At ISOC Suzanne Pearson and Judith Sharpe are unaware of Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) : Malachi Martin and Nicholas Gruner were also using the irrational premise

'In the Spirit of Chartres Committe Inc,(ISOC) has also got it wrong on Vatican Council II. Suzanne Pearson and Judith Sharpe in an interesting discussion 1 are not aware that there is a Vatican Council II Cushingite and a Vatican Council II Feeneyite.

When Our Lady said at Fatima that 'the dogma of the faith will be lost' it is really lost on both of them.Since they both interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).

That Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the irrational premise and the conclusion is different, from the familiar one, was not known to Malachi Martin or Fr. Nicholas Gruner.

If Suzanne Pearson and Judith Sharpe choose to interpret Vatican Council II with all hypothetical cases being just hypothetical, then the Council is not a rupture with the dogma of the faith.Presently Dr.E.Michael Jones and Dr.Robert Sungenis mentioned on ISOC website are using a false premise to interpret the Council.They are doing so innocently but it does reflect the general 'diabolical disorientation' in the Catholic Church.-Lionel Andrades

1.
Fatima and the Diabolical Disorientation
July 15, 2017
isoc.ws

July 20, 2017

Fr.Nicholas Gruner and John Vennari did not know

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/frnicholas-gruner-and-john-vennari-did_20.html

July 20, 2017

Did Pope Benedict intentionally not tell Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre that Vatican Council II was not a rupture with the strict interpretation of EENS ?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/did-pope-benedict-intentionally-not_20.html

July 20, 2017
It was the Archbishop of Boston Cardinal Richard Cushing who was in heresy and not Fr.Leonard Feeney
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/it-was-archbishop-of-boston-cardinal_20.html