Friday, November 3, 2017

Bishop Fellay is the biggest impediment for the SSPX receiving canonical status

Image result for Photo Nicole WinfieldNone of the signatories of the new letter is a cardinal, and the highest-ranking churchman listed is actually someone whose organization has no legal standing in the Catholic Church: Bishop Bernard Fellay, superior of the breakaway Society of St. Pius X. Several other signatories are well-known admirers of the old Latin Mass which Fellay's followers celebrate..-Nicole Winfield, Associated Press
In Sept.2017 Nicole Winfield of AP said the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX ) had no standing in the Catholic Church.The writer will not state that if Catholic religious communities including the SSPX would choose to interpret Vatican Council II based on a rational interpretation of the Fr. Leonard Feeney case, then the interpretation of Vatican Council II changes and the SSPX can ask for canonical status.
Nicole Winfield can continue with the leftist propanda since ,' the Bishop Fellay group interprets extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) like the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and considers the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) visible and known examples of salvation outside the Church and so exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.'1
''  Bishop Fellay does not know that with the Fr.Leonard Feeney case there can be two interpretations of Vatican Council II. The Boston Heresy Case is linked to the interpretation of Vatican Council II. If for you Fr.Leonard Feeney was in heresy Vatican Council II emerges as a rupture with Feeneyite EENS and the Syllabus of Errors. If for you the Archbishop of Boston and the Holy Office 1949 were heresy, then Vatican Council II emerges in harmony with EENS according to the missionaries in the 16th century. There is no rupture with the Syllabus of Errors.
So choose
Bishop Fellay like the present popes and magisterium have chosen to accept that Fr. Leonard Feeney was wrong and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 was correct. So with the irrational premise of the 1949 Letter (visible cases of BOD,BOB and I.I) they interpret Vatican Council II (visible cases of LG 16,UR 3,NA 2 etc) as a rupture with Tradition.It becomes a rupture with Feeneyite EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.So there is no more the past ecclesiology with an ecumenism of return. Since now there are exceptions to the old ecclesiology.'
The same declaration (LG, 8) also recognizes the presence of “salvific elements” in non-Catholic Christian communities. The decree on ecumenism goes even further, adding that “the Spirit of Christ does not refrain from using these churches and communities as means of salvation, which derive their efficacy from the fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Catholic Church.” (UR, 3)
Such statements are irreconcilable with the dogma “No salvation outside of the Church, which was reaffirmed by a Letter of the Holy Office on August 8, 1949". - Bishop Bernard Fellay (April 13, 2014 ) Letter to Friends and Benefactors no. 82 2
We can clearly see that Bishop Fellay like Archbishop Lefebvre is affirming the Letter of the Holy Office. So for both of them Vatican Council II was a rupture with Tradition. Even for Pope Benedict, cardinals Muller and Ladaria and Archbishops Pozzo and Di Noia, Vatican Council II is a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors and so the 150 anniversary of the Syllabus of Errors was not celebrated.
'May be if there is new Superior General of the SSPX,who does not make the doctrinal mistake of Bishop Fellay, there can be a reconciliation with the Vatican.The SSPX could demand canonical status.Since Vatican Council II would no more be a rupture with Tradition.'
Presently Nicole Winfield can write what she writes about the traditionalists since they interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise and do not know about the rational choice.She knows that Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the premise but she is not going to write about it.Why would she inform the SSPX about it? It is the same with Crux and the National Catholic Reporter.The conclusion of Vatican Council II( premise-free) is traditional. It supports what Pope Benedict refers to as the past ecclesiology of an ecumenism of return.-Lionel Andrades

November 2, 2017
Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) is divided on theology and doctrine.There are two groups


No comments: