Pope Francis supports today's Arian-like heresy which is Vatican Council II ( Cushingism)

Pope Francis supports today's Arian heresy which is Vatican Council II ( Cushingism).LG 16 is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus for the two popes and the Bologna School. Since it is an exception for them, they infer that it is a visible case saved outside the Church. It is a known person for them saved without 'faith and baptism' in the Catholic Church.This is the New Theology based on visible cases of LG 16 etc and it is accepted by the two popes.So Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with Tradition.

If instead, Pope Francis and the Bologna School assume Lumen Gentium 16 refers to hypothetical cases and not real people known in 2017, then LG 16 does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which says all need to be members of the Church for salvation. LG 16 would refer to only a theoretical case.Then Vatican Council II is not a rupture with Tradition. LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, LG 14, AG 11, AG 14, GS 22 are all hypothetical cases.They are not physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church. So Vatican Council II is not a rupture with Tradition.

I call this interpretation, when LG 16 refers to invisible and not visible cases, as Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).

But for Pope Francis and Pope Benedict, as it was also for Pope John Paul II,  LG 16 is an exception to the dogma EENS.Fr.Leonard Feeney was wrong and the Archbishop of Boston, Cardinal Cushing was right for all of them. So for LG 16 to be an exception, Pope Francis means that LG 16 refers to a known case.Someone personally known who is saved outside Church. If it was not a visible and known case it could not be an exception.This is his inference. I call this interpretation, Vatican Council II (Cushingite).

Vatican Council II (Cushingite) is the Arian heresy in the Catholic Church today.

The passages in Vatican Council II which mention the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance (AG 7, LG 14) are superfluous. They should not have been there in the Council text.

They never were exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Stefano Visintin osb, the new Rector of the Pontifical University of St.Anselm Rome.

Now Pope Francis with Cushingite Vatican Council II violates the Principle of Non Contradiction ( how can people in Heaven be visible exceptions on earth? ). Yet this is his heretical understanding of Vatican Council II.His conclusion is false. How can invisible for us Lumen Gentium 16 etc be considered visible and excluding the baptism of water ? Is this rational reasoning? No. Is this Catholic philosophy? No. Where is the person saved in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church in 2017? There is no such person.So is the pope and Cardinal Donald Wuerl suggesting there is such a known person? Yes since they are Cushingites.

Pope Francis promotes the New Theology which is not the work of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake.How can the New Theology suggest that there is salvation outside the Church? Who in the past could have seen someone saved outside the Church? Who could have said that they have seen a St.Emerentiana or a St.Victor saved in Heaven with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water? No one. Physically it is not possibile for us humans and the Church does not recognise some one who had the ability to see such cases.So there is no known salvation outside the Church.

The pope can speculate that there is a person outside the Church who is saved.But he would not know personally.He can believe and hope there is a person who is in Heaven who is a non Catholic and is a saint.But he would not know personally. This is something only God can know.So where is the theology and doctrines to support him without Cushingism.It is only with Cushingism that he can speculate that there is salvation outside the Church.

Since he is a Cushingite and there is salvation outside the Church for him he can speculate that non Catholics are saints in Heaven.However he has rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

The pope suggests that there is a saint or someone saved outside the Church while he violates the Principle of Non Contradiction in his rejection of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite) and Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).

The two living popes also violate the Principle of Non Contradiction in the interpretation of the Nicene Creed. For them 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' is really 'I believe in three or more known baptisms, desire, blood, invincible ignorance etc for the forgiveness of sins and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.' Where are these known baptism of desire cases? Who can administer the baptism of desire? When is the baptism of desire visible practically like the baptism of water? It is not! This is all irrationality.

This is the Arian like heresy which is widespread in the Catholic Church and the error emerges from 'the top'.
I recite the Nicene Creed with a Feeneyite understanding other Catholics recite it with innovative Cushingite theology.

-Lionel Andrades