Saturday, July 22, 2017

Bishop Schneider will not say that Pope Francis has made an objective mistake and violates the Principle of Non Contradiction

Rorate Caeili and Bishop Schneider are issuing fake news on Vatican Council II to protect their interests and remain politically correct with the present magisterium and the political Left.They are not interested in proclaiming the truths of the faith and informing Catholics about it.They support the Jewish Left here.
They continue to interpret Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingite theology and are afraid to affirm Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite). Their reasoning is irrational. For them invisible for us baptism of desire would be a visible exception to all needing to be members of the Church for salvation.With this premise they create a non traditional conclusion and attribute it to Vatican Council II. Pope Benedict and Pope Francis do the same.
They violate the Principle of Non Contradiction in their interpretation of Vatican Council II and so are unable to say that the two popes are doing the same.
It is like  Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi , professors of theology at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit, agreeing  that there are no visible for us cases of baptism of desire (BOD) and  invincible ignorance (I.I) in 2017. So there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.Since there are no visible for cases of LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, UR 3, NA 2, AG 11, AG 14, GS 22 there is nothing in the Council text to contradict Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the past ecclesiology. However they will not directly say that the two living popes have made an objective mistake. They will not say that the two popes, the present magisterium of the Catholic Church, have violated the Principle of Non Contradiction as have the traditionalists and sedevacantists.
Ralph Martin and Bishop Schneider  do not deny 1) that the baptism of desire is not physically visible in 2017 and that 2) invisible baptism of desire is not an explicit exception to the dogma EENS
Ralph Martin and Bishop Schneider do not deny that Pope Francis has made the same two philosophical errors in his interpretation of Vatican Council II. He has violated the Principle of Non Contradiction.
In other words the pope made an objective mistake in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.Ralph Martin himself has been teaching this error to his students and so has the rest of the faculty.They are  promoting this error just like Rorate Caeili and the SSPX bishops and priests.
Ralph Martin does not deny that when he wrote his books on Evangelisation and 'Will Many Be Saved'(Amazon) 
he made the above two errors.Every rational adult agrees I.I is not an exception to EENS and yet this was the reasoning at Vatican Council II.This is a major philosophical error. It runs through Vatican Council II like a theme(LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, UR 3, NA 2,AG 7, AG 11, GS 22 etc).This is not the teaching of the Holy Spirit.Bishop Schneider does not talk about this.He acts as if these facts do not exist.
This is part of the diabolical disorientation within the Catholic Church that Sr.Lucia spoke about?
According Warren Goddard 'Diabolical disorientation is due to the one turning point in the Church's life which has been entirely detrimental to the faith. Lumen Gentium Chapter 2 Section 16: Those also can attain to salvation who through no fault of their own do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, yet sincerely seek God and moved by grace strive by their deeds to do His will as it is known to them through the dictates of conscience. (19) Cfr. Epist. S.S.C.S. Officii ad Archiep. Boston.: Denz. 3869-72. 
Footnote 19 gives source authority to the 1949 Holy Office Pelagian heresy letter to Archbishop Cushing and is the theological foundation for modern ecumenism and ecumenism is the theological foundation for the Novus Ordo and justifies the overthrow of nearly all traditional Catholic teaching resulting in our Church being, for the most part, Neo-Protestant.'
Bishop Schneider does not see the objective error of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 being repeated in Vatican Council II(C) and nor does he want to interpret Vatican Council(F) without the error. He will not say that Pope Francis has made an objective mistake and violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.
-Lionel Andrades

No comments: