We are in the same Church but the two popes and I interpret the Nicene Creed, EENS, Vatican Council II and the Catechism differently

Pope Francis and Pope Benedict are the popes.I accept this. But I affirm the dogma EENS in harmony with Vatican Council II. Vatican Council II is a not a rupture with the dogma EENS as it was known to the magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century for me. It is not so for them. I affirm the Nicene Creed but without the irrational premise. So I am not affirming the Nicene Creed like the two popes. Similarly I accept the Catechism of the Catholic Church. But unlike the two popes and most bishops and priests I do not interpret the Catechism (1994) with an irrational premise.-Lionel Andrades
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/innocent-catholics-in-neo-catechumen.html

 OCTOBER 10, 2017

CDF Doctrinal Commentary – Professio fidei supports heresy approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/cdf-doctrinal-commentary-professio.html

OCTOBER 13, 2017

Maike Hickson could ask Abp.Guido Pozzo and the SSPX the relevant questions : right to canonical status

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/maike-hickson-could-ask-abpguido-pozzo.html

OCTOBER 12, 2017

Abp.Guido Pozzo cannot affirm the Syllabus of Errors nor the past exclusivist ecclesiology since Vatican Council II has a hermeneutic of rupture for him with invisible cases being visible : SSPX priests must correct his error

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/abpguido-pozzo-cannot-affirm-syllabus.html

 OCTOBER 10, 2017

Vatican doctrinal error could not have been made clearer : Lefebvre, Feeney censure based on the false premise

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/vatican-doctrinal-error-could-not-have.html