Sedevacantists who have gone into sedevacantism because Vatican Council II was heretical and a break with the past centuries now have good news.We have found the missing link which will help them to come back into the Church.
For example the Most Holy Family Monastery, USA does not have to reject Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) since for them the Council(Cushingite) is a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.They have to observe instead that if they accept that Pope Pius XII made an objective error and he over looked the mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, they have a new way to interpret the Council(Feeneyite). With the Council(Feeneyite) traditional once again they would have no opposition to the popes since John XXIII.
Similarly Bishop Donald Sanborn does not have to reject Vatican Council II but observe that his concept of Feeneyism was based on a false premise. So Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the dogma EENS.Since the baptism of desire is invisible and not visible, as he wrongly interpreted it.
Bishop Mark A.Pivarunus ,Superior General of the CMRI must realize that his concept of the baptism of desire was wrong.There are no cases of the baptism of desire in 2017. Hypothetical cases cannot be explicit exceptions to the dogma EENS. So there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict EENS. Pope Pius XII made a mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office.
The liberal theologians were wrong to assume that Mystici Corporis, Quanta Cura etc refer to visible cases of the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance.Vatican Council II (Cushingite) is no more a reason to go into sedevacantism since we now know of a Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).
Fr.Anthony Cekada must realize that his long list of baptism of desire references are meaningless since none of them are objective cases. They cannot be relevant to EENS.Vatican Council II is in the clear.
They can continue to oppose Vatican Council II (Cushingite) but Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) is traditional.So the popes are not to be blamed.
-Lionel Andrades
When sedes and trads can accept that Pius XII made a mistake then popes since John XXIII are no more in heresy
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/06/when-sedes-and-trads-can-accept-that.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment