Wednesday, November 1, 2017

Balamand Declaration with Orthodox Christians and Declaration on Justification with Lutherans null and void : wrongly interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors

The Joint Declaration on Justification with the Lutherans and the Balamand Declaration1 with the Orthodox Christians are null and void since Pope Benedict rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).If it was not a ruse but a simple error, then the error was made by assuming there were known cases of non Catholic saved outside the Church with the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and in invincible ignorance (in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case) and that there are known cases of LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 in the present times saved outside the Church.There would have to be known cases for there to be an exception to EENS.Invisible people cannot be exceptions to all needing to be incorporated into the Church as members for salvation. So by mixing up what is invisible as being visible,what cannot be known as being known,  the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church based on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Council of Florence 1441) was rejected blatantly by Pope Benedict.It was his contribution to the emerging One World Religion being supported by the Jewish Left.

30. To pave the way for future relations between the two Churches, passing beyond the outdated ecclesiology of return to the Catholic Church connected with the problem which is the object of this document, special attention will be given to the preparation of future priests and of all those who, in any way, are involved in an apostolic activity carried on in a place where the other Church traditionally has its roots. -Balamand Declaration

So for Pope Francis and Pope Benedict the Orthodox Christians, Lutherans and Methodists do not need convert into the Catholic Church as members for salvation.Since there is known salvation outside the Church. There are practical exceptions to the dogma EENS for them, even though they cannot name any particular person seen in Heaven without the baptism of water.They have rejected the extraordinary and ordinary magisterium of the Church on extra ecclesiam nulla salus which Pope Pius XII called an 'infallible teaching'( Letter of the Holy Office 1949-First part).
Image result for Balamand Declaration with Pope Benedict PhotosImage result for Balamand Declaration with Pope Benedict Photos
The two living popes have also rejected the old ecclesiology of the Church by re-interpreting Vatican Council II with hypothotical cases being non- hypothetical.They are  alleged living examples, known cases, of Orthodox Christians, Protestants, Lutherans and Methodists being saved outside the Church.This is objectively false. It also contradicts the Principle of Non Contradiction.
It is different with me.
Image result for Photo One world Religion catholic church
I affirm Vatican Council II and 'the strict interpretation' of the dogma EENS since I do not use an irrational premise to interpret these magisterial documents.Invisible people are invisible for me.The baptism of desire for example refers to an invisible case in 2017.
Image result for Photo One world Religion catholic church
So for me the Balamand Declaration is as null and void theologically and doctrinally for me as is the Declaration on Justification with the Lutherans,who are outside the Church and are on the way to Hell where Martin Luther presently is, according to Padre Pio.
Image result for Photo Padre Pio
I affirm the Syllabus of Errors since Vatican Council II ( with LG 16 referring to hypothetical cases only) is not a rupture.
I affirm an ecumenism of return since this is the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church supported by the dogma EENS which is not contradicted by Vatican Council II ( premise-free).
Image result for Photo One world Religion catholic church
To reject the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II is a mortal sin of faith.So the two popes and the cardinals are in manifest mortal sin. They sin even after being informed.
Similarly to change the Nicene Creed into ' I believe in three or more known baptisms, examples of salvation outside the Church and they are the baptisms of desire, blood and invincible ignorance, all of which exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church' is a first class heresy.
Image result for Photo One world Religion catholic church
The two popes and all the cardinals presently interpret the Nicene Creed, the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II with a false premise and so reject the 'outdated ecclesiology of return to the Catholic Church' as the Balamand Decalaration officially states.It is reported on the Vatican website.
According to Canon Law a Catholic must affirm the Nicene Creed, the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents ( Syllabus of Errors etc) in harmony with the past magisterium of the Church and Sacred Tradition. No innovations can be made by using an irrational premise, to change the centuries old interpretation.
-Lionel Andrades


Balamand declaration

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Uniatism, method of union of the past, and the present search for full communion, also known as the Balamand declaration and the Balamand document, is a 1993 report written by the Joint International Commission for Theological Dialogue Between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church during its 7th plenary session at Balamand School of Theology in Lebanon.[1][a] The report discusses ecclesiological principles and suggests practical rules for both the Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Churches to implement about improving relations by reciprocally avoiding interfering in each other's Churches and not using history in a polemical manner.[1][2] According to Cardinal Edward Cassidy, the report contains three principles: that individuals have the freedom to follow their conscience, that Eastern Catholic Churches have the right to exist, that uniatism is not the current method of full communion.


OCTOBER 31, 2017

Vatican-Lutheran Joint Declaration on Justification was null since the Catholic side rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and wrongly re-interpreted Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS

No comments: