Tuesday, June 20, 2017

Catholic Answers keep assuming invisible people are visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

What "No Salvation Outside the Church" Means

August 13, 2011
One of the most misunderstood teachings of the Catholic Church is this one:

"Outside the Church there is no salvation" (Extra ecclesiam nulla salus).

Those trying to grasp the meaning of this teaching often struggle with its formulations by various Church Fathers and Church Councils down through history. Of course, to understand an isolated formulation of any Church teaching, one must study the historical context within which it was written: why it was written, what was going on in the Church at the time, who the intended audience was, and so on. One must discover how the magisterium (teaching office) of the Church understands its own teaching. If someone fails to do this and chooses, rather, to simply treat a particular formulation as a stand-alone teaching, he runs the risk of seriously misunderstanding it.
Lionel: For Jim Blackburn and Catholic Answers invisible baptism of desire is a visible exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This is also the reasoning of popes, cardinals and bishops.
______________________________

In recent times, the Church has recognized that its teaching about the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation has been widely misunderstood, so it has "re-formulated" this teaching in a positive way. Here is how the Catechism of the Catholic Church begins to address this topic: "How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Reformulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body" (CCC 846).
Lionel: It accomodates the error. It assumes invisible baptism of desire is a visible exceptions to the dogma EENS. This is an objective error.It is misleading by Catholic Answers. Since they have been informed about this many times over the years.Yet they keep repeating the lie.
If this is the teaching of the popes then they should admit that the popes made an objective error. Even a young boy would know that invisible people cannot be visible exceptions to the dogma EENS in 2017 or in the past.
So why do they continue with this propaganda and lie.Why do the secular authorities not do something about this ? How can Catholic Answers keep repeating this lie which is offensive to discerning Catholics.
When it is pointed out to them they do not comment. But go back to repeating the falsehood.
______________________________

In keeping with the Church’s current spirit of ecumenism, this positive reformulation comes across less harshly than previous negative formulations. Even so, it remains quite controversial. So, let’s see how this new formulation squares with Scripture.
Jesus, the Way

The first part of the reformulated teaching—"all salvation comes from Christ the Head"—is quite easy for all Christians, even non-Catholics, to understand and embrace. It echoes Jesus’ own words recorded by John: "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but by me" (Jn 14:6). So, Christians unanimously agree on this first part. But is this all that needs to be said about how one may be saved? The Catholic Church has historically recognized the importance of explaining further the means through which salvation is offered through Christ.
Lionel: Dominus Iesus says that we cannot separate the Church from the Kingdom of God and we know historically the Church was not separated from Jesus.
Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 is based on the New Theology, Cushingism, which separates Jesus from the Church on the issue of salvation.Since it was wrongly assumed that invisible cases were visible cases to the dogma EENS.
If we omit this false premise( invisible people are visible) then Vatican Council II can be re-interpreted in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
_______________________________

When speaking of salvation, Jesus offered more details than just his words quoted above. For example, consider these three verses:
  • He who believes and is baptized will be saved. (Mk 16:16)
  • [U]nless you repent you will all likewise perish. (Lk 13:3)
  • [H]e who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. (Jn 6:54)
Notice that in these three verses Jesus associated salvation with baptism, confession, and the Eucharist, respectively. Catholics recognize that these sacraments are administered through the Church. In fact, in the case of the latter two, a validly ordained priest is necessary for their administration, so the sacrament of ordination must also be associated with salvation. A primary role of the Catholic Church in conjunction with salvation is becoming quite clear.
Lionel: Yes there is no separation.
_________________________________

This brings us to the second part of the Catechism’s formulation of the doctrine being considered: ". . . through the Church which is his Body."

With Him or Against Him


Since the sacraments are the ordinary means through which Christ offers the grace necessary for salvation, and the Catholic Church that Christ established is the ordinary minister of those sacraments, it is appropriate to state that salvation comes through the Church.
Lionel: Yes but only for those who believe in the teachings of the Church and are members of the Catholic Church.There was always an exclusivist ecclesiology in the Church before the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
____________________________________

This is not unlike the situation that existed prior to the establishment of the Catholic Church. Even before it was fully revealed that he was the Messiah, Jesus himself taught that "salvation is from the Jews" (Jn 4:22). He pointed the woman of Samaria to the body of believers existing at that time, through which salvation would be offered to all mankind: the Jews.

In a similar fashion, now that the Messiah has established his Church, Jesus might say, "salvation is from the Catholics"!
Lionel: This would be the New Theology, Cushingite theology.It would be an innovation in the Church.
______________________________________

Recognizing this, we can see why the Church, especially during times of mass exodus (such as has happened in times when heresies have run rampant), has been even more forceful in the way it has taught this doctrine. Instead of simply pointing out how God offers salvation from Christ, through the Church, the Church has warned that there is no salvation apart from Christ, outside his Church.

Since Jesus established the Catholic Church as necessary for salvation, those who knowingly and willingly reject him or his Church cannot be saved. We see this in Jesus’ teaching: "He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters" (Mt 12:30). Also: "[I]f he [a sinning brother] refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector" (Mt 18:17). Paul warned similarly: "As for a man who is factious, after admonishing him once or twice, have nothing more to do with him, knowing that such a person is perverted and sinful; he is self-condemned" (Ti 3:10-11).
Lionel: This is the New Theology which accomodates invisible baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as being visible exceptions to the dogma EENS.
____________________________________

Having said all this, we must recognize that this doctrine is not as far reaching as some imagine it to be. People will sometimes ask, "Does this means non-Catholics are going to hell?" Not necessarily.
Lionel: All are on the way to Hell according to the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II (AG 7), unless they enter the Church with 'faith and bapism'.
___________________________________Invincibly Ignorant

The Church recognizes that God does not condemn those who are innocently ignorant of the truth about his offer of salvation. Regarding the doctrine in question, the Catechism of the Catholic Church (quoting Vatican II document Lumen Gentium, 16) states:
This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church: Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience—those too may achieve eternal salvation. (CCC 847)
Lionel: Those who are in invincible ignorance and are saved are not known to us on earth, in personal cases.They do not exist in our reality.So they were never an exception or relevant to the dogma EENS. It is mentioned here in LG 16 because of the objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.This is the effect of the new irrational theology. It is a new doctrine created with an irrational theology.
Hypothetical cases of invincible ignorance cannot be exceptions to EENS. This is a false reasoning. It is false philosophy.
_____________________________________
Vatican II document Gaudium Et Spesteaches similarly on the possibility of salvation:

All this holds true not only for Christians, but for all men of good will in whose hearts grace works in an unseen way. For, since Christ died for all men, and since the ultimate vocation of man is in fact one, and divine, we ought to believe that the Holy Spirit in a manner known only to God offers to every man the possibility of being associated with this paschal mystery. (22)
This teaching is consistent with Jesus’ own teaching about those who innocently reject him: "If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not have sin" (Jn 15:22).
Lionel: Again these are theoretical and speculative cases and so they cannot be relevant to the dogma EENS.
Hypothetical cases of invincible ignorance, the possibility of salvation for unknown people etc, cannot be exceptions to the dogma EENS.This was magisterial heresy. It was a doctrinal error.
___________________________________

But once a person comes to know the truth, he must embrace it or he will be culpable of rejecting it. We see this in Jesus’ words to the Pharisees: "If you were blind, you would have no guilt; but now that you say, ‘We see,’ your guilt remains" (Jn 9:41). Paul taught likewise concerning the Gentiles:
When Gentiles who have not the law do by nature what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. They show that what the law requires is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness and their conflicting thoughts accuse or perhaps excuse them on that day when, according to my gospel, God judges the secrets of men by Christ Jesus. (Rom 2:14-16)
Notice Paul’s carefully chosen words: "their conflicting thoughts accuse or perhaps excuse them." Paul did not say that those who are innocently ignorant of the truth will be saved; he simply keeps open the possibility of it.
Lionel: A possibility cannot be an exception to the dogma EENS. This was the false reasoning of the Holy Office cardinals in Rome in 1949.
__________________________________

Similarly, he wrote: "[I]s God the God of Jews only? Is he not the God of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, since God is one; and he will justify the circumcised on the ground of their faith and the uncircumcised through their faith" (Rom 3:29-30).
Necessary for Salvation

As we have seen, God introduced salvation to the world through his chosen people, the Jews. God’s revelation to the Jews found its fulfillment in Christ, the Messiah, who established the Catholic Church. The grace necessary for salvation continues to come from Christ, through his Church. Those who innocently do not know and embrace this might still attain salvation but those who knowingly and willingly choose to reject it, reject salvation on God’s terms.
Lionel:Again there is nothing said in this passage which contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
______________________________________

The Catechism (once again quoting Lumen Gentium) summarizes all this as follows:

Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it. (CCC 846)
Lionel:  'Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it'.This is a superflous passage which is based on Cushingite theology.-Lionel Andrades


 https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/what-no-salvation-outside-the-church-means

No comments: