Christopher Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei after so many years are still not responding to these blog posts which refer to them specifically by name, and which are also posted on other media besides this blog.
They must concede that they had made a mistake on Vatican Council II over the last 50-plus years and did not know that Vatican Council II can be interpreted in harmony with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church and the Syllabus of Errors.
Presently they do not defend themselves theologically and rationally and neither do they correct me.
They were interpreting Vatican Council II like the liberals and the Left.
Un-aware that that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops had made a mistake, they followed them. There was a rational choice but it was not known to them. . The false intepretation of Vatican Council II is 'the official policy' of the SSPX. It is being followed by the website Rorate Caeli , Angelus Press, Remnant News, Lifesites.com News and numerous bloggers.-Lionel Andrades
Vatican Council II is not how Christopher Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei interpret it (Graphics) http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/vatican-council-ii-is-not-how_24.html
APRIL 24, 2018
APRIL 25, 2018
If you interpret Lumen Gentium 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth in other religions) as referring to known or unknown people in the present times you have two interpretations of Vatican Council II : If you interpret the baptism of desire as referring to invisible or visible people saved outside the Church in the present times you have two interpretations of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/if-you-interpret-lumen-gentium-8.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment