No priest in Rome would want to give his telephone number to defend the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Church. All the catechesis they are permitted to do assumes that there are known exceptions to the dogma EENS in 2017. They are only allowed to teach at the churches that invisible for us baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are visible exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church to avoid the fires of Hell. It is only with this irrational condition that they are permitted by the Jewish Left and ecclesiastical Masonry to teach Catholic children the Catholic faith.
No priest will give the parish phone number to explain the Catholic faith or defend a pamphlet which says all non Catholics need to enter the Catholic Church with 'faith and baptism'(AG 7) to avoid the fires of Hell: for salvation.
They cannot cite Vatican Council II or the Jewish Left rabbis and their supporters in Italy will object. Here is the passage in Vatican Council II which is in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441)- but don't tell.
7. This missionary activity derives its reason from the will of God, "who wishes all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, Himself a man, Jesus Christ, who gave Himself as a ransom for all" (1 Tim. 2:45), "neither is there salvation in any other" (Acts 4:12). Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door...
Finally, by means of this missionary activity, God is fully glorified, provided that men fully and consciously accept His work of salvation, which He has accomplished in Christ. -Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II
Every Catholic priest has to interpret the following passage in red as referring to a known case.He then has to infer that it is an exception to the passage above from Ad Gentes 7.It is only then he can teach children.
Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it." Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him...-Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II
If the passage in red is interpreted as being invisible cases in 2017 and so are not explicit exceptions to the dogma EENS and the orthodox passage above from Ad Gentes 7, the Catholic is not allowed to teach children the faith.
The passage in red has to be interpreted as 1) being objective in 2017 and 2) referring to someone saved outside the Church. So it becomes relevant to the dogma EENS.It is only then that the priest can teach children catechism.
So if there is a lay man like me who would want to teach catechism or who would want to distribute information on the faith stating that the passage in red refers to invisible cases in 2017, the priest will not provide space in church to teach catechism and nor will he give his contact number for enquiries.
Why not? Since this irrational teaching is being protected by the Vicariate in Rome and also the CDF/Ecclesia Dei and the Vatican Curia. For political reasons it is overseen by the rabbis Lara and Segni who are associated with Israel.They can use the Anti Semitism card when and however they want to.
So what is being taught to children in catechism classes is not really magisterial, it is not in harmony for example with the magisterium of the 16th century. Instead it is political.