The pope's recent moto proprio Maiorem Hac Dilectionem is unethical and deceptive.
It is unethical to tell a lie with a false premise.This is deception for political reasons.He pleases the Left, the one world religion -people, the globalists.
The same false premise of invisible baptism of desire being a visible exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) is being taught to Catholics schools students all over the world.This is unethical, false and a deception by adult Catholics supported by the two popes.
This was the Cushingite theology of Pope Francis' Apostolic Exhortatiom Evangelii Gaudium (2013).
When Pope Francis suggests physically invisible people, on earth or Heaven, are seen and personally known and are exceptions to the dogma EENS, he is telling a lie.
This was the Cushingite theology of Pope Francis' Apostolic Exhortatiom Evangelii Gaudium (2013).
When Pope Francis suggests physically invisible people, on earth or Heaven, are seen and personally known and are exceptions to the dogma EENS, he is telling a lie.
Why do Catholics in general have to assume that invisible people are visible exceptions to the dogma EENS?
Why do Catholics have to assume that there are practical exceptions to the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century?
They are being given the lie by the two popes.It is unethical.There are not such practical exceptions.
They are being given the lie by the two popes.It is unethical.There are not such practical exceptions.
It is with this deception, this unethical reasoning, that Pope Francis says there is salvation outside the Church.So Evangelii Gaudium only called for belief in Jesus. It did not say every one needed to enter the Church for salvation.It presented the kerygma without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church.1
There is not only known salvation outside the Church for him but also known sanctification.Non Catholics are not going to Hell for him and so the will officially be made saints in the Catholic Church by a pope who has rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite), Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite) and Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) by assuming invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, are visible in 2017.He interprets the Nicene Creed, EENS and Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingite theology which is rupture with the past ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
The moto proprio Maiorem Hac Dilectionem is unethical and deceptive.It is based on Cushingite philosophy( invisible people are visible on earth and they exclude the baptism of water).There is the familiar Cushingite theology( these invisible cases are visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and so they are examples of known salvation outside the Church).
The pope contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with this invisible people are visible irrationality. He contradicts the dogma as it was known to the Apostles and the Church Fathers. It is a rupture with the magisterium of the 16th century.
-Lionel Andrades
1
JANUARY 9, 2014
Pope Francis presents Protestant kerygma contradicts Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/01/pope-francis-presents-protestant.html
APRIL 11, 2014
There can be no kerygma without the necessity of the Catholic Churchhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/04/there-can-be-no-kerygma-without.html
____________________________________
JULY 15, 2017
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment