This is really historic. We have a Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican who has been teaching error and has been exposed in public and he cannot deny it.After all he cannot say that invisible people are visible.
He has to admit that invisible cases of the baptism of desire are not visible in 2017. Neither can he can go back in history and say St.Thomas Aquinas or the Council of Trent for example, when referring to visible cases of the man in the forest saved in invincible ignorance or the catechumen who desired the baptism of water but died before he received it, were personally known cases, objectively known and visible.They were not. They were always hypothetical cases for us, past or present.
So the magisterium has made a mistake, an objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.The cardinals wrongly assumed there were known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)as interpreted by Fr.Leoanrd Feeney .
They also made a mistake at Vatican Council II when they assumed that there was known salvation outside the Church.This was their new theology at the Council.
Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger were unaware of the mistake in their interpretation of Vatican Council II and so they made a mistake when they excommunicated Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.Feeneyism was the option as an interpretation which they left out.
Cardinal Muller in his interpretation of Vatican Council II has also been unaware of this error.
Vatican Council II could have been interpreted with or without the false premise and he chose the false premise.With the false premise ( Cushingism) Vatican Council II looks at Islam and the other religions in a positive way and it would suggest that they are paths to salvation.Without the false premise ( Feeneyism) Vatican Council indicates all Muslims , Jews and other Christians are on the way to eternal death. Without the false premise ( Feeneyism) Vatican Council II indicates all Muslims,. Jews and Christians are on the way to Hell since they do not have Catholic faith ( AG 7, LG 14). The Council does not contradict the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS, it does not contradict the thrice defined dogma. Cardinal Muller did not know all this or he chose not to express it.
Bishop Bernard Fellay and the SSPX finally seem to be aware of this. Since in his last Letter to Friends and Benefactors he stated 'the dogma “Outside the Church there is no salvation” has been changed surreptitiously by confused ideas'.
He must realize now that Vatican Council II can also be interpreted with Feeneyism. There is a choice. We have a choice. Explain it to Cardinal Muller and help them out with this.-Lionel Andrades
April 27, 2017
The dogma “Outside the Church there is no salvation” has been changed surreptitiously by confused ideas -Bishop Bernard Fellay
April 28, 2017
Bishop Fellay does not realize that he is confused between Feeneyism and Cushingism http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/bishop-fellay-does-not-realize-that-he.html
June 1, 2017
Cardinal Muller is not affirming Catholic teachings according to magisterial documents especially Vatican Council II