LIBERAL ON THE SALVATION ISSUE
Riccardo Cascioli editor of the apologetic magazine Il Timone in Italy is still liberal and politically correct on the salvation issue. He interprets Vatican Council II in harmony with the Jewish Left and the two popes.So he rejects exclusive salvation in the Church based on the old ecclesiology of the Church.
IL TIMONE USES A FALSE PREMISE
Riccardo Cascioli editor of the apologetic magazine Il Timone in Italy is still liberal and politically correct on the salvation issue. He interprets Vatican Council II in harmony with the Jewish Left and the two popes.So he rejects exclusive salvation in the Church based on the old ecclesiology of the Church.
IL TIMONE USES A FALSE PREMISE
His magazine advertises a dictionary on elementary apologetics published by Gianpaolo Barra the former editor of Il Timone, Milan interprets all magisterial documents using an irrational premise and so Vatican Council II, the Nicene Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are a rupture with Tradition. They are a break with the Syllabus of Errors and the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.
Their Dizionario Elementare di Apologetica needs to have a section on Cushingite and Feeneyite Theology, explaining the difference and how the the two theologies produce different conclusions in the Catholic Church.
NICENE CREED AND VATICAN COUNCIL II DEVELOPS FOR IL TIMOME
NICENE CREED AND VATICAN COUNCIL II DEVELOPS FOR IL TIMOME
In the Il Timone issue of Jan 2016 which I found in the parish there is an article by Vincenzo Sansonetti (L'apologetic a portata di tutti) in which he writes that dogmas do not evolve and neither are they modified(p.17 'I dogmi non si evolvono e non si modificano...).Yet in the Il Timone articles in general the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) has evolved for them with Cushingite theology while for me it is the same. The Nicene Creed has evolved for them while for me it is the same. They interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church with a different conclusion as compared to me.
THEOLOGY OF NEW RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS AND TRADITIONALISTS IS THE SAME
THEOLOGY OF NEW RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS AND TRADITIONALISTS IS THE SAME
The New Religious Movements in the Catholic Church which is mentioned in an article by Massimo Introvigne also use Cushingite theology, the irrational theology to modifiy dogmas and the doctrines of the Church.
Today there is no difference for me between the Focolares, Neo Catechumenale Way and the Traditionalists who attend the Tridentine Rite Mass since they are all making the same error.
The error was never corrected by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and last year as Pope Benedict XVI he consolidated it.In the Avvenire interview he said that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century. Since for him there was 'a development' with Vatican Council II( Cushingite).
Roberto Cascioli was the organiser of the Lay Conference in Rome in April this year asking for clarity on Amoris Laetitia.1 When I asked Cascioli to clarify his position on the issue of Cushingite and Feeneyite theology and how the interpretation of the Council changes depending on the premise used, there was no answer. I e-mailed him and posted messages on Twitter.No answer.The apologists do not have anything to say.
There are professors of theology and philosophy who understand what I am saying and agree with me but they are afraid to affirm it in public?
FELLAY,SCHNEIDER NOT AFFIRMING SYLLABUS OF ERRORS IN PUBLIC BASED ON VATICAN COUNCIL II FEENEYITE
Why doesn't Bishop Bernard Fellay and Bishop Athanasius Schneider not say that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Feeneyism? It means all the hypothetical cases would simply be considered hypothetical and not objective exceptions to the dogma EENS.
They both are not affirming in public the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
Why doesn't Bishop Bernard Fellay and Bishop Athanasius Schneider not say that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Feeneyism? It means all the hypothetical cases would simply be considered hypothetical and not objective exceptions to the dogma EENS.
They both are not affirming in public the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
Why does Cardinal Raymond Burke not affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legisation based on Vatican Council II( Feeneyite)? He met Matteo Salvini the secretary of the Italian political Lega Nord.
Cardinal Sarah could be an example for all of us, what stops him?
So what stops Roberto Cascioli and Il Timone from switching to Feeneyite theology and leaving behind the irrational Cushingite theology?
They have published an entire apologetics manual based on a false theology supported by the liberals and Masons.Cascioli's La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana and Il Timone is firmly anchored in the false Cushingite theology.
-Lionel Andrades
1
No comments:
Post a Comment