Monday, July 31, 2017

For sedevacantists Eric Gajiewski and Ann Barnhardt LG 16 refers to a visible case and so Vatican Council II contradicts Tradition

LG 16 IS VISIBLE FOR ERIC AND ANN
Eric Gajieski and Ann Barnhardt interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism, they use an irrational premise.If LG 16 did not refer to a visible case for Eric and Ann then VC 2 would not contradict Tradition and Eric  would not be able to justify his sedevacantism.

Image result for ann barnhardt photosImage result for Photo eRIC gAJEWSKI
So when I ask Eric(Gajiewski),if Lumen Gentium 16 refers to a visible or invisible case for him he will not answer. It has to refer to a visible case for him otherwise how else could Vatican Council II be a rupture with EENS. Since it is a rupture with EENS,for him, Eric can now  justify his  sedevacantism based on Vatican Council II.
They both  interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism, they use an irrational premise.It is the same with Archbishop Kevin McDonald and the political Left, the one world religion people who need the new ecumenism desperately.
NEW ECUMENISM BASED ON CUSHINGISM
The new ecumenism is based on Cushingism. There is known salvation outside the Church for the English bishops since invisible cases of the baptism of desire etc are assumed to be visible.Then they infer that these invisible-visible cases!-exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.It is as if someone has had a view of this in Heaven and has come to tell us about it on earth.

ERIC AND ANN USE A FALSE PREMISE
Eric and Ann, both use a false premise.They assume hypothetical cases are not hypothetical.So they will cite the Church Fathers on extra ecclesiam nulla salus and then like the liberals will assume there are known exceptions with the baptism of desire.This was the error of Archbishop Lefebvre and Cardinal Ratzinger among others.
They both use this irrational reasoning to also interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition and in particular with extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite or as it was known in the 16th century).
Juan Javier Flores Arcas e Stefano Visintin

THIS IS NOT JUST A PERSONAL OPINION OF MINE
Fr.Stefano Visintin osb, the Rector of the University of St.Anselm, Rome says the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are not exceptions to the dogma EENS. He means physically invisible cases cannot be exceptions or relevant to Feeneyite EENS.
Similarly Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson say that BOD, BOB and I.I are not exceptions to EENS. His observation is supported by  many priests in Rome to whom I have spoken to.
So this is not just a personal opinion of mine.

VISIBLE-INVISIBLE DISTINCTION
When we make the visible-invisible distinction we do not confuse what is invisible as being invisible.
In philosophical reasoning it is normal to make the explicit-implicit, in theory-in practise, dejure-defacto reasoning.
for the sedevacantists and traditionalists BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS.

POSSIBILITY IN THE PAST NOT A KNOWN REALITY TODAY
Eric refers to St. Emerentiana.
"January 23: At Rome, St. Emerentiana, a Virgin and Martyr. She was just a catechumen when she was stoned by the Gentiles while praying on the tomb of St. Agnes, who was her foster-sister."
 She is not an example of a specific case of someone in  the present times who has been saved outside the Church. She was canonised as a saint in the past. Could she not have been baptised before or after her death as St Thomas Aquinas and St.Francis Xavier tell us? Who at that time saw her in Heaven without the baptism of water? No one.
Secondly how can a possibility of the past be a known reality in 2017 ?

WE DO NOT KNOW IF THERE WAS EVEN ONE BAPTISM OF DESIRE CASE THIS YEAR
Even if for example there were 19 cases of BOD, BOB or I.I over the last 50 years how would we know? No one can say that there was even one such case this year.Yet this is being inferred as being a known case of salvation outside the Church.
I do not know the name and surname of any BOD, BOB and I.I case who was born and who died,over the last hundred years for example.
Someone from the past cannot be an exception in 2017,to all needing to be members of the Church for salvation.In the present times there are no BOD,BOB and I.I cases.
A possibility from the past cannot be a known exception to the dogma EENS in 1949, 1965 or 2017.

ERIC AND ANN ARE IRRATIONAL WITH VISIBLE FOR US BAPTISM OF DESIRE
Eric and Ann are affirming visible for us BOD which is irrational and non traditional and they are rejecting the dogma EENS, with his visible-for-us BOD.This is heresy. 
They will also have changed the Nicene Creed to 'I believe in three known  baptisms which exclude the baptism of water, they are desire, blood and invincible ignorance.'
I,Lionel, believe in only one known baptism it is the baptism of water.BOD,BOB and I.I are unknown to me as baptisms.In general they are unknown to every body.
They may otherwise affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus but at the same time they reject it with visible for us BOD, BOB and I.I.-Lionel Andrades

 SEPTEMBER 15, 2016

Ann Barnhardt with a false premise and conclusion misinterprets the Catholic Faith http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/09/ann-barnhardt-with-false-premise-and.html


Ann Barnhardt is a Catholic even though she violates the Principle of Non Contradiction http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/ann-barnhardt-is-catholic-even-though.html

DECEMBER 18, 2015

Ann Barnhardt interprets magisterial documents with Cushingismhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/ann-barnhardt-is-using-cushingism-to.html

FEBRUARY 7, 2015

There Is No Salvation Outside The Catholic Church (Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus) - Ann Barnhardt http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/there-is-no-salvation-outside-catholic.html

JANUARY 22, 2015

The Church is still the Body and Bride of Christ, and there is no salvation outside of it. Extra ecclesiam nulla salus

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/01/the-church-is-still-body-and-bride-of.html

JULY 31, 2017

If LG 16 did not refer to a visible case for Eric Gajiewski and then VC 2 would not contradict Tradition and he would not be able to justify his sedevacantism

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/if-lg-16-did-not-refer-to-visible-case.html

JULY 31, 2017

Those who admit that they can see BOD, BOB and I.I cases in the present times will not be in mortal sin for Fr.Anthony Cekada

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/those-who-admit-that-they-can-see-bod.html

JULY 31, 2017

The two popes can be popes even though they are as heretical as the sedevacantists

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/the-two-popes-can-be-popes-even-though.html






No comments: