It is unethical for the Vatican to tell a lie with a false premise.This is deception for political reasons.
All Catholic religious communities, priests, nuns, bishops and cardinals must not be forced to interpret Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) as a rupture with the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation.Presently if they do so they will be suspended, transferred or penalized in some way.
Could the ambassadors of Poland, as Catholics affirm Church teaching ( Vatican Council II, Ad Gentes 7), Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1441 on extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Catechism of the Catholic Church (845,846,1257 etc), Dominus Iesus (20) etc) interpreted with the philosophy and theology of Feeneyism i.e invisible people are not visible people on earth in 2017(philosophy) and these invisible people are not exceptions to the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation (theology).
Could they please ask the Conference of Catholic Bishops in Poland and also the Vatican Curia to do the same.
It has been many years since I have been writing on this issue and there is no response from the Vatican. So now I appeal to the Polish government.
Also an injustice is being presently done to the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) in particular and Catholic religious communities in general.They all have to interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise(invisible cases are visible on earth).Then this becomes a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite) and Tradition in general.It is only with this irrationality that the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the SSPX can have canonical recognition by the Vatican.If they accept this compromise they would become politically correct for the Masons, the Jewish Left, the two popes and the Vatican Curia.
Similarly no priest can be incardinated in Rome or Poland who does not repeat this lie i.e invisible people are visible,invisible cases of the baptism of desire are visible exceptions to all needing to be members of the Church to avoid Hell (EENS).
So the lay Catholic, your friends and relatives, have to change their understanding of the Nicene Creed, when they recite it at Mass.'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' means 'I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins( baptism of desire, blood and invincible ignorance, seeds of the Word(AG 11) etc, all without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church).'This is something serious. It is first class heresy according to the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II.
This same irrationality is taught to school children, in Catholic catechism classes in Poland, Italy and the rest of the world.
This is unethical, false and a deception by adult Catholics.
If a pope says physically invisible people ( in Heaven or on earth) are saved without the baptism of water and they are known in general , it is false. It is an objective error.For them to conclude that these invisible are exceptions to EENS is also false.
In a box of apples an orange is an exception because it exists there in that box and it is different. If it did not exist in that box it would not be an exception.How can people who do not exist in our reality be exceptions to the dogma EENS for the two popes?
We have two living popes who have made an objective error ( invisible people are objectively visible for them),when it is a fact of life that the dead who are in Heaven cannot be physically seen. So how can they( people in Heaven allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church) be exceptions to EENS? They would have to be visible and known on earth in 2017 for them to exceptions to the 'past ecclesiology' of the Church.So please tell the Vatican to announce that there are no exceptions to EENS as it was known to the magisterium of the Catholic Church in 16th century Poland and Europe all Catholics do not have to interpret Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) as a rupture with EENS to be recognised by the present magisterium of the Catholic Church..-Lionel Andrades