Sunday, January 14, 2018

Repost : Why is Vatican Council II not fundamentalist for La Stampa? Archbishop Guido Pozzo does not state that Vatican Council II is fundamentalist.Even Catholic conservatives, traditionalists and La Stampa journalists are not aware that Vatican Council II in itself is fundamentalist

OCTOBER 20, 2016


Why is Vatican Council II not fundamentalist for La Stampa?Archbishop Guido Pozzo does not state that Vatican Council II is fundamentalist.Even Catholic conservatives, traditionalists and La Stampa journalists are not aware that Vatican Council II in itself is fundamentalist

Comment from The Eponymous Flower
Hit List Against "Anti-Bergoglians"? -- Misericordina for Pope Critics
The La Stampa report suggesting conservatives and even the SSPX are  fundamentalist was not contested by Ecclesia Dei.
Archbishop Guido Pozzo does not state that Vatican Council II is fundamentalist.
Even Catholic conservatives, traditionalists and La Stampa journalists are not aware that Vatican Council II in itself is fundamentalist.
Why is Vatican Council II not fundamentalist for La Stampa?
It is because their leftist journalists infer that hypothetical cases are explicit in 2016.Then with this irrational premise they interpret Vatican Council II.They get a non traditional and heretical conclusion.In this way Vatican Council II is not 'fundamentalist'.It is a rupture with Tradition.
Like me they could assume hypothetical cases are just hypothetical.So then hypothetical LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc would not contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

There would be nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict Feeneyite EENS.
The Council would be saying there has to be an ecumenism of return and all non Christians need to formally convert into the Catholic Church with 'faith and baptism'(AG 7). This would be terribly fundamentalistic.
Instead Archbishop Pozzo like the leftist journalists at Vatican Insider,interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise and conclusion. So the SSPX is fundamentalist for accepting this interpretation of Vatican Council II with the premise and then rejecting the Council.They reject the Council when it is a rupture with Tradition.

While La Stampa, CDF are not fundamentalist since they also use the same false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and they accept the conclusion.
La Stampa, CDF and SSPX interpret Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases being physically visible. Then they infer that these visible cases are exceptions to the dogma EENS in 2016.So the Council (with the premise) is a break with traditional and 'fundamentalistic documents'(EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc)
Tancred what's your position on Vatican Council II, is it fundamentalist or not for you?
-Lionel Andrades

No comments: