We now have a ready-made, made- to- fit Vatican Council II.Any Catholic can affirm it before a bishop or religious superior. Those days are over when the Vatican would ask religious communities to affirm Vatican Council II for canonical status. Since Vatican Council II (premise-free) is traditional,rational and non heretical.
Call up your bishop and tell him you affirm Vatican Council II( premise-free) .Ask him what does he think about it.
If you are a lay Catholic who attends Mass at a SSPX chapel call up the Prior.Ask him what does he think about Vatican Council II ( premise-free).
Similarly if you belong to a liberal religious community, ask the superior if he or she is comfortable with it.
Tell him or her that you affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) like the missionaries and magisterium of the 16th century.If he says that's changed with Vatican Council II, tell him it hasn't with Vatican Council II (premise-free).Pre and post Vatican Council II theology is now in harmony.Vatican Council II interpreted with the premise was a rupture with Tradition, especially EENS.
So now when the Jesuits say all the natives in Goa, India would have been saved in invincible ignorance even if St.Francis Xavier did not go there,tell them it is not true.Since with Vatican Council II (premise-free) being saved in invincible ignorance is not an exception to the dogma EENS.
There was a mistake in 1960-65 at Vatican Council II.They picked up the objective error from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which inferred that invincible ignorance referred to known people saved outside the Church.Unknown people were mistaken as being known.This was the false premise.
So with the false premise Lumen Gentium 14 says those who know about Jesus and the Church and its necessity for salvation are on the way to Hell.In other words only those who know and not those in invincible ignorance, is their message.This is Vatican Council II with the false premise.It contradicts the dogma EENS which says all people need to enter the Church as members for salvation.It is not just those who know.If there is any one in ignorance, living in the forest who is to be saved, St. Thomas Aquinas says God will send a preacher to him.He does not say that invincible ignorance is an exception to the strict and traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS which he supported.
Without the false premise in Vatican Council II(LG 14 etc), we know all the natives in Goa were on the way to Hell without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. It was the same for the natives in the Americas before Columbus went there.
With Vatican Council II ( premise-free) there is nothing in Lumen Gentium 14 or Lumen Gentium itself, to contradict the traditional and strict interpretation of EENS.
With the 'old' Vatican Council II, the one interpreted with the false premise, Unitatis Redintigratio 3( Christians in imperfect communion with the Church) is referring to salvation for Protestants.The possibility is mentioned here since for the Church Fathers at Vatican Council II, at least for Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits, there was known salvation outside the Church.A theoretical possibility for them was a known reality, hypothetical speculation was an actual case of a non Catholic saved outside the Church.This is Vatican Council II interpreted by the cardinals, with the false premise.That is changed now.
When invisible cases of Christians speculatively are considered saved in imperfect communion with the Church are not physically visible and known in our reality,UR 3 does not contradict EENS.It does not contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology.There is no known Anonymous Christian saved outside the Church.There is no new ecclesiology.
Now with Vatican Council II( premise-free) there is no theological opening for the new ecumenism.
Vatican Council II with the false premise was needed to support the new ecclesiology upon which was based the new ecumenism.That is eliminated now.
We are back to the past ecclesiology which gave us theologically, only an ecumenism of return.
With Vatican Council II (premise-free) we have outside the Church there is no salvation. So tell your bishop or superior to support Catholic political parties which proclaim the non separation of Church and State and affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King in political legislation.
Since all non Catholics are on the way to Hell according to Vatican Council II(AG 7) Catholics know that the priority(to save souls from Hell) for the state-religion , is the Catholic Faith.There must be a separation of Satanic secularism and state.
If your bishop or superior does not want to accept Vatican Council II( premise-free) tell him or her that there is no other choice.Since Vatican Council II, with the false premise, is irrational,non traditional and heretical even though it is presently magisterial.It has to be rejected and replaced.
WHERE ARE THE PRACTICAL EXCEPTIONS TO EENS IN 2017?
How can you as a lay man state that people in Heaven allegedly saved outside the Church are visible on earth? Where are the practical exceptions to EENS in 2017? Do you know someone who will be saved without entering the Church, may be with the baptism of desire? Of course not.This was all nonsense. It contradicted the Principle of Non Contradiction and was made the official theology of the Church by the enemies of the Church and good people who accepted this without being aware of the confusion and deception.
WHERE ARE THE PRACTICAL EXCEPTIONS TO EENS IN 2017?
How can you as a lay man state that people in Heaven allegedly saved outside the Church are visible on earth? Where are the practical exceptions to EENS in 2017? Do you know someone who will be saved without entering the Church, may be with the baptism of desire? Of course not.This was all nonsense. It contradicted the Principle of Non Contradiction and was made the official theology of the Church by the enemies of the Church and good people who accepted this without being aware of the confusion and deception.
NOSTRA AETATE
We love and serve every one because of Jesus. This is what Jesus asks us to do and not because Nostra Aetate indicates it.There is nothing in Nostra Aetate to contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.Nor does Nostra Aetate contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvation.We know that most people are on the way to Hell at the time of death, since most people die outside the Church.In Heaven there are only Catholics (AG 7).Catholics are the new people of God the Chosen People (Nostra Aetate 4).There could be good and holy things in other religions(NA 2) but the religions are not paths to salvation.Islam is a false path to salvation and the Jewish synagogue of Satan of course leads to Hell.This is a magisterial teaching according to Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise.
So affirm Vatican Council II(premise-free) and tell your friends and relatives to do the same.If your a bishop or superior set an example for the others.
-Lionel Andrades
First Saturday
Feats of Our Lady of the Rosary.
OCTOBER 7, 2017
SSPX canonical recognition is assured : Vatican Council II (premise-free) is no more an issue
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/sspx-canonical-recognition-is-assured.html
OCTOBER 7, 2017
SSPX must re-open negotiations for canonical status : cite new doctrinal references and explanations on this blog
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/sspx-must-re-open-negotiations-for.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment