Reposts : Archbishop Corrado Lorefice supports anathema and heresy contradicts Jesus' teaching and the Council of Trent
APRIL 12, 2017
Archbishop Corrado Lorefice supports anathema and heresy contradicts Jesus' teaching and the Council of Trent
The Bible, Council of Trent and pre 1949 Catholic Tradition says the baptism of water is necessary for salvation.The dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus defined by three Church Councils confirms this.
The Council of Trent says 'let him be anathema' who does not believe in this .
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 issued by Cardinal Francesco Selvaggiani and approved by the Holy Office in Rome and the Archbishop of Boston, says the baptism of water is not always necessary. For this Letter there are exceptions to Jesus' teaching in John 3:5 even though no one knows of any practical exception.This Letter has been placed in the Denzinger by Fr. Karl Rahner s.j and was approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member-Letter of the Holy Office 1949
' it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member'. This is heresy.1
Archbishop Corrado Lorefice, the Archbishop of Palermo in his suspension of Fr.Alessandro M.Minutella has cited 'the role and the teaching authority of the Roman Pontiff and the bishops in communion with him.' He has also cited canon law for the suspension of Don Alessandro M.Minutella yet in so many doctrinal ways he and other bishops violate canon law.They affirm heresy, magisterial heresy.
1.Thearchbishop accepts the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 issued by Cardinal Francesco Selvaggiani.It was approved by the Holy Office in Rome and the Archbishop of Boston.It says the baptism of water is not always necessary for salvation.So for Archbishop Lorefice there are exceptions to Jesus' teaching in John 3:5.
Lay people must ask him where are the practical exceptions to Jesus' teaching? How can any one in Palermo know of someone saved in 2017 without the baptism of water in the Church?
To assume invisible cases are visible I call Cushingism.To assume invisible baptism of desire is really visible baptism of desire is Cushingism.The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 was Cushingite.
This same Cushingite reasoning is used by Archbishop Lorefice to interpret Vatican Council II.
2.Archbishop Corrado Lorefice interprets the Second Vatican Council and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with irrational Cushingism theology.He does not interpret the Second Vatican Council and extra ecclesiam nulla salus with rational and traditional Feeneyite theology. There is a break for example, with the teachings of 16 th century.The present magisterium, of the two popes and cardinals and bishops in union with them, is a rupture with the magisterium of the 16th century. Pope Benedict XVI confirmed this in March 2016 when he said the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is no more like it was for the 16th century missionaries.
The Magisterium is inspired by the Holy Spirit and can not teach error, so how can the Second Vatican Council (Cushingite) be magisterial for the present magisterium?
3.There is no change in the ecclesiology of the Church since there is no new revelation and the Holy Spirit is the same.The past ecclesiology is valid today and supports the teaching on the Social Kingship of Christ the King over all political legislation.Now there is a separation of Church and Stato for the Archbishop of Palermo. He rejects the old ecclesiology.Since his reasoning is Cushingite. He accepts the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. 4.Since Archbishop Corrado Lorefice does not interpret the Second Vatican Council and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Feeneyism, there is no continuity for him with the old ecumenism of return.Instead his new ecumenism is a break with Tradition and is heretical.Since there is known salvation outside the church for him with Cushingism,Protestants do not need to convert into the Church.
This is 'the false church' which suspended Fr.Alessandro M.Minutella refers to.This is the false church supported by Pope Francis, Enzo Bianchi etc. These are just some examples of heresy with a new theology (Cushingism) that create new doctrines in the Catholic Church. There is much more.
So the Archbishop must be informed that he is heretical in his acceptance of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
He is heretical in his interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism.
He is heretical in his rejection of the dogmaextra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite).
He is heretical in his interpretation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.
He is heretical in his interpretation of the Nicene Creed with irrational Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.According to Canon Law, a legal person (Archbishop) can not hold office if he does not believe in the teachings of the Catholic Church.We have Archbishop Lorefice and other bishops in a false church within the Catholic Church who affirm heresy in public and they are supported by the two popes so Canon Law is not applied. A.They rifutetraditional Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus (Feeneyite), which does not mention any exceptions. B.They reject Vatican II (Feeneyite) which does not mention any exception to Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus (Feeneyite) .
LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, GS 22, NA 2, LG 14 etc. refer to invisible cases (with Feeneyism) and so they are not explicit exceptions to the teaching on all needing to be incorporated into the Catholic Church for salvation.There are also no practical exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus, for example,in 2017. C.They reject the old ecumenism and inter-religious dialogue, which was part of mission and was based on the past ecclesiology of the Church that was Feeneyite. D.They reject, with their Cushingite theology, the Social Kingship of Christ the King over all poltical legislation and there being no separation of Church and State.
According to the past magisterium, 16th century for example, Archbishop Corrado Lorefice would have no right to their office in the Catholic Church because of heresy and irrationally interpreting magisterial documents.he contradicts the Bible, Council of Trent and pre 1949 Catholic Tradition.