Vatican Council II supports a theocracy.Mission and proclamation is needed based on Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and EENS( Feeneyite).
For a Catholic theocracy - Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) is essential.
With Feeneyite Vatican Council II the Catholic Church affirms the Social Reign of Christ the King.
Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) is a foundation. Upon it is based the traditional teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and state, also the old ecumenism.When Catholics accept the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted by Fr. Leonard Feeney then Vatican Council II would pastorally be in harmony with Tradition.There can only the old ecumenism. The new ecumenism is founded on there being known salvation outside the Church. Cushingite theology. The New Theology.
The Vatican and the Left presently affirm Cushingite theology with reference to Vatican Council II.Even the traditionalists and sedevacantists are using Cushingite theology. For them there is 'known salvation' outside the Church. Invisible cases of the baptism of desire etc are 'visible exceptions' to Feeneyite EENS.So non Catholics do not always need to convert for salvation.Since they do not need to convert they reason, why should there be the proclamation of the Social Reign of Jesus over all political legislation.Why should there be the non separation of Church and State, why should there be a Catholic theocracy ?
Since the traditionalists and sedevacantists use Cushingite theology they cannot support a theocracy theologically. Their buckets of water have holes.Why do you need a Catholic theocracy when people can allegedly be saved outside the Church? Invisible for us cases are visible, according to the traditionalists and sedevacantists and then they blame the popes and Vatican Council II.
The Catholic Church officially teaches extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Ad Gentes 7, Lumen Gentium 14 Vatican Council II).
It is there in the magisterial documents though not supported by the present magisterium of ecclesiastics.
So all legislation needs to be centered on Jesus, and the Social Kingship of Jesus,there being no separation of Church and State. This is Vatican Council II Feeneyite.
It is something Fr. Nicholas Gruner and John Vennari never knew about.
Chris Ferrara did not know about it when he wrote his book The Great Facade.
Ralph Martin did not know about it when he wrote any of his many books.
Now they know about it. They have not been informed by the Jesuits or La Civilita Cattolica or the Vatican Secretary of State.
We can work for a Catholic theocracy by interpreting all magisterial documents with rational and traditional Feeneyite theology.No one can say that this is not the teachings of the Catholic Church.
We are affirming all magisterial documents except that we are interpreting them with Feeneyism theology.
The present magisterium also affirms all magisterial documents but they interpret them with Cushingism.This is the difference.
The average Catholic must know that there is no rupture between Vatican Council and the strict interpretation of the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation.Then let him proclaim. Let his mission be based on this traditional doctrine.
According to the Catholic Church, post-Vatican Council II, all non Catholics are on the way to Hell unless they enter the Catholic Church as members.
This must be understood by all Catholic political parties and Catholic religious groups.
This is important for the Polish government. They must see the link between Vatican Council II(Feeneyite), extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite) and a Catholic theocracy. Presently the Polish bishops are interpreting magisterial documents with the New Theology, Cushingite theology.Once they are on track it will be a welcome catechesis.2