Bishop Athanasius Schneider will still not say that Pope Francis has made an objective mistake and violates the Principle of No Contradiction in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents even after I have e-mailed him and there are numerous reports on the Internet.He is protecting himself. Soon he will issue another report on the Internet or do an interview on the subject of Vatican Council II.He will interpret the Council with the same irrational premise. He will choose Vatican Council II Cushingite instead of Feeneyite, since this is expected him of him by the Vatican.
He calls upon Catholics to proclaim the truth but he will not do it since it could be an expensive sacrifice to make.
His statements otherwise on Vatican Council II are vague and politically accommodating. He will say there is salvation in only the Catholic Church but will not say that there are no exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).He will not affirm Feeneyite EENS since invisible baptism of desire is a visible exception for him, to the strict interpretation, as it was known in the 16th century.
He is a modernist on this sensitive issue while he otherwise criticizes modernism in the Catholic Church.
“We are living in a very special time of a deep crisis of faith inside the Church,” said Bishop Athanasius Schneider, the Auxiliary in the diocese of Maria Santissima in Kazakhstan, who opens the video, produced by LifeSiteNews and yet he will not say that Pope Francis has made an objective mistake and violates the Principle of No Contradiction in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents
Cardinal Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider accept the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which made the objective mistake. It mixed up invisible cases as being visible.This determines how they and the popes interpret Vatican Council II.If they would believe that Cardinal Richard Cushing and not Fr.Leonard Feeney was in heresy in 1949 then the interpretation of Vatican Council II changes.
If Cardinal Cushing was wrong to assume there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus then Vatican Council II is traditional and has the old ecclesiology.Since there would no be exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to the dogma EENS as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.
Presently Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider both reject Feeneyism which says, according to me, that there are no known exceptions to the dogma EENS.For them there are exceptions!
For them the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to known people saved without the baptism of water.So LG 16 etc becomes an objective and known exception to the dogma EENS, even though there are no such cases on earth.Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with Tradition because of their personal irrationality and not because of the text of the Council.
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 assumed that imaginary cases of the baptism of desire etc were not imaginary. This same error in reasoning is made by Cardinal Burke and Bishop Athansius Schneider.
Bishop Athanasius Schneider has called for a Syllabus of Errors on Vatican Council II and Cardinal Burke has called for a new catechesis when both of them do not see the factual mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, upon which so much of Vatican Council II,and their theology, is based.
Vatican Council II does not haev a hermeneutic of continuity only when hypothetical cases are considered explicit.Subjective cases are considered objective.
If they correct this error and re-read Vatican Council II ,without the premise from 1949 Letter of the Holy Office, the Council does not contradict the traditional teachings of the Church on other religions and Christian communities.
Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) does not contradict the original Syllabus of Errors or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So there is no need for a new Syllabus of Errors.
The new ecumenism is based on Cushingite theology created by the false premise. With the old ecclesiology intact; with Feeneyism, there can only be an old ecclesiology and so only an ecumenism of return.
JULY 22, 2017
Bishop Schneider will not say that Pope Francis has made an objective mistake and violates the Principle of Non Contradiction
JULY 22, 2017
Rorate Caeili and Bishop Schneider do not write that Pope Francis made a factual mistake, an objective error in his interpretation of Vatican Council II