Thursday, July 13, 2017

Pope Francis violates the Principle of Non Contradiction: chooses irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II which is not the work of the Holy Spirit

Featured ImagePope Francis and Cardinal Donald Wuerl suggest that Vatican Council II is the work of the Holy Spirit without differentiating between Vatican Council Feeneyite and Vatican Council II Cushingite.There is a difference between Vatican Council II without an irrational premise or one with the premise.There is  Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic continuity or one with a rupture.One is de fide and traditional and the other is heretical and violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.Pope Francis  interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism, which is irrational and heretical. It cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.
The passages in Vatican Council II which mention the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance (AG 7, LG 14) are superfluous. They should not have been there in the Council text.They never were exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Stefano Visintin osb, the  new Rector of the Pontifical University of St.Anselm Rome.
Juan Javier Flores Arcas e Stefano Visintin
They are there since the Council Fathers did not know of the mistake made by the magisterium in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office.They used a false premise (invisible baptism of desire is visible). This is the false new theology of Vatican Council II (Cushingism).It  is the only interpretation of Vatican Council II known to the two popes.
Now Pope Francis with Cushingite Vatican Council II violates the Principle of Non Contradiction ( how can people in Heaven be visible exceptions on earth? ). Yet this is his heretical understanding of Vatican Council II.His conclusion is false. How can invisible for us Lumen Gentium 16 etc be considered visible and excluding the baptism of water ? Is this rational reasoning? No. Is this Catholic philosophy? No. Where is the person saved in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church in 2017? There is no such person.So is the pope and Cardinal Donald Wuerl suggesting there is such a known person? Yes since they are Cushingites.
Pope Francis promotes the New Theology which is not the work of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake.How can the New Theology suggest that there is salvation outside the Church? Who in the past could have seen someone saved outside the Church? Who could have said that they have seen a St.Emerentiana or a  St.Victor  saved in Heaven with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water? No one. Physically it is not possibile for us humans and the Church does not recognise some one who had the ability to see such cases.So there is no known salvation outside the Church.
The pope can speculate that there is a person outside the Church who is saved.But he would not know personally.He can believe and hope there is a person who is in Heaven who is a  non Catholic and is a saint.But he would not know personally. This is something only God can know.
The pope suggests that there is a saint or someone saved  outside the Church while he violates the Principle of Non Contradiction in his rejection of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite) and Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite)

Now the two popes also violate the Principle of Non Contradiction in the interpretation of the Nicene Creed. For them 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins'  is really 'I believe in three or more known baptisms, desire, blood, invincible ignorance etc for the forgiveness of sins and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.' Where are these known baptism of desire cases? Who can administer the baptism of desire? When is the baptism of desire visible practically like the baptism of water? It is not! This is all irrationality.
I have mentioned in a blog post yesterday 1 we have a pope who does not believe in Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite), the dogma extra ecclesiam nullas salus( Feeneyite), Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite), Catechisms ( Feeneyite) and he has issued another moto proprio in which he suggests that there is known salvation and sainthood outside the Catholic Church.He uses philosophical subjectivism to change the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church on exclusive salvation.This is pro-Masonic. He also uses philosophical subjectivism to change moral theology.This is evident in the moral theology being taught at Pontifical universities and in his un-apostolic exhortation, Amoris Laeitia.
If the pope accepted Vatican Council II Feeneyite then  young couples  engaged to be married could ask their bishops and priests to interpret the Nicene Creed without the irrational premise, before they are married.Parish Councils and Marriage Tribunals will demand that a Protestant converts into the Catholic Church before he oe she marries a Catholic.Since the non Catholic is outside the Church according to Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14),the  inter faith marriage will not be a Sacrament and a dispensation should  not be given.
Image result for Photo of Cardinal Ladaria with cardinal muller
Cardinal Ladaria, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,  would be asked to affirm Vatican Council II, Feeneyite instead of Cushingite.All religious at their Profession of Faith or Renewal of Vows would be consistent.They would be saying ' I believe in one baptism for the forgivness of sins' and mean only one known baptism and not three.Mission would be based on knowing that all non Catholics are oriented to Hell with no known exceptions, in the present times.There could only be an ecumenism of return, since there are no exceptions to the old ecclesiology of the Church based on outside the Church there is no salvation.Since there are only Catholics in Heaven and every one needs to enter the Church as a member to avoid Hell the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation would be a priority,for salvation,as would be the need for the non separation of Church and State.The Franciscans of the Immaculate, the Society of St. Pius X and the sedevacantist communities would only be asked to accept Vatican Council II Feeneyite which is traditional in its theology and doctrines.They could reject Vatican Council II Cushingite since it is heretical and not the work of the Holy Spirit.-Lionel Andrades

July 12, 2017
Pope's moto proprio suggests there is known salvation and sainthood outside the Catholic Church


 October 16, 2016
If the whole world violates the Principle of Non Contradiction then the whole world is wrong.If you and the other sedevacantists assume imaginary cases are physically visible in 2016 then you all are wrong

October 14, 2016
The Principle of Non Contradiction cannot be violated irrespective of the importance of the people or their numbers
The New Theology in itself violates the Principle of Non Contraduction

SSPX and Novus Ordo priests in Regensburg are willing to accept the New Theology which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction

Ann Barnhardt is a Catholic even though she violates the Principle of Non Contradiction

The New Theology, the official Cushingite theology contradicts the Principle of Non Contradiction

Card. Ratzinger interpreted Vatican Council II with an irrationality when a rational option was available .He then excommunicated Abp. Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops for not accepting this heretical version of the faith
Questions and Answers : Vatican Council II is Feeneyite. It has an exclusivist ecclesiology

Questions and Answers : Did the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 make a factual mistake ?

Questions and Answers : Evangelizing with Vatican Council II

JUNE 8, 2016

Muller, Di Noia and Fellay made an objective mistake : hypothetical cases are assumed to be explicit
APRIL 6, 2016

Yes! I am glad you have understood what I have been saying! Praised be Jesus and Our Lady.The issue comes down to our having no known cases of known salvation outside formal membership in the RCC

MARCH 29, 2016

"Thanks for providing this! God bless the Society!", " I agree with much of what Lionel says"

Bishop Bernard Fellay contradicted by Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson, John Martignoni : Vatican Council II does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus

No comments: