Sunday, June 18, 2017

No comment from Deacon Edward Schaefer diocese will place restrictions :only a Cushingite traditionalist college will be approved

This is un-charted territory for Deacon Edward Schaefer. I have sent him the following blogs posts and I have no reply.He cannot simply cite Tradition and claim that he follows Catholic doctrine.Something is amiss. Since there can be two interpretations of Vatican Council II.One is irrational and it is political correct and the other is traditional and rational but it will be opposed by the diocese and the USCCB.This would be no problem for the many 'Catholic' colleges.But Deacon Schaefer claims that the Collegium Sanctorum Angelorum will be  traditionalist with the Latin Mass.The teachings will be according to Catholic tradition.

  • When we have a Catholic college which is Feeneyite, then we will have a truly Catholic college.It

JUNE 15, 2017
  • All Board Members of the Collegium Sanctorum Angelicum will have to accept the New Theology at the Latin Mass

JUNE 17, 2017

  • Now if Chris Ferrara , Roberto dei Mattei,Bishop Robert Morlino,Fr. John Zuhlsdorf and Edward Schaefer affirm a Feeneyite Vatican Council II and EENS they will be persecuted. Would they be ready to do this? : Collegium Sanctorum Angelorum

This is not something new for him. Even last year I wrote about this issue and e-mailed him.

 SEPTEMBER 4, 2016

As a Deacon  his religious formation was also liberal.At the SSPX institutions and those of the pontifical universities in Rome the teaching is liberal and Masonic in the sense that they use an irrational premise to create a hermeneutic of rupture with past. This is now politically correct with the Left and it is being enforced strictly by the Vatican.
So this is what Deacon Edward Schaefer and his Board of Directors will offer at the Collegium Sanctorum Angelorum(CSA).
There is no denial or comment from  Schaefer to these blog posts.

Secondly if he is active in  diocese as a Deacon he will not be allowed presently to affirm Vatican Council II and the dogma EENS with Feeneyism, instead of the present diocesan Cushingism.
So he does not say anything over about two years.

Like Chris Ferrara he is not going to affirm Catholic Mission with Feeneyism.
When Ferrara, Michael Matt, Rorate Caeili and other traditionalists criticize Vatican Council II they are doing something pleasing to the liberals and Masons. Even the liberals and the magisterium state that Vatican Council II is  break with Tradition.
But if Chris Ferrara says that Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is not a rupture with Tradition and the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite), try and imagine the big reaction from the Left.

So it would be easy for Edward Schaefer, like it is for the FSSP priests, to interpret Vatican Council II and the dogma EENS with Cushingism and then they will be accepted by the diocese and the Vatican.They will get their accreditation.
But then it would be false to project CSA as a traditionalist college only because they offer the Tridentine Rite Mass. Since the ecclesiology of the Latin Mass today is not that of the Mass in the 16th century.
With the new ecclesiology, based on Cushingism, they also accept the new ecumenism and reject the dogma EENS as it was known to the 16th century magisterium.It seems  Deacon Edward Schaefer will compromise. After all if the traditionalists and sedevacantists can compromise then why not CSA, he  may ask?
He has not clarified the CSA's position on Vatican Council II. Will it be Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) which is traditional and not a rupture with the past ecclesiology? Yes he could announce that since CSA is a traditionalist college they will affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and so not reject the Council.But then before the college opens there could be restrictions placed on CSA, similar to those on the Fischer More College(FMC). Bishop Olson at Fort Worth  stopped the Latin Mass at  FMC and there was some controversy on Vatican Council II.With CSA Vatican Council II would not be an issue but EENS ( Feeneyite) would.
At the Ave Maria University in Florida for example,EENS( Feeneyite) is not an issue since it is assumed that Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) contradicts EENS ( Feeneyite). For example visible for us invincible ignorance (LG 16) is a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite).
So how can CSA reject EENS( Feeneyite) and still be traditional?
The Vatican would want the CSA, like the SSPX and the Franciscans of the Immaculate, to also accept Vatican Council II( Cushingite) and no one will mind if they call themself a traditionalist college. 
It is like John Lamont, Thomas Pink and Joseph Shaw could go ahead and teach philosophy and theology and even call themselves traditionalists if they wanted, as long as they keep interpreting magisterial documents with Cushingism. No one will object.
Or Bishop Robert Morlino and Fr.John Zuhlsdorf could offer Mass facing the East and no one at the Vatican would really object, as long as their ecclesiology is not Feeneyite on Vatican Council II and EENS.So when Fr. Zuhlsdorf comments on Islam, he does not say that all Muslims are on the way to Hell in 2017 according to Vatican Council II ( AG 7) and the dogma EENS(Feeneyite).He does not believe this.He is a Cushingite.Invisible cases of people saved with the baptism of desire and in invincible ignorance are visible exceptions to EENS( Feeneyite) for him.So he has compromised.He keeps his incardination and his blog and then asks why are churches being closed and people losing interest in the Catholic Church.-Lionel Andrades

No comments: