Tantumblogo and commentators on the Dallas blog do not know that the baptism of desire has nothing to do with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)

The baptism of desire(BOD) has nothing to do with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) yet this is beyond Tantumblogo and commentators on  the Dallas blog (Columbe on Fr.Feeney). 1

Tantumblogo is a Cushingite who attends the Traditional Latin Mass(TLM) and interprets the baptism of desire(BOD) as being an exception to EENS(Feeneyite).

While some of the commentators on(Columbe on Fr.Feeney)

are supporters of Feeneyism according to the St.Benedict Centers.They reject  BOD as an exception to EENS,and they too attend the TLM.

So we have two groups of traditionalists who use a different theology and attend the TLM.

Their doctrines will also change with Vatican Council II.

So there is no unity of doctrine and theology at the TLM.I too could attend the TLM and unlike them affirm,Vatican Council II(Feeneyite), support the St. Benedict Centers on EENS(Feeneyite) and reject Tantumblogo on EENS and Vatican,which is Cushingite for him.It is the same Mass and we are all Catholics.

So when Fr.John Zuhlsdorf and Pope Benedict refer to liturgy as being everything, it is because they have to accept the false theology and reject EENS (Feeneyite) and Vatican Council(Feeneyite).This is how Bishop Morlino also offers the TLM in the Diocese of Madison, USA.

So every once in a while they churn out the usual stuff-save the liturgy and save the world( even with false theologies and doctrines).

They do not approve EENS and they approve the wedding Mass between a Protestant and Catholic.It is a Sacrament for them and not adultery.

The problem originates with them not knowing that the  baptism of desire(BOD) has nothing to do with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It definitely was not,and nor,is an exception to EENS.-Lionel Andrades

1.
https://veneremurcernui.wordpress.com/2018/01/11/coulombe-on-fr-feeney/