to his security and protection and that of his family? So he does not affirm Vatican Council II( Feeneyite).He does not speak the truth to the U.S bishops on Islamism and Vatican Council II.He does not even quote me.
He can quote me.
Jihad Watch can quote me.I am ready to affirm Vatican Council II( Feeneyite).
CMTV can quote me. I will not deny the Faith on this issue.
VATICAN COUNCIL II (FEENEYITE) IS THE TRADITIONAL INTERPRETATION OF THE COUNCIL
The point I am trying to make here is that Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is the traditional interpretation of the Council with a rational theology and so it is magisterial in this sense.The conclusion is traditional doctrines on salvation, ecclesiology, mission, ecumenism etc.
THE IRRATIONAL PREMISE IS THE CAUSE OF MAGISTERIAL HERESY
The present magisterium of people, at the Vatican, can only affirm Vatican Council II with an irrational premise which produces a non traditional conclusion.The result is magisterial heresy,official Catholic heresy, the heresy of the ecclesiastics.
SPENCER AND VORIS CAN AFFIRM MAGISTERIUM OF CHURCH DOCUMENTS
Spencer and Voris can differentiate between the two(magisterium of people and documents) and affirm the magisterium of Church documents, pre and post Vatican Council II, including Vatican Council II.They can affirm Church documents interpreted with a rational theology,with a rational philosophy, with sane and rational premises,to elicit a traditional interpretation, a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition in general and the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors in particular.


So they can affirm the Faith as Catholics on their own, without having to quote me, since this is a personal view of mine it is the teachings of the Catholic Church.
PHILOSOPHICAL ERRORS IN VATICAN COUNCIL II BASED ON CUSHINGISM
There are philosophical errors in Vatican Council II based on the mix up in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. The Letter assumed hypothetical cases were concrete exceptions to the dogma EENS. So Lumen Gentium 14 does not say all need faith and baptism for salvation, but, only those who know.In other words, those who are not in invincible ignorance, which refers to known, visible in the flesh cases for the Council Fathers like Cardinal Ruchard Cushing.The magisterium of people in 1949 and 1965 contradicted the magisterium of people in the previous centuries,the Church Councils and popes.
The Vatican Curia and the two popes now are aware of these philosphical errors but they will not inform Catholics about them.To interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism is an error.Even the traditionalists repeat the error out of ignorance or fear.
-Lionel Andrades
 
 
 
 
 
May 10, 2017

U.S bishops do not affirm Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) on Islam and neither do Robert Spencer and Church Militant TV

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/05/us-bishops-do-not-affirm-vatican.html

No comments: