The Philippine Catholic cardinals, bishops and priests are interpreting Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) according to the influential Talmudic Jews associated with Israel.So they have to use an irrational premise to create a break with Tradition.Catholics then have a new identity.It is a foreign-made one.
With this irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and the dogma EENS we have a new theology in the Church with new doctrines.Catholics have lost their identity.
In the Philippines too where the majority of people are Catholic, the Church has lost its identity, since the cardinals and bishops, like the Vatican Curia and the two popes, interpret magisterial documents as a rupture with Tradition. They have a choice.They could interpret Vatican Council II and the dogma EENS without the irrational premise and then they would have a Vatican Council II and the dogma EENS which is Feeneyite.It would not be a rupture with Tradition.It is doctrine and theology which determines national politics.
Then with this choice Catholics would once again have found their identity without having to reject Vatican Council II.
However the false identity is being now being supported by Cardinal Tagle and Pope Francis. So how can lay Catholics find the old Catholic identity without rejecting Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and without the help of Cardinal Tagle and Pope Francis? Can the political parties affirm correct theology and doctrine and then ask the cardinals and bishops to do the same ? Or do they just educate people with the truth, what is rational and traditional?
Then when they have found their identity according to the teachings of the Catholic Church interpreted with a rational theology (Feeneyism) Filipino Catholics an have a Constitution which is politically Catholic. The bishops can appeal to the people to only vote for political candidates who affirm the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II with Feeneyism instead of the present irrational and non traditional Cushingism.They would then be in a position to demand for the non separation of Church and State and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all pollitical legislation.This would be possible since doctrinally the identity of the Catholic would not have been changed after Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).There would be no doctrinally confusion with Cushingite Vatican Council II.
The government can then demand that Muslim clerics who uphold Islamic blasphemy laws in their Muslim countries also respect the teachings of the Catholic Church.So Muslims clerics would not be allowed to blaspheme Christians with texts from the Quran and neither would this be allowed by Talmudic Jews with texts from the Talmuds.
Also if they support the Islamic blasphemy laws in their countries they should welcome a Filipino government applying Catholic blasphemy laws upon them and the Quran.-Lionel Andrades
ISIS DESTROY CATHOLIC CHURCH IN THE PHILIPPINES