Thursday, November 2, 2017

Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) is divided on theology and doctrine.There are two groups

Image result for Photos divided
The Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) is divided on theology and doctrine.There are two groups within the SSPX.
The Bishop Fellay group interprets extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) like the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and considers the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) visible and known examples of salvation outside the Church and so exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.

Capitularies of the SSPX's 2012 General Chapter
The other group expressed itself in the 2012 General Chapter Statement.It affirmed Feeneyite EENS.
For them BOD,BOB and I.I were not exceptions.They were not even possibilities relative to EENS.This was a big victory for the SSPX leaders (above photo) who affirmed EENS according to the missionaries of the 16th century and not according to Pope Benedict XVI,Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop Bernard Fellay.

The dogma “Outside the Church there is no salvation” has been changed surreptitiously by confused ideas, to the point of altering the statement that the Church of Christ and the Catholic Church are identical.-Bishop Fellay1

Bishop Fellay does not know that with the Fr.Leonard Feeney case there can be two interpretations of Vatican Council II. The  Boston Heresy Case is linked to the interpretation of Vatican Council II. If for you Fr.Leonard Feeney was in heresy Vatican Council II emerges as a rupture with Feeneyite EENS and the Syllabus of Errors. If for you the Archbishop of Boston and the Holy Office 1949 were heresy, then Vatican Council II emerges in harmony with EENS according to the missionaries in the 16th century. There is no rupture with the Syllabus of Errors.3
So choose.
Image result for Photos divided
Bishop Fellay like the present popes and magisterium have chosen to accept that Fr. Leonard Feeney was wrong and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 was correct. So with the irrational premise of the 1949 Letter (visible cases of BOD,BOB and I.I) they interpret Vatican Council II (visible cases of LG 16,UR 3,NA 2 etc) as a rupture with Tradition.It becomes a rupture with Feeneyite EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.So there is no more the past ecclesiology with an ecumenism of return. Since now there are exceptions to the old ecclesiology.

The same declaration (LG, 8) also recognizes the presence of “salvific elements” in non-Catholic Christian communities. The decree on ecumenism goes even further, adding that “the Spirit of Christ does not refrain from using these churches and communities as means of salvation, which derive their efficacy from the fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Catholic Church.” (UR, 3)
Such statements are irreconcilable with the dogma “No salvation outside of the Church, which was reaffirmed by a Letter of the Holy Office on August 8, 1949". - Bishop Bernard Fellay  (April 13, 2014 ) Letter to Friends and Benefactors no. 82 2
We can clearly see that Bishop Fellay like Archbishop Lefebvre is affirming the Letter of the Holy Office. So for both of them Vatican Council II was a rupture with Tradition. Even for Pope Benedict, cardinals Muller and Ladaria and Archbishops Pozzo and Di Noia, Vatican Council II is a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors and so the 150 anniversary of the Syllabus of Errors was not celebrated.
May be if there is new Superior General of the SSPX,who does not make the doctrinal mistake of Bishop Fellay, there can be a reconciliation with the Vatican.The SSPX could demand canonical status.Since Vatican Council II would no more be a rupture with Tradition.
Presently SSPX priests like the diocesan and religious priests in Rome are afraid to discuss doctrine or give a statement in public since they could be penalized.Even SSPX priests are afraid of Bishop Fellay  and their position on Vatican Council II is like a political position. 
Meanwhile Bishop Fellay and his Curia continue to interpret Vatican Council II and the dogma EENS with the false premise. For them there is a new theology with invisible for us BOD,BOB and I.I being visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
For me there are no exceptions in Vatican Council II to the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS. There is no rupture with the old exclusivist ecclesiology, the past ecclesiology with an ecumenism of return has not been changed.This is a traditional and rational interpretation and not that of the liberals and traditionalists.
SSPX priests cannot discuss on line what I have written here. They cannot agree or disagree.Even the SSPX Superior and others at Albano, Italy, near Rome, are not commenting  for or against.
Since for the SSPX bishops the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 has to be accepted.So Vatican Council II has to be interpreted like the two liberal popes.It must be considered for as a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors  and past ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.-Lionel Andrades



The 150th anniversary of the Syllabus of Errors is not being celebrated in the Catholic Church since the CDF assumes there are known exceptions to Pope Pius IX in Vatican Council II


Bishop Bernard Fellay interprets Vatican Council II with the irrational premise and conclusion : there is an option, a rational conclusion of which he is unaware of.

September 25, 2016

Bishop Fellay's understanding and interpretation of Vatican Council II is heretical.

September 11, 2016

Cardinal Muller, Archbishop Di Noia and Bishop Fellay's theology is based on invisible cases being visible, what is not seen as being seen

June 14, 2016

SSPX doctrinal position is politically correct and heretical : Bishop Fellay interprets EENS and Vatican Council II assuming hypothetical cases are objectively known in the present times.


NOVEMBER 1, 2017

Two popes and many cardinals and bishops are automatically excommunicated : refuse to affirm magisterial documents without the use of an irrational premise

NOVEMBER 1, 2017

While I affirm all magisterial documents like the two popes and cardinals, our interpretation is different : they may not like my conclusion but they cannot show me an error in theology or philosophy.

NOVEMBER 1, 2017

Balamand Declaration with Orthodox Christians and Declaration on Justification with Lutherans null and void : wrongly interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors

No comments: